Originally posted by Shane
Well Donner, I trust the following gives cause to change your flag to either a neutral Yellow, or gangbuster Green.
Shane
Actually, I think it explains the point I was trying to make rather well.
The three links you provided were all referencing the same story, a single egyptian geologist. What i got from the articles is that the egyptian
basically stated that what was unearthed appeared to him to be man made and warranted further investigation. Fine, it is possible that they DID
unearth something manmade... but is it a pyramid? Or is it the remains of a medieval fort, maybe a Roman road?
Or, as stated in one of the links you provided:
Link
A petition signed by 22 Bosnian experts pointed out that Osmanagic is an amateur and claimed that the stone blocks he unearthed are part of a medieval
graveyard.
These articles also seem to gloss over the fact that a team of Bosnian geologists already had done a survey of the area and found it to be a natural
formation, as Doug Weller provided in the link in his post above.
I'd be interested to see under what circumstances the egyptian was brought in... was it to look at what they had found so far and form an unbiased
opinion? Or was it to look at what had been unearthed so far of the 'bosnian pyramid'? What exactly does an egyption geologist add that a team of
Bosnian geologists lack other than being unfamiliar with the area and its history?
Regarding the 'Special material linking the stone blocks': well... mortar, a mixture of plaster and sand, is used just about any time stones are
used in buildings, it is not unique to pyramids.
No, i'm sorry but the red flags remain. Worked stone can be there for a variety of reasons: fortifications, roads, or as the Bosnian experts claim -
a medieval graveyard. I am just of the opinion that conclusions should be drawn AFTER a full investigation has been done and evidence is available for
analysis, not before.
