Originally posted by Byrd
Originally posted by Shane
The Great Pyramid was created under the instruction of the Lord God Almighty, and Enoch was the Job Site Forman, Architect, and Surveyor.
That's not going to work, either, unless you reinterpret most of the Bible (sorry if I sound contentious here... I'm in a hurry and certainly don't
mean to sound rude.)
More later. Must run.
Thanks for your thoughts Byrd
I do not take what you offered as Rude. If you are lacking "time" then this is the wrong topic for you right now, since it truely is a topic of
time. Past, present and future.
So in defesne of my assertion, I offer this.
You have noted Pillar, is exactly that, and I would agree, if the Chaldean word natsa was the word used in Isaiah 19:19.
Natsa means "to station", both literally and figuratively, ie appointed, deputy, erect, establish, lay (as in layout), officer, pillar, present, to
But since the word use is matstsebah, which means "something stationed", (as in a memorial or stone), and we all ready have the memorial or stone
identified as an Alter, there is no sense in misspeaking this verse.
There is an Alter in the Midst, "something stationed" at the borders there of. It is not denoting two seperate items. Just the Great Pyramid
Your confirmation of the dating of Isaiah's service is quite accurate. It should also be noted this Oracle against Egypt, is a inditement of their
ways as well as prophesy of what they will return to. The Lord of Hosts.
So, I agree 100% on what you noted the Egyptians views BECAME in respects to Worshiping. Isaiah 19 covered this clearly.
This is mostly due to the satanic influences which took place in the days of Noah. The Book of Enoch goes to great descriptive lenghts to express this
clearly what these Fallen did. Deciet, Deception and Confusion, along with Vainty, Pride, and Idol Worship.
it's no wonder the Egyptians revolted for this god or that diety, but again, what else can you expect from them.
You also noted "Remember that meridians were "invented" in the 1600's or so. You've got a "cart before the horse" here."
And this is part of the point Byrd. 10000 years ago, (just to pick a date), the constructor of the Great Pyramid placed this exactly there. In the
today, there is no other location on earth, that this could be accomplished. The exact center of the land mass of the Globe is the exact placement or
matstsebah of the Great Pyramid. Again, is this a coincidence?
Sorry but this was the best Map I could pull "QUICKLY" that noted specific to the Great Pyramid. You can see, North to South is truly covering a lot
of land mass, and likewise, East to West.
(Although I would like to have some indication of what the lattitude that runs thru Alaska to the far East portion of the old USSR would be. This
looks like a lot of land mass as well. But it still looks close, since East covers from China thru the Mideast, across the top of Africa, and thru the
I southern States)
You noted "I think you'll find that isn't true. And Petrie has been very much discounted by the archaeologists of the time and by everyone since
then. He was a terrible scholar."
I think you would have been correct, if you used Petrie's own words.
"The Father of William Flinders Petrie (the Father of Modern Egyptology) was a frequent quest at the home of Piazzi Smyth, and may have even come
close to marrying Smyth's daughter. He did in fact meet and apparently court the woman he would marry in their home. Furthermore, Petrie wrote in his
"Seventy years in Archaeology" (1932):
… A new stir arose when one day I brought back from Smith's bookstall, in 1866, a volume by Piazzi Smyth, Our Inheritance in the Great Pyramid. The
views, in conjunction with his old friendship for the author, strongly attracted my father, and for some years I was urged on in what seemed so
enticing a field of coincidence. I little thought how, fifteen years later, I should reach the "ugly little fact which killed the beautiful theory";
but it was this interest which led my father to encourage me to go out and do the survey of the Great Pyramid; of that, later on.
By this, what Petrie means is that he was influenced by Smyth's work, but latter scientifically disproved some of his theories. It was actually
Petrie who first coined the term, "pyramidiot" to describe what he saw as a quasi-religious cult."
I understand what it is that you are implying Byrd. Although I have not found myself, what "That Ugly Little Fact" maybe, I have presumed it
reflects the Star Alignment of the 2400 BC dates, when his intent was to prove an Older Construction.
I like noted, I am not closed minded, and if evidence is offered to the contrary, I will review. But is this evidence or the arguements of those who
have reputations at stake, or even one who was discouraged when faced with a Fact against his theory?
My use of a Unit of measure may have been hasty of me. I presumed one discussing this topic would have known this reference, and I apologize, for not
detailing this and making this Unit of Measure clear.
Your indication of a Cubit measure is 100% Byrd.
Pyramid Inch = 1.0011 present inches, and 1.0010846752 British Inches.
Pyramid Cubit or Sacred Cubit = 25 pyramid inches.
So I end this here, in respects to support for my view. With everything that can be said about this topic, it is with confidence, The Great Pyramid is
Unique above all other such constructions. No Egyptian has ever able to duplicate this, and to this day, No One have. Is it difficult then, not to
consider options outside of what Idol Worshippers and petty dieties and godlike bootlickers have pushed down our throats. They are quicker to dismiss,
than they are to offer evidence.
I just wish to find the truth, and as Mulder was fond of noting, the Truth is out there.
Have a good day Byrd, and thanks for your response.