It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NeoQuest
The US Government is making a very big mistake to attack Iran militarily IMHO. Better to leave them. The Ayatollahs lack popularity and Nejad presidency would lose legitimacy. Instead we give these guys something to run on. As for nukes, I don't believe Iran has any, and is making any because I don't believe they can. If they do have some, someonr gave it to them, which is something that could happen anyway. If they do want to make them they won't have them anytime soon.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Iran stands absolutely no chance of having its conventional military survive a US invasion. Iraq was one of hte great regional miliatry powers in teh middle east, and it's conventional military was defeated utterly and completely and permanently.
Iran could have a more powerful and better organized resistance to the occupation, but it can't prevent the occupation.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Marge, if the US invades, which I don't think we will, but if we do then Iran’s conventional military will fare no better then Iraq’s did in 91 or 03.
Now, the area in which they can cause problems is in the occupation phase.
This is one of the many reason I would not support an invasion of Iran over the Nuclear issue.
Iran, on the other hand, has had a relatively free hand in building and developing her forces for some time. Free from the restrictions of sanctions and with a sizeable income from Oil, she is in a far better state than Iraq EVER was.
I disagree it has been over 20 years since that time and Iran may very well have some more modern weapons that Saddam had back in 91 and 93.
Still no enough against US conventional weapons but nerveless weapons to cause harm.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
This sounds pretty ominous. I pray we do not take any nuclear action.
Ever heard of the saying, speak softly but carry a big stick? What’s coming out of Iran is just rhetoric, that all. Kind of like Saddam promising the “mother of all battles”.
My point is this. While the US undoubtably has a superior air arm, the difference on the ground is not so vast as to be a walkover for the Yanks and any other dopy monkeys silly enough to follow them. You have a hard enough time against the insurgency, for crying out loud.
Do you honestly expect the Iranians to sit and be bombed like good little enmies, like the Serbians did in 1999. Even then, the damage done by airstrikes to the Serbian military was minimal, hence the switch to strategic targets half way through the campaign.
The Iranians will retaliate, escalating the situation further. You could see a possible incursion into Iraq, seeing as we have men there. The whole thing will not be limited to "surgical strikes" by any means.
never said US is not better now than 10 years ago or 15 but even with all it’s might still can not control a country through occupation.
Hopefully for our nations sake it will be an air assault and nothing else.
Originally posted by stumason
My point is this. While the US undoubtably has a superior air arm, the difference on the ground is not so vast as to be a walkover for the Yanks and any other dopy monkeys silly enough to follow them. You have a hard enough time against the insurgency, for crying out loud.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Valid warnings, stumason.
Accordingly though, I recall that pretty much what you are saying was said prior to the First Gulf War...and the Second.
seekerof
Originally posted by Desert Dawg
MOAB information:
usmilitary.about.com...
With the ordinance we have at our disposal, I don't think nuclear will be required.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Yes stumason I agree, war by no means is easily predictable and the potential always exists for surprises which can be devastating. However I’m merely stating how I think the situation is likely to unfold. Also, fair point you make about the Oil Shipping, its a very vulnerable target due to the layout of the region.
[edit on 16-4-2006 by WestPoint23]