Good day.
You also seem to be utterly intrigued by these eventual solutions for hundreds of very interesting possible main construction problems.
I asked myself, if called out to construct something so massive as the Great pyramid, why not start with a limestone "knoll" with the right
dimensions?
Just find a limestone knolly hill, which top reaches a height of let's say about 36 meters, f.ex. at the level of the (later) Great Chamber. (1/3
high, or even higher, 2/3 high)
Then start cutting away blocks from the sides of the knoll, untill the 4 sides have the perfect pyramid shape.
These cut away core blocks can be used later to build up those sides again.
Another additional idea could have been to implement the 2 ramps in the original shape of the -to be first found- candidate for a core limestone
"knoll". Limestone and not harder rock, since it had to be cut and grinded the simplest way to the desired shape.
These 2 ramps could be cut into blocks at the end of their usefullness, to be used as the last building blocks at the top.
And I say it again, the ramps would never go higher than the level of the Great Chamber. Because otherwise the angle of ascend would be too steep for
men and animals who pushed, pulled or slid their loads up that ramp. And the amount of material needed to build a ramp going at last, all the way to
the apex, with still a climable angle, would be so immense, that it would cost too much time and especially labour, compared to jacking up of all
blocks needed to construct the leftover 2/3 or 1/3 of the top of the pyramid, above the Great Chamber level.
This would also explain those 1700 years difference in carbon dating of blocks and mortar at the top or the bottom of the Great pyramid. The limestone
from the quarry and the knoll could be precipitated in slightly different era (on a relatively very short geological scale).
I hereby assume that the carbon dating researcher mentioned by me, used the organisms embedded in the limestone blocks to determine the blocks origins
in time.
(I deleted the opened tab to that scientist yesterday, but I will find it back shortly in my History files, and post it. It hinted to solid research
anyway. I hope to find his online reference to a wellknown scientific publisher also ofcourse. Never rely on hearsay alone.)
The quarry for core limestone blocks was situated about 500 yards away from the south side of the Great pyramid, so let's assume that the base rock
material under the pyramid was also limestone. That would be one of the more important wishes for an egyptian architect who just got the greatest
contract of his life.
It would cut his construction time enormously.
Why do I still have that nagging feeling, that in fact the -whole- pyramid was made of blocks, started from a flattened base plate?
The flattening of that base plate was surely aided by swallow trenches cut in the rough limestone base plate, which were filled with water and formed
a raster of a perfectly level surface, to which the limestone was grinded down, while the water in it was refreshed to compensate for evaporation in
the hot sun, to the level of 2 exactly leveled measurement points near the water inlet, which were no more than about 5 meter apart, and thus kept the
whole maze of trenches exactly horizontally level.
The same water out of those trenches (or secondary ones) was probably also used to aid the grinding process. And to wash away most of the finer dust
and grinded material.
Perhaps this pharao Khufu had quite a clear idea of possible humane resurrection techniques in the far future, and he perhaps also had found some
indications in his vast kingdom that this technique had existed before on earth, much earlier.
Which really convinced him to be sure to build such a FORTRESS for his mummified body, that even 10.000 years passing would not interfere with his
inevitable resurrection.
And that ultimately, the mummified body of one, but probably MANY pharaos and dignitaries will be found deep under the Great pyramid.
Because I assume there must be a few very important reasons for the one(s) who were ordering this pyramid erection, and who were the real ones behind
this specific pyramids construction plan.
However, if resurrection was the sole reason for this pharao, why didn't he cut a km's long tunnel in a limestone mountain and filled the first 100
meter up with debris?
And thus created a very safe tomb.
But that was not his intent, he wanted to be found at the right time. He didn't believe in the mumbo-jumbo from his priests about direct
resurrection, or at least had a healthy mistrust in priests, and opted for the more sophisticated gamble.
So that's why he needed such an immense artefact on top of his grave, that it would survive the eons and would attract the attention of endless
amounts of researchers, untill a place in time that DNA techniques were so sophisticated, that any minuscule amount of human tissue could be used to
resurrect him.
He gambled that when humanity was able to dig him up, they would also be able to reconstruct his body.
He probably did not take in account, that his (then present) ego would not be duplicated in that eventual process, and it would not be HIM, in
effect.
PS : Well, mr Prevos also had the same "knoll" idea, I just see :
The core masonry consists of large blocks of local limestone taken from the nearby quarries and built around and over a rocky knoll. The size of
the knoll cannot be determined, since it is completely covered by the pyramid.
edit to add
link
[edit on 15-8-2006 by masqua]
Editted in for later reference to the names of internal rooms and shafts, this is a drawing from dr. Hawass, a plan of the Great Pyramid :
Source: Secret doors inside the Great Pyramid by dr
Awass.
Take note of the craftmansship of those who chisselled these small shafts.
Intreagueing question what they were meant for.
[edit on 15/8/06 by LaBTop]