Why Creationism is wrong and Evolution is right, page 1

Originally posted by tommytrouble

(Wrong) You can still walk along a line that stretches to and from infinity.
Which came first, the (chicken or the egg) answer: who gives a rats a$$

(Wrong) The Universe did not "Start" it has ALWAYS been......... Ta'da
Big Bang....Big Crunch....Big Bang.........Big Crunch......etc......etc........
Which came first the Big Bang or the Big Crunch............Who gives a .... LOL

But if a "Being" Created the Universe then why not the FSM????
www.venganza.org/index.htm
It seems he has just the right number of Noodly Appendages to get the job down in say.....................6 Days! with time to rest on the 7th Day! Ahhhhhhuuuuuummmmmmm........Thank you FSM!.........let us all pray! LMAO

Before you go telling me I know nothing of science... here's some food for thought:

You can't tell me that it's possible to walk along a line that streches from infinity to infinity. First, you have to prove to me, or rationally suggest without much doubt, that the universe is indeed an infinate place. I have reasons to believe that the universe isn't designed to deal with infinities. Here's a little story I use to demonstrate that point:

Did you hear about the library of Infinity? Let's go check it out. I heard they have an infinate selection of blue books, and an infinate selection of red books. I'd like to get a red book. Let's say I check a red book out. How many red books are left? Well... infinity... hmm. Let's say I check out 2 blue books on top of my red book. Are there now more red books in the library than blue books? Well, there should be, but there isn't... Infinities simply aren't applicable to the tangible universe.

I have reason to believe YOU are wrong about the nature of the universe. In fact, some scientists are now trying to map the universe and have a general idea of what shape they think the universe acutally is.

I may not be a scientist with a Ph.D., but I sure can tell you don't know much about science either. I've heard all of this crap before.

So since time can't be infinate, there has to be a start. As I may or may not have said, for you scientists, the second law of thermodynamics debunks your infinate oscillating model. If you apply it, your argument falls apart. By continuing to trace your idea back, you're merely sidestepping the question of where it came from. And we all know that infinate times are irrational, so may I ask you again? Which model makes more sense? One with a neccessary and independent creator, or the oscillating model?

On another note, scientists that have been mapping the universe have calculated the estimated density of the universe. It turns out, that the universe isn't dense enough to gain momentum gravitationally to pull itself back inward. The outlying matter will likely begin orbiting the center of the universe, much as our galaxy does.

Don't use profanity. It makes you look stupid.

Ryan