Why do you feel there Must be a creator?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 12-4-2006 @ 08:01 AM by Prot0n

One of many that show we were created is the balance of nature. Our creator(s) are mentioned in the oldest of texts.


Yes in the OLDEST text's, these same creators also created a flat earth and threw lightning when angered. I'm not sure if using man made mythologies really helps the case for a creator.


One part of many on the balance of nature - animals cannot live without plants and plants cannot live without animals. Without one, the balance becomes off enough where the other will die. THey must have been done under a planned action.


Why must it be so under planned action? That make's no sense at all to me and completly disregards evolution, biology etc etc.


Also, look at the dinosaurs. How could some of them have evolved into such HUGE beasts? Not to mension, that there are not any fossils that show the evolution of, say for example, a brontosourus.


There's tons of transitionary fossil's. Of course there's not all showing step by step by step by step ad infinitum. Fossils form under certain condition's, not at the whim's of those who demand it.


Another of MANY in my belief - where did the banana come from? Look at how they grow.


If I'm not mistaken, the modern banana that we eat today was created by man through vegatative sprouting or something of the sorts. Kinda like primitive GM.


Another - if we evolved, it MAY be excepted that we 'developed' an eye to detect light, but to develop 2 so we could have depth perception? Not logical to me.


Evolution of the eye has already been shown, but regardless.. why is it not logical? Depth perception allows for greater chances of survival. There's nothing indicative that two eye's can't come about naturally. Most insects have more then two eyes, talk about illogical!


However, my input is futile. This battle will continue forever and no one will ever be victorious. none of us were there to see it with our own eyes so it doesn't matter what I or anyone say here.


True in a sense, but it does matter so as to help some of us understand where your kind are comming from and possibly dispell some of the misunderstanding's. I know I did a rather crappy job in this post but eh, w.e.



reply posted on 12-4-2006 @ 10:29 AM by Dock6
We're such puny little creatures. Doesn't matter if we're able to track our beginnings back to dust on some distant star. That distant star would need to be tracked back to its origins. Then those origins would need to be tracked back. And so, back and back and back. Assuming of course that these things were linear. Doesn't matter if the Big Bang or Strings or whatever are agreed upon. What lies behind those?

Put your hands out into thin air. Are you able to create something tangible from that thin air? In fact, starting with thin air would not be starting from scratch; you'd be getting a head start if you had 'thin air' to work with. Can you imagine a nothingness so absolute that not even air existed ... no light, no darkness, no sound, nothing tangible, nothing invisible, not even 'nothing' ?

The Big Bang? The big bang of what? What was there to bang? Where did it come from? Ok. Trace that stuff back. Now where did *that* stuff originate? If you find where it originated, let's call it 'P'. Where did 'P' originate? Call it's origins 'S'. Where did 'S' originate, etc.?

Doesn't matter how far back we go; each step backwards had to originate somewhere, or in something, whether energy or matter. Even if it turns out that it's all a cycle; in effect a re-cycling: at its furthermost reaches there requires to be the one dot of energy or matter that kicked it all off. Where did that dot originate?

How can there NOT be a creator? Although for the sake of argument, you can call that creator 'dot' if you prefer.


reply posted on 12-4-2006 @ 01:18 PM by Dock6
Proton: that was my point. At the back of it all, must lie something/someone, no matter how unexpected, obvious-in-hindsight, shocking, terrifying, amusing .. whatever. To discover the ultimate source of all, may require the investigator to go through groups of 'dots' or several overseers or even several thousand. But ultimately, *some*-thing/one holds the position of 'the buck stops here'.

The journey and destination may prove laughable: we may discover we literally *are* pond-life within a universe within a universe within .... etc.

My grandfather, when he was young, apparently speculated that we may be nothing more grand than the imaginings of a bug flying through space. His speculations have stood the test of time: these days many suspect our lives may be an illusion; self-generated or externally imposed.

Sometimes it pays to turn it upside down to see what falls out. It occurred to me several years ago, that what we consider our dream-life may in fact be the reality. If so, it is our 'real' life that is the dream. And there's no certainty that either exists in matter, despite appearances.

A self-proclaimed schizophrenic I used to chat with online a few years ago stated one night that we are god's brain cells. It had the ring of truth. We all seem to be connected: we can affect each other via mental means: mass hysteria seems to be a proven fact (one which the NWO appears to be attempting to utilize in order to fast-track bird-flu): we can affect each other for good or ill over long distances: we can pick up other's thoughts, dreams, etc. So it may be that far from being a mass of separate individuals, as we believe, we may instead be a colony, similar to a jelly fish or branch of coral. The entire six billion of us may be nothing more than bacteria in god's gut or comprising a miniscule fleck of plaque on god's tooth.

Or ..... we may be merely debris, unimportant remnants of a larger enterprise. For example, we may be the result of a fleck of dandruff from the head of something. That fleck may have be blown by solar winds to earth, or may have been dropped while the host detoured to our own or a nearby planet, in order to go to the toilet. The host moved on, never dreaming that debris from his head (or feces) would result in creatures (calling themselves 'mankind') which would eventually develop to believe they have a role in the big-picture ... and hold a personal relationship with the host.


reply posted on 12-4-2006 @ 05:43 PM by Prot0n

Proton: that was my point. At the back of it all, must lie something/someone, no matter how unexpected, obvious-in-hindsight, shocking, terrifying, amusing .. whatever. To discover the ultimate source of all, may require the investigator to go through groups of 'dots' or several overseers or even several thousand. But ultimately, *some*-thing/one holds the position of 'the buck stops here'.


Agreed, sort of. But what is there to indicate that something must have been intelligent and must have done what it did in our behalf?


The journey and destination may prove laughable: we may discover we literally *are* pond-life within a universe within a universe within .... etc.


Could be, but untill there's some sort of evidence suggesting this I wouldn't hold fast to the idea as other's have.


My grandfather, when he was young, apparently speculated that we may be nothing more grand than the imaginings of a bug flying through space. His speculations have stood the test of time: these days many suspect our lives may be an illusion; self-generated or externally imposed.


Another idea I wouldn't hold fast to till there's more evidence in support of it. Most of those sort of idea's appear to be mainly philosophical to me.


Sometimes it pays to turn it upside down to see what falls out. It occurred to me several years ago, that what we consider our dream-life may in fact be the reality. If so, it is our 'real' life that is the dream. And there's no certainty that either exists in matter, despite appearances.


Religion, any religion really, has always been the foremost widely held belief. Scienctific discoveries are essentially turning it upside down. It's kind of funny, your not the first to mention something like this in regards to those sort of belief systems. Modern science is technically a recent development in human history. It's those holding on to the 'old belief systems' that are denying the evidence at hand.

I won't quote the rest as it's all the same basic idea and mostly philosophical. There's nothing to indicate that this would even be possible and given what we know as of now, I find it highly improbable to be true.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



EVOLUTION - Did YOU Know?
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags
"I was raised an atheist"- Professor František Vyskočil
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
The meaning or point of existence or life
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags
Sand Castles and Science
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags