It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mr. Bush, We Know What You Did That Summer !

page: 4
0
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 11:35 AM
link   
Griff,

Sorry, I wasn't clear. My neighbor who works for the nyc sanitation department was one of the drivers who, along with the rest of the nyc sanitation department put in hours of overtime trasporting the debris to the landfill in staten island, which caused traffic on the west shore expressway for approximately 2-3 weeks.

Any staten islander can tell you of the line of sanitation trucks going to the landfill. I am going to look for the picture that was on the front page of the local paper, if i can find it.

The point of my story is, I live here, I saw what happened.

Thank you for your comment on my brother, as of this date his health is not affected. He was one of the funeral directors collecting remains for identification.




posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 11:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by tommy1701
To Lazurus,

You site Charlie Sheen and Alex Jones. Lets see, Charlie sheen who had been arrested how many times for Drunk & Disorderly, Charlie Sheen who spent how long trying to sleep with porn star jenna jamison? Charlie sheen who Cheated on his wife Denise Richards. I'm supposed to believe this person of such high moral standards.


and it is rather suspicious that the only links that come up on Google, point to those exact articles... instead of any reference to 9-11...
Yeah, attack the source... keep at it...

Just remember... You are listening to a confirmed alcholic and ex-coke head, whose wife killed her high school boyfriend in a very suspicious after drinking party accident (they were in separate cars), and whose father is suspected of being the origin of the Iran contra illegal activities...

I think I take Charlies word...
(sorry to get off point, but wanted to make the point of dont attack the source)



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 11:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by bsbray11
Are those flashes still exploding fire extinguishers and hair spray, Zed, or have you read the responses to your posts on that thread yet?

I'll just clear up a couple things.

First, I didn't claim that the flashes were anything. The post made was stating that fire extinguishers don't explode, such as in the movie Jaws. I stated that was a puncture, not intense heat applied and then...mentioned other common items that could explode when heat is applied.

I never stated that the "flashes" in the recent movie were conveniently falling hairspray. For that matter, I also didn't watch the video and jump right to "squibs" either.


Originally posted by Griff
As far as Zed and Seekerof....I can't believe you guys are pointing the finger at people for "Bush hating". How bout I point the finger at you for "All heil Bush".

Second. I also never stated I was a lover or a hater. The whole point was that so many people seem to jump to "they're guilty" ONLY on the basis of "you can tell" mentality. This is contrary to what this country is supposed to be about.

How does that make any of you different from the Bush Admin? Iraq was guilty of having WMDs based on "we can tell" and yet, in this case...it's ok. If you look at other motives...yeah, people hate Bush for what he does, how he speaks, what he says, how he ties his shoes, and hell...he even looks stupid.

All judgement type statements. Rather than pre-judge people, why not dig for something concrete and then attack? Isn't that what the Bush Admin should have done in Iraq? Isn't that the model that should still be upheld especially now?

I never stated that there was no corruption or mis-truths. This is the government after all. I only stated that evidence is needed before pronouncement of guilt.

Now, some of the comments (text bolded by me).

Originally posted by Echtelion
Filing lawsuits against an overly corrupt admninistration, with conclusive evidence, is (not "fun". THe families and individuals who are struggling for democracy in this country are spending thousands of dollars...


Originally posted by dgtempe
We recognize guilt when we see it. We recognize lies when we hear them.


Originally posted by masterp
Let's think about it ONE MORE TIME: THE PENTAGON WAS HIT! the nerve center of the mightiest war machine this planet has ever known was struck by 18-yold fanatics.

Can't you see how hilarious/impossible this is?

Just read those statements. Overly corrupt with conclusive evidence. Not proven. Conclusive evidence. Not proven. How impossible the attack was. Going into space was once impossible too. And my personal favorite..."We recognize guilt when we see it" which is grossly similar to Nazis who knew purity when they saw it, cops that know evil when they see it, and is similar to the mantra of almost every group trying to justify hate in some way.

Is that not wrong?

If I were to start banning people because "I know stupidity when I see it" then just how many complaints would come rolling in? In this case however, it's ok to use this mentality?

Anyway, the grand point is that we as a people are supposed to be better than just "knowing" people are guilty. I have no problem discussing, analyzing, digging, or exposing. I do have a problem when people claim corruption or law-breaking and then turn and act the same as those they accuse.




The only statement I made about the letter was asking, what did he do?
"WE KNOW WHAT YOU DID THAT SUMMER! We know it, and you know it, but we are not going to rest for a single moment until every one else knows too!"

So what did he do? They say they know it, but nobody can really answer. Why? Because they don't know. This letter is just the fishhook in the water. Nothing to exchange "atta boys" or anything.



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 11:41 AM
link   
Lazurus,

Yes, i was aware the the steel was sold to china and india, i was not reporting or trying to state false information.



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 11:47 AM
link   
To Griff,

I can't remember any time that there was not a rich white man in the white house. At least not in my lifetime.

I am trying to reach some common ground with you. I admit you and I have differences. I believe that all men have differences.

You are making a very broad generalization. Am I to interperet what you you said to mean that just because they are rich white men they have the same views?

We are way off what I originally asked you to respond to. Please, lets go back there.



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 11:54 AM
link   
To Zed,

Re: your last post. You hit the nail on the head, thank you. This is what I'm talking about. The "you are guilty because i know" mentality.

Thank you.

Maybe that's why i'm so upset with this site. Everybody knows Everything without any proof.



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 12:00 PM
link   
Zed,

Do you not think that evidence isn't that easy to come by? Even if there were evidence, people would still turn their backs, because they have programmed themselves to. Take the Gospels of Judas for starters, my catholic father immediately wrote it off as heracy without giving it any thought. The truth is not always self-evident to the people that don't want to see the truth. JFK assasination never relinquished any evidence, but do you think there was only one shooter? I know it sounds cliche', but people can feel when something is not right, and 9/11 was not right. Take operation "Northwoods" for instance. The military was going to blow up their own vessal just to justify a conflict with castro. Is that not deception? Would they have left evidence to support that? No, they would hide it and ignore the haters, just like they are doing now. We don't claim to have irrifutable evidence, though we do claim to know something is off. AAC



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 12:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
Zed,
Do you not think that evidence isn't that easy to come by?

That was not my point at all.

We don't claim to have irrifutable evidence, though we do claim to know something is off. AAC

This was my point. Doesn't the current Admin say the same thing to justify the NSA wiretapping?



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 12:11 PM
link   
I cannot believe that this thread is still going. This is nothing but a bunch of jealousy, and I finally see it coming to light. You are ll jealous of Bush, and all the accomplishment he has made as a coke headed-falied business man and now he is the president of the united states. It is not your concern if what his past is, but what he is doing now.

Unemployment is way down, back to pre 9/11 levels and Commerce is on the rise. There have been NO terror attacks in 5 years. Now, coimmon sense tells you that they would have 'staged ' another one, however the administration comes out and explains what they have prevented, and still thre is no recognition, just more "we hate him and he is a liar". Folks, that went out in elementary school.

Bush is not in control of oil prices, oil companies are. Boycott and buy a hybrid.

9/11 was purpotrated by men who hate us, and their hate has spread into our country the way they wanted it too. In hte weeks following 9/11, everyone was patriotic, and wanted payback. If ANY of you on here, right now, state that on 9/11/01, you thought something fishy was going on, you are lying. Everyone, including our own government were caught off guard, and they admitted this in the 9/11 commission hearings.

The people have become complacent enough in America for another attack, because again, we are not expecting it as a country and continue to blame our government for everything.



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 12:11 PM
link   
Tommy.

Maybe you'd be better off looking at the NIST site instead of here if you have such a problem here. You see, we are not here to prove anything conclusively but to speculate on theories and have debates on those theories. This is a forum after all and not a 9/11 commission board.

But, you'll probably not like the NIST site also because they don't give proof of their claims either.



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 12:16 PM
link   
Zed, no harm no foul. I see no end to this debate. I understand your statement about double-standards. I think it comes down to what people truly believe. We will always have two sides to this story. I just feel that the other side hasn't sifted through all the holes in the story. If they have and still reach this conclusion, these we have to end it with a gentlemens disagreement. I hope that one day the truth is out, untll then, I will not open this pandora's box again. It falls under the catagory with; religion and politics, never to be discussed with a stranger.
AAC



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 12:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
It falls under the catagory with; religion and politics, never to be discussed with a stranger.
AAC


Or at a bar. I have 3 friends that won't let me even say the words nine eleven or world trade center in their presence. And one's a former NSA employee. Go figure.



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 12:30 PM
link   
To Griff,

I'm dissappointed with you. I thought you and I were having a reasonable discussion.


Please go back to my post #2115057 and respond.

I would like your take on what I have stated.

Thank you.



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 01:06 PM
link   
Griff,

I found this for you about the debis of WTC.

www.wasteage.com...



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 01:11 PM
link   
Lazurus -

If you can't find any links that work i would suggest these sites.

www.cianca.com...

www.popularmechanics.com...



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 01:13 PM
link   
I don't dispute that the waste was taken there. What I disputed was you said ALL the debris was taken there. I think you and I misunderstood what was being said. The steel was sold to China and melted down. As far as the other waste, were the different agencies allowed access to this site to go over the debris? Ligitimate question. I also thought we were having a good conversation. I'll look at your post after I write this and comment.



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 01:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by tommy1701
To Griff


See what I mean Griff. You went off topic. You believe that at the upper levels of government repubs and dems are not that far apart.

May I ask, do you watch CNN, Fox? Do you listen to Talk radio?


I actually try not to. IMO they are all pawns to the shadow government that really runs things.


I am not gonna go back and forth with you tit for tat. The upper levels of government are so closely watched by the news media and then us. Bush/Kerry can't go to the bathroom without us knowing about it.

Here in New York, Chuck Schumer calls a press conference 2 or 3 times a week. Our Mayor, bloomberg is on the radio every friday morning and takes calls from citizens, and yes, i was very fortunate to speak with him. My question was about the local roads where i lived, (not to go off topic.)


Let me explain what I THINK. Yes, they are closely watched, but the people behind the scenes are not. I know...crazy conspiracy theorist.



To respond to you they are both "rich kids", come on.

The only way for me to interperet this and the rest of what you say is that, "they're in on it"


Not in on it per say. I was refering to your statement that the reps and dems are sooo far apart in their thoughts. I don't think that would be so with Kerry and Bush. Can you really tell me that having the mostly same upbringing is going to give them vastly differing views of the world?


Let me go a step further, Are you also saying that, Wolf Blitzer Al Frankin, Howard Dean, Diane Feinstein, Robert Byrd really don't mean all the derogatory things they say about republicans?

And that the same is true for Repubs who say things about dems?

And Rush limbaugh expends all this time and energy to "put on a show" for us common folks?

Come on. You really can't believe that.


I don't. I believe those people are really expressing their views. But, they are not part of the elite that really run this country (world).


You also stated we need a common man to become prominant in the government. May I ask Who?

Let me put out the name of John Mclain. (im not sure of spelling his name).

I think we can agree that he is a common man. He was the Media's boy up until about 2 months ago. The media stood behind everything this guy said and called him a rouge republican - until he agreed with the bush admistration. Then, he became the media's target.

Are you gonna sit there and tell me that this is somehow orchestrated?


Could be, could not be. I don't have all the answers. I'm just basically thinking out loud.



[edit on 12-4-2006 by Griff]



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 01:24 PM
link   
Griff,

Thank you for responding. Maybe we did misunderstand each other. Let's get over it.

If you will go the the first web site I listed you will find an excellent article about the waste from 9/11.

As for me, I have to go to work. I will be back on tomorrow. I look forward to discussing this subject with you.

One last thought, maybe you and I got off on the wrong foot. If so, let me apologize again.

Thank you.



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 01:26 PM
link   
I didn't really think we were on the wrong foot. I have enjoyed talking (debating) with you. Take care...and I really did mean it when I said I feel for your loss on that dreadful day.



posted on Apr, 12 2006 @ 02:35 PM
link   
Read these last two posts folks.

There is a lesson there for ALL of us.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join