It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pyramids at Giza were there BEFORE the Egyptians got there.

page: 17
3
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 09:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by undo
Professor Naville was the one who claimed the stones were in the vicinity of 100 tons in some cases. Is he lying?


If he disagrees with the majority viewpoint which is -always- of a pessimistic, doubtful nature, then according to the majority he'd be incorrect, thus wrong.

It's funny how people who dedicate their professional lives to this stuff are often classified as being quacks, crazy, or uneducated by 'forum nazis' , who are always right and will not say otherwise.

Those people's arguements/opinions are founded on strong pessimism and what i like to call humanist over-realism, which is answering any unknown question with the notion that..

1)human beings have never been created, we just 'evolved' all the way, no acceleration of the process or anything.
2)humans have never been in actual physical contact with 'aliens'.
3)aliens have never visited earth, since its existance.
4)everything on earth not naturally occuring was created by humans only, regardless of the difficulty involved (these systems for building such large buildings that humans supposedly used are hard to replicate to this day and the labor involved astounds us.. the amount of humans, weight carrying, calculations and time).
5)aliens will never visit earth.
6)all signs point to aliens of intelligent nature not existing.
7)all religon is a lie. all stories are fake, none are founded on anything factual or credible that actually happened. same with every myth and legend, pagan or egyptian, or mayan or whatever. its 100% mind control, we're actually fungus growing on a rock with an afterlife no different than small insects; none.
8)if we havent discovered a planet yet, with unrefutable fury it does not exist!
9)this whole notion of reality is an anomaly and a joke. when our pointless lives are over we will be in a permanent non-existant 'state of mind', people don't actually have an essence of God or a soul inside of them.
10)there is no God.
11)Stone Henge and the Great Giza Pyramid, as well as the Mayan one that is the largest on earth (at the base) and any other incredibly ancient monolith was fully constructed by primitive loin cloth wearing star-gazing barbarous humans. We are like superheros or something.
12)There was no Flood, beyond a minor one occuring near the Tigris/Euphrates. Despite that all cultures on earth have a similar legend of a major flood, see rule #7. It must all be a lie. Stupid cavemen an their stories.
13)Agriculture just APPEARED out of thin air into the human brain, which is fully capable of doing anything on this earth, considering we are the end all be all, most intelligent beings to exist. Theres no aliens or God that is higher than us. Those dont exist, we do. All material evidence pertaining to anything otherwise is false and discredited.
14)all ancient tablets have been misinterpreted, and the misinterpreted stories we have from them are not true, just make believe mumbo jumbo. see rule #7.
15)There was no exodus from egypt, the plagues never occured, and if so were a freak anomaly of nature. Everything in religon is a lie see rule #7.
16)The only possible considerable explanation for ANYTHING, end all be all, of the Earth, of Science, the laws of Physics and everything 'Western Civilization' has gathered up over the centuries like a scrapbook is explainable through natural occuring things or freak anomolies.
17)A comet is not coming to hit our planet - surely NASA would notify the world population shortly before their doom - that would be real pretty, worldwide anarchy. So believe everything you see/hear/red from NASA; they are more worthy than Biblical texts.
18)A planetary body is not coming to hit our planet, graze it, or passby it. This will not happen around 2012ish, or after, and all who theorize on this interpretation of Sumerian myth is misinterpreting it, see rule #12.

These are the 18 steps, would someone like to label this set of beliefs?

[edit on 24-9-2006 by runetang]




posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 09:15 AM
link   
I'll take Humanist Athiesm for $1000 Bob.

You've hit the daily double!!!



posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 09:16 AM
link   
as opposed to this next set of rules that list is very credible

1) god created the earth in seven days
2) god is ommipotent and invisible and lives in the sky somewhere
3) everything the bible says is true especially the heavily edited modern versions
4) all scientists are wrong
5) god loves you so much that if you make an error he will send you to hell to be agonizingly tortured for ever and ever
6) god sent his only son to die for our sins which we havent committed yet
7) the Nazis who murdered 6 million jews were evil
8 ) the catholics who murdered 500 million men women and children are good
9) any religion that worships any other god is completely wrong and they are all going to christian hell for it
10) Noah had an ark the size of two football fields which he managed to fit two fo every creature of earth into shortly after god decalred that he would kill every living thing on earth but remember god is omnipotent so it must be that we just don't understand how why or even when he did it

etc
etc



posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 10:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Marduk
as opposed to this next set of rules that list is very credible

1) god created the earth in seven days




Six days... He rested on the seventh... I guess he tires after a week of work just like the critters he created in his image! So much for omipotence. And what he do after that first week? go into retirement? Or is he still in the seventh day and still resting? And if that's the case, what happens when he goes back to work on Monday morning?



2) god is ommipotent and


WRONG Bible says he goofed making us, thats why he had to wipe us out with the flood
And can he make a rock bigger than he can lift? Yes its an old question, but still valid...



...invisible


WRONG Bible clearly states he walked and talked with many of the characters in the bible and there is a good reference before the destruction of Sodom and Gamorah where god and two angles where refered to as "three men approached" Very visible...




and lives in the sky somewhere



Now THAT statement makes him an Alien in the truest sence of the word ET Extra terrestrial IE NOT OF THIS EARTH.... same goes for the angles etc.. Since Satan et al
were cast to the Earth, that makes em landed immigrants, only need to know if Bush gave em a green card




3) everything the bible says is true especially the heavily edited modern versions


Very TRUE, but you have to be able to interpret it correctly... after all they all talked in parabels and used "behold this is what I saw" a lot so thta gives us reliable eye witnesses... that were mostly shepherds...



4) all scientists are wrong


MOSTLY TRUE Established elderly one for sure... Remeber Clarke's first law...
"When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong."



5) god loves you so much that if you make an error he will send you to hell to be agonizingly tortured for ever and ever



Loves you ONLY if you are willing to be a blind obiedient little sheep that will grovel at his feet for eternity and give up all free will... a free will that since he created us in his image he gave us... Yuppers that makes perfectly good sensce alright...:shk:




6) god sent his only son to die for our sins which we havent committed yet


Oh come on now surely you have done something wrong in your llife? No one is perfect... ever take a pen home from work?



7) the Nazis who murdered 6 million jews were evil



I hear tell the Pope supported him... funny how he didn't persecute Catholics... and German went under the banner "Got mit Uns" [God with Us] so He was rooting for both sizes it seems...




8 ) the catholics who murdered 500 million men women and children are good


Naturally It WAS done in the name of God... so that makes it OKAY... which means that Osama et al are also GOOD and Herr Bush is evil...



9) any religion that worships any other god is completely wrong and they are all going to christian hell for it


Well yes that is VERY TRUE... but who says Christian hell is a bad place? See Christian heaven is where you get to float around the clouds playing a harp all day and worshiping at the feet of your Lord... I have never heard ANY description of Heaven as anything other than that... Now to me that would be Hell... and boring too

Whereas the other place has all the free thinkers, the naughty women and the other fun stuff...




10) Noah had an ark the size of two football fields which he managed to fit two fo every creature of earth into shortly after god decalred that he would kill every living thing on earth but remember god is omnipotent so it must be that we just don't understand how why or even when he did it




Now see? this is PURE DISINFORMATION and You Mr Marduck have fallen into it hook line and sinker... either that or its an example that you have not really read the religious text...

I really wish people would get this simple little fact RIGHT

It WASN'T TWO of every beast...

I qoute...

Genisis 7
1) Then the Lord said to Noah, ‘Go into the ark, you and all your household, for I have seen that you alone are righteous before me in this generation.

2) Take with you seven pairs of all clean animals, the male and its mate; and a pair of the animals that are not clean, the male and its mate; 3and seven pairs of the birds of the air also, male and female, to keep their kind alive on the face of all the earth.

In older versions you will see that it says two pair of the unclean.... but in either case its 14 not 2 of the clean beasts...

This is a perfect example of how the mainstream accepted version of things becomes distorted and believed as "absolute truth" They still teach the "two" in Sunday schools.

If they can't even get a simple thing like that right when it is clearly written, and you can't get staright answers from priests... how can one take anything they say seriously?


With all do respect, perhaps you might qoute more accurately in the future?



:shk:

[edit on 24-9-2006 by zorgon]



posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 10:48 AM
link   
Marduk,

What's your opinion about the pictures and info I provided on the topic of the huge stones of the Osirieon?



posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 11:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by undo



Wow, good thing this doesn't look anything like Solomon's Temple...


plainbookofmormon.com...



posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 11:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe


Wow, good thing this doesn't look anything like Solomon's Temple...


plainbookofmormon.com...



Well now that's some food for thought. Did you know the huge laver, the brazen sea, was also called "Apsu", which was simply a later term for "Abzu"?



posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 11:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe


Wow, good thing this doesn't look anything like Solomon's Temple...


plainbookofmormon.com...



Originally posted by undo
Well now that's some food for thought. Did you know the huge laver, the brazen sea, was also called "Apsu", which was simply a later term for "Abzu"?


Reference for that please, Undo. :-)



posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 11:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by Odium


Reference for that please, Undo. :-)


A miniature world

The chambers which surrounded the Holy Place in Solomon's Temple are said in 1 Chr. 28:12 to have been storehouses for the sacred treasure. These are paralleled in Babylonian and Egyptian temples by similar chambers, which surrounded the naos, or hypostyle hall, and were used for similar purposes. The "molten sea" finds its parallel in Babylonian temples in a great basin called the "apsu" ('deep'). As the ziggurat typified a mountain, so the apsu typified the sea. The Temple thus became a miniature world. This apsu was used as early as the time of Gudea and continued in use till the end of Babylonian history; it was made of stone and was elaborately decorated. In Solomon's Temple there was nothing to correspond to the hypostyle hall of an Egyptian temple; but this feature was introduced into Solomon's palace. The "house of the forest of Lebanon" and the "porch of pillars" remind one strongly of the outer and the inner hypostyle hall of an Egyptian temple.

en.wikipedia.org...'s_Temple



posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 11:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by undo
Well now that's some food for thought. Did you know the huge laver, the brazen sea, was also called "Apsu", which was simply a later term for "Abzu"?


Is that brazen like in brass like?

BTW I am here now Undo you had a question about "Houston we have a problem" I believe?


[edit on 24-9-2006 by zorgon]



posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 11:25 AM
link   
Step One has been completed.

Now, for Step Two you will explain how this has anything to do with the Pyramids of Egypt being built before the Egyptians got there.

Thanks. :-)



posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 11:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by undo
Professor Naville was the one who claimed the stones were in the vicinity of 100 tons in some cases. Is he lying?

I would not say so. What I am saying is what exactly is the meaning of "...in some cases..."?

Anyway, it was Marduk's question. Not rereading it, I am under the impression that he was asking for information about how many such stones there were. That's all. I personally don't have a problem with Seti placing a hundred, even a thousand, 100-ton granite blocks there.

Your photo and sketch are helpful, I think, in answering what Marduk asked.


Originally posted by runetang
...Those people's arguements/opinions are founded on strong pessimism and what i like to call humanist over-realism, which is answering any unknown question with the notion that..

1)human beings have never been created, we just 'evolved' all the way, no acceleration of the process or anything.
2)humans have never been in actual physical contact with 'aliens'.
3)aliens have never visited earth, since its existance.
4)everything on earth not naturally occuring was created by humans only, regardless of the difficulty involved (these systems for building such large buildings that humans supposedly used are hard to replicate to this day and the labor involved astounds us.. the amount of humans, weight carrying, calculations and time).
5)aliens will never visit earth.
6)all signs point to aliens of intelligent nature not existing.
7)all religon is a lie. all stories are fake, none are founded on anything factual or credible that actually happened. same with every myth and legend, pagan or egyptian, or mayan or whatever. its 100% mind control, we're actually fungus growing on a rock with an afterlife no different than small insects; none.
8)if we havent discovered a planet yet, with unrefutable fury it does not exist!
9)this whole notion of reality is an anomaly and a joke. when our pointless lives are over we will be in a permanent non-existant 'state of mind', people don't actually have an essence of God or a soul inside of them.
10)there is no God.
11)Stone Henge and the Great Giza Pyramid, as well as the Mayan one that is the largest on earth (at the base) and any other incredibly ancient monolith was fully constructed by primitive loin cloth wearing star-gazing barbarous humans. We are like superheros or something.
12)There was no Flood, beyond a minor one occuring near the Tigris/Euphrates. Despite that all cultures on earth have a similar legend of a major flood, see rule #7. It must all be a lie. Stupid cavemen an their stories.
13)Agriculture just APPEARED out of thin air into the human brain, which is fully capable of doing anything on this earth, considering we are the end all be all, most intelligent beings to exist. Theres no aliens or God that is higher than us. Those dont exist, we do. All material evidence pertaining to anything otherwise is false and discredited.
14)all ancient tablets have been misinterpreted, and the misinterpreted stories we have from them are not true, just make believe mumbo jumbo. see rule #7.
15)There was no exodus from egypt, the plagues never occured, and if so were a freak anomaly of nature. Everything in religon is a lie see rule #7.
16)The only possible considerable explanation for ANYTHING, end all be all, of the Earth, of Science, the laws of Physics and everything 'Western Civilization' has gathered up over the centuries like a scrapbook is explainable through natural occuring things or freak anomolies.
17)A comet is not coming to hit our planet - surely NASA would notify the world population shortly before their doom - that would be real pretty, worldwide anarchy. So believe everything you see/hear/red from NASA; they are more worthy than Biblical texts.
18)A planetary body is not coming to hit our planet, graze it, or passby it. This will not happen around 2012ish, or after, and all who theorize on this interpretation of Sumerian myth is misinterpreting it, see rule #12.

These are the 18 steps, would someone like to label this set of beliefs?



Glad you asked.

How about "Straw Men on Parade." Or maybe "How I Rationalize the Crazy Voices in my Head."

Harte



posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 11:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by undo
Well now that's some food for thought. Did you know the huge laver, the brazen sea, was also called "Apsu", which was simply a later term for "Abzu"?


Is that brazen like in brass like?

BTW I am here now Undo you had a question about "Houston we have a prroblem" I believe?


Bronze, I believe. Okee day.

[edit on 24-9-2006 by undo]



posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 04:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Odium
Step One has been completed.

Now, for Step Two you will explain how this has anything to do with the Pyramids of Egypt being built before the Egyptians got there.

Thanks. :-)


Erm, can't really. Dunno how we got off on this tangent.



posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 04:57 PM
link   
Well, maybe not so much of a tangent. Wasn't the Osireon discovered 50 feet below another structure? And no other structure in Egypt incorporated such large granite blocks?

Isn't that evidence that the more elaborate structures were built earlier than the later ones?



posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 06:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
Well, maybe not so much of a tangent. Wasn't the Osireon discovered 50 feet below another structure? And no other structure in Egypt incorporated such large granite blocks?

Isn't that evidence that the more elaborate structures were built earlier than the later ones?


Not exactly. It's not elaborate, but lack of elaborate that seems to date the stones. In other words, the plain central chamber, separates it from the highly decorated "A" and "B" chambers, making it appear to have originated at a different time than the "A" and "B" chambers. The theory being that Seti I discovered the Osirieon during excavations for the foundation of his own temple, refurbished it, added the "A" and "B" chambers and tunnel, incorporating it into his complex. This appears to date the Central chamber of the Osirieon to the time of the GP and other undecorated, monolithic monuments in Egypt. How old that is, is the question of this thread.



posted on Sep, 25 2006 @ 11:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Marduk



Then again, there are so many writings (both ancient and recent) that refer to beings out of this world visiting us and gifting us with advanced technology

thats funny because I have never read any ancient texts that claim anything close to that
just lots of recent mistranslations that do
perhaps you could provide a link to your claims at some point otherwise its just so much hearsay/rubbish/gospell/bs (delete where applicable)


Not a problem Marduk. It's quite easy to find links to references on such. Primarily it is with the Vedic literature that I am fascinated. Let your journey begin. I realize that you appear to be one of those "I won't believe it until I SEE it" kind of person.

It is either that or you simply try to dispute any and all proof that points to something that will change this world completely.

There are a few options explaining your stance as such. A) Either you know the things stated here to be truth and you are being paid to dispute them to try and make people look bad; B) You are simply a no-nonsense person that just wants HARD proof; C) You just like to argue for the sake of arguing.


Either way I always enjoy your posts because it forces people to dig deeper. I will continue to dig for actual excerpts from translations of various texts that DO INDEED speak of "out of this world" involvement and technology.

Here is a simple link that talks to the many descriptions of flying machines from thousands of years ago. Also, I am currently looking for a particular story from these texts that I read that described an all out "war in the skies" between these flying ships that utilized beams of fire to destroy things.

www.hinduwisdom.info...


Just fun research my friend. If anything it shows that our human imagination was just as good tens of thousands of years ago as it is today with the so-called "new" UFO phenomenon.

As always, my sincerest blessings.

Mike



posted on Sep, 25 2006 @ 12:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by whylistentome

Also, I am currently looking for a particular story from these texts that I read that described an all out "war in the skies" between these flying ships that utilized beams of fire to destroy things.

Mike


The Mahabharata
of
Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa
BOOK 8

Karna-parva

www.sacred-texts.com...

The Mahabarata

SECTION CLXXXIV

(Drona-vadha Parva)

www.sacred-texts.com...

[edit on 25-9-2006 by undo]



posted on Sep, 25 2006 @ 12:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by whylistentome

There are a few options explaining your stance as such. A) Either you know the things stated here to be truth and you are being paid to dispute them to try and make people look bad; B) You are simply a no-nonsense person that just wants HARD proof; C) You just like to argue for the sake of arguing.




I vote "A"




Here is a simple link that talks to the many descriptions of flying machines from thousands of years ago. Also, I am currently looking for a particular story from these texts that I read that described an all out "war in the skies" between these flying ships that utilized beams of fire to destroy things.


Thanks for that link... it will save me some hunting
And I do hope you find that Vedic "War of the Worlds" text... I found hints in the description in one text that was most certainly an atomic type explosion and I sent me the link, but haven't pulled it out yet.

I am working on the "War of the Worlds" from the Tibetan side... should have most of that together in a few days...


As to seeing the truth... I have a hunch [a theory really] that cosmic powers keep people that are not ready from seeing the truth. I thgink I may start a thread on that and see others opinions on that. It has to do with that whole being "enlightened" bit before you can achieve understanding. Of course those that don't have it yet will call those that do crazy... its been like that all through history.

However on a bright note... it seems that right now there are more enlighted people than ever before so perhaps there is hope for the planet and humanity yet



posted on Sep, 25 2006 @ 12:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by undo

The Mahabarata

SECTION CLXXXIV

(Drona-vadha Parva)

www.sacred-texts.com...


Yup thats the one... You snuck in while I was typing



new topics

top topics



 
3
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join