DEA Agent Sues Over Internet Video, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 28-1-2013 @ 09:22 PM by RalagaNarHallas
old thread i know but i figured people might wanna know how the case ended up www.thesmokinggun.com...

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit brought by the DEA agent who shot himself in the leg during a gun safety demonstration and later became a punch line when video of the incident surfaced online and was widely broadcast on TV. Agent Lee Paige, 50, contended that the leak of the video--for which he blamed DEA officials--amounted to a violation of his privacy rights. However, in a December 29 order, Judge Jack Shanstrom rejected that claim and dismissed Paige’s U.S. District Court complaint in its entirety. Paige, who worked undercover, claimed that the video’s distribution resulted in him becoming the “target of jokes, derision, ridicule, and disparaging comments” everywhere he went.



reply posted on 28-1-2013 @ 09:57 PM by whatsecret
Originally posted by RalagaNarHallas
old thread i know but i figured people might wanna know how the case ended up
www.thesmokinggun.com...

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit brought by the DEA agent who shot himself in the leg during a gun safety demonstration and later became a punch line when video of the incident surfaced online and was widely broadcast on TV. Agent Lee Paige, 50, contended that the leak of the video--for which he blamed DEA officials--amounted to a violation of his privacy rights. However, in a December 29 order, Judge Jack Shanstrom rejected that claim and dismissed Paige’s U.S. District Court complaint in its entirety. Paige, who worked undercover, claimed that the video’s distribution resulted in him becoming the “target of jokes, derision, ridicule, and disparaging comments” everywhere he went.


“I am the only one in the room professional enough, that I know of, to carry this Glock 40.” It was at that point, of course, that Paige shot himself in the leg.



I just cannot stop laughing.

What a doofus.
edit on 28-1-2013 by whatsecret because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 28-1-2013 @ 10:00 PM by RalagaNarHallas
reply to post by whatsecret



yeah kinda dumb if your an undercover cop to appear in any video as a cop...would be like a person in the witnesprotection program going on tv and showing their new id off


reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 06:10 AM by Zaphod58
reply to post by MrWendal



Then that's even worse. He should have known that it didn't have a safety, and taken precautions to prevent an accidental discharge.


reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 08:39 AM by MrWendal
reply to post by Zaphod58



You won't get any argument from me on that one, however accidents do happen and that's all this incident was. An accident. Was it preventable? Absolutely. Most accidents are preventable.


reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 09:17 AM by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by RalagaNarHallas



Good. I'm glad the suit was dismissed.

How little dignity must you have to file suit against a person for simply showing a real event as it took place?

The camera didnt make him out to be a fool. He made himself out to be a fool and the camera just caught it.

Filing suit makes him a little bitch of a fool.


reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 09:18 AM by geocom
reply to post by Icarus Rising



Uh it's a glock the safety is in the trigger as in the trigger is forked with another small lever in the middle so you have to be pressing the trigger for it to go off
edit on 1/29/2013 by geocom because: Typo




reply posted on 29-1-2013 @ 09:22 AM by sulaw
reply to post by Icarus Rising



This is how accident's happen... Even someone who is supposedly highly trained makes mistakes.... I think that's the point, he made a mistake... Lucky the bullet didn't ricochette~ I'll take his foot over missguided bullet any day, as he was the demonstrator and he was the one responsible.

So he get's right's to sue over this? Who would even represent this joke? This saddens me~ And I laugh all the same


reply posted on 30-1-2013 @ 10:25 AM by MrWendal
Originally posted by Vasa Croe
Actually to be perfectly correct it does have a safety in the form of a small "trigger within a trigger". Not that I, or anyone that knows weapons, would ever really consider that a safety.

us.glock.com...

But alas....the DEA agent is still a complete dumba$$.


eh you got me there. Yes it does have that smaller trigger on the trigger, but as you said very well- I don't consider it to be a safety by any means.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Norway To Open Century Old Package
  Posted 19 days ago with 127 member flags
Blame The Real Bad Guys - The Powers Behind Super Powers
  Posted 18 days ago with 65 member flags
19 Yr Old Hostage Gunned Down By Police While Escaping Captor
  Posted 8 days ago with 53 member flags
DHS Source: “It’s going hot”
  Posted 14 days ago with 49 member flags
Police Shoot Another 911 Caller In Her Own Backyard
  Posted 19 days ago with 46 member flags
The Oatmeal\'s Tesla Fundraiser Pushes Past $1.1M
  Posted 15 days ago with 44 member flags