It appears that unless I agree with you, and your expert sources, then I don't know what I am talking about.
ah so youve gone from crying foul at an imagined personal attack to claiming that I support people who I havent mentioned purely because of your own
dislike for them
this is actually a psycological disorder common amongst people losing an argument badly
its called transference
so you turned up in this thread making claims that have been totally disproven about weights of blocks and modern day cranes and you then claim that
the best source you have is flinders Petrie who has been dead for 64 years
being 64 years out of the field does actually mean that hes antiquated and totally outdated and many of his once accepted theories have been proven
he was a good egyptoologist in his day but that day has been over for far more than half a century
as of yet you havent had a day yet
the way you are going digging yourself deeper and deeper in instead of just being mature and admitting you were wrong is not going to get you
you seem to think that you have asked questions of me in the last three posts
heres what you actually offered in those posts
1) an article already discredited by crank author J Jochmans
2) a request as to what you should do to improve your performance which i answered correctly stating always consider the source and which you then
rejected by naming two pseudoscientists who arent one
3) a claim that you have been personally attacked with a sentence by me that began with "please"
Now I suggest you go back to that first post and see where you went wrong by posting information that you later stated was "your uneducated opinion"
pretending it was factual and then see where you have gone wrong in every post since by attempting to discredit me when all I have done is asked you
to follow the forum motto of "deny ignorance"
If you can't see this very clearly BG then I'm afraid you are ignorant
and thats not a personal attack either
its me stating an already proven hypothesis
[edit on 14-11-2006 by Marduk]