Pyramids at Giza were there BEFORE the Egyptians got there., page 5

Originally posted by Essan

Originally posted by Cowboy1

I remain puzzled as to why we have not seen more descriptive evidence and as to why, after such magnificent achievements, they just returned to their normal way of life and neither built nor produced anything that even came close to these achievements in the ensuing centuries.

One might say much the same of the great European cathedrals - incredible works of craftmanship the likes of which have never been repeated. Why? Why are modern cathedrals such dull, plain, simply structures compared with the likes of Chartres - a massive structure towering above the landscape? Maybe the old cathedrals were built by aliens and we no longer have the technology to replicate them?

Chartres:-

St Mary's, San Fransisco:-

Yes I totally agree I think the entire city of Rome was built by Aliens or from people from the future traveling in time.

I sometimes feel that people don't want to look at the facts with an open mind when the facts point to something that makes them unconfortable. Must of the ideas ("Novels") that came out in the 1800's about the Pyramids, are beautifull fantasies with an racist undertone. Some of the great Minds of those years were Racist.

Why is this important?

Well if we can sit here and understand that until this day they are people that think that the Egyptians were white skin humans. This started back in the days as soon as Arqueologist started examining the Pyramids and I guess it never ocurred to them That THIS COULD HAVE BEEN BUILD BY COLORED PEOPLE.

I don't mean to say that there are not some serius questions about how did a Civilization so long ago had lets say the ability to build such a structure, without any heavy machinery or computers to help on the calculations

A book called the Sirius Mystery By Robert Temple, exposes "new" scientific evidence of an alien contatc 5000 years ago. Is somewhat of a heavy read. The author brings more than those 10 points specified in this thread. All of them very valid and for some we may never have an answer for. Arquelogy is not a time machine. We could however, theorize the way the pyramids were build or for that matter the place of Egyptian Civilization in Our History. But if you are going to theorize please do so without preconcived judgements. Here is what not to do, from The Sirius Mystery first 58 pages:

But just as no London gentlemen's club wishes to have a savage in a g-string waving his spear and poisoned arrows about in the members' lounge, so the interstellar club is unlikely to plug us straight into the circuits as a fully-fledge member.

If you don't see something wrong with this analogy than is better if you take some time out from researching this subject and try to learn a bit more about recent history something like the way the bush admin. does not want to hear about global warning, is not that the biologists dont have a huge amount of data to validate the argument. The Problem again is that there is no time machine so they cant predict exactly when and how the earth climate is going to change.

The must surprising thing is that although diferent theories about who, why or for what the pyramids were build? the Arqueologist are pretty much in concensus about the answers of all those questions.

I don't want to get of topic but Stonehenge has sarsen-stone blocks (weighing up to 50 tons each). Sarsen is a very hard form of sandstone found particularly on the Marlborough Downs some 18 miles to the north.

Hey guys anybody from the UK can tell me if people think Stonehenge was build by aliens? Maybe some people do. In my opinion, I don't think so, all the evidence leads me to beileve that it was built approximately 3000 B.C by Neolithic agrarians