It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by marko1970
But if you hear the truth & reject it, that's YOUR own decision.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Well that's a rather simplistic way of looking at things. Do you really think that 80% of the rational world are just upset that they have to follow rules, and that's why their not Christian? Please Marko.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
So, have you been in Hell? Heaven? Dead?
Some people will believe anything they read in an old book. Or that someone tells them. I suppose it's easier than trying to find any truth within yourself. Oh excuse me, that's the Devil talking.
Originally posted by WiseSheep
Originally posted by marko1970
But if you hear the truth & reject it, that's YOUR own decision.
I can look back on things that I've majorly screwed up in this life, and the effects of the "screwup" were quite painful to go through, but one gets over it.
I couldn't imagine being eternally burned, and while burning, rehearsing in my mind every single time I was told the truth of Jesus Christ and had the chance to escape, but didn't and rejected him. FOREVER.
That thought alone even knowing that I'm saved from that near about makes me sick.
I wish everybody could open their eyes, but clearly it isn't meant to be.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
So what's the difference between putting my full faith in a Web Page I found on Google, and putting my full faith in the Bible?
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
If you're going by age and accuracy in translation, head to Hinduism. The Vedas are a few thousand years older than the Bible, and most are still around in their original script (however Sanskrit is a tough language to learn, trust me).
[edit on 21-7-2006 by Rasobasi420]
Originally posted by marko1970
I know water is wet, & fire is hot.
The truth is still the truth; & any religion that worships a God, with the belief that someday, THEY TOO, can become a god, has no true value....
I mean after all, if WE can (or WILL) become gods ourselves, what's the point in worshiping another god? Right?
Why not just worship ourselves, & give ourselves all the glory???
Why waste time giving praise & thanks to anyone but ourselves, if someday WE get to be gods???
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Originally posted by marko1970
I know water is wet, & fire is hot.
The truth is still the truth; & any religion that worships a God, with the belief that someday, THEY TOO, can become a god, has no true value....
I
Now, If God were to reveal himself to the world through a savior, wouldn't it make sense that he send a savior to many different parts of the world?
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Originally posted by marko1970
I know water is wet, & fire is hot.
The truth is still the truth; & any religion that worships a God, with the belief that someday, THEY TOO, can become a god, has no true value....
All based on heresay I'm sure.
I mean after all, if WE can (or WILL) become gods ourselves, what's the point in worshiping another god? Right?
Why not just worship ourselves, & give ourselves all the glory???
Why waste time giving praise & thanks to anyone but ourselves, if someday WE get to be gods???
I'll bet you haven't read anything into this. One doesn't become a God. One becomes one with God. And God isn't a simple father figure who knows all the answers. God is much more than that. God is the unity of mankind. God exists as all.
So one doesn't become another God, one becomes God, or rather becomes one with God. Isn't that what christianity teaches as well?
Revelation 1:8: I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty
Since God is all things, isn't he us as well? And therefore aren't we him?
Very similar to Krishna stating "I am the Self, O Gudakesa, seated in the hearts of all creatures. I am the beginning, the middle, and the end of all beings"
Now, If God were to reveal himself to the world through a savior, wouldn't it make sense that he send a savior to many different parts of the world? It may make sense that he sent another savior with the near exact same teachings to another part of the word. The only difference being who took those teachings, and what they did with them. Obviously Christianity did some horrible things with them over the ages.
www.religioustolerance.org...
read this article. It describes the similarities and differences between Christianity and Huinduism. It's very interesting.
Originally posted by marko1970
I believe God is more than just a father figure for sure. He IS more than all. He created all. He's
However, God is not "us" & we are NOT HIM.
He made us in his likeness, & he is "in" us if we accept him. He becomes part of us when we allow him into our lives. But to say "WE are also God" would mean there would be more than one God, which isn't the case.
Genesis 5: 1 This is the list of the descendants of Adam. When God created humankind, he made them in the likeness of God. 2 Male and female he created them, and he blessed them and named them "Humankind" when they were created.
3 When Adam had lived one hundred thirty years, he became the father of a son in his likeness, according to his image, and named him Seth.
I don't agree with the idea he would send another savior in addition to Jesus......
...Reason being, God said there would be ONE messiah that will come to bring salvation to his people. If there were MORE than one, it wouldn't have been as miraculous.
(Know what I mean?)
I DO know one thing,.. He's NOT some statue carved out of stone, or wood, or gold. He's not a planet, or a star, or an animal living in India..... he is much bigger, & greater than everything.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Originally posted by marko1970
I believe God is more than just a father figure for sure. He IS more than all. He created all. He's
However, God is not "us" & we are NOT HIM.
He made us in his likeness, & he is "in" us if we accept him. He becomes part of us when we allow him into our lives. But to say "WE are also God" would mean there would be more than one God, which isn't the case.
Actually, That is a very telling passage of the Bible.
Genesis 5: 1 This is the list of the descendants of Adam. When God created humankind, he made them in the likeness of God. 2 Male and female he created them, and he blessed them and named them "Humankind" when they were created.
3 When Adam had lived one hundred thirty years, he became the father of a son in his likeness, according to his image, and named him Seth.
Notice that God created Adam in his likeness. While Seth was born in the likeness of Adam, therefore in the likeness of God, but in the image of Adam. In this passage there is no mention that Adam was made in Gods image.
To be in the likeness of God then, for me, takes the meaning of mans soul, being like God's. If there is One God, then the only way to explain this is that the multiple likenesses of God must become one with the one God.
It doesn't mean multiple gods.
I don't agree with the idea he would send another savior in addition to Jesus......
...Reason being, God said there would be ONE messiah that will come to bring salvation to his people. If there were MORE than one, it wouldn't have been as miraculous.
(Know what I mean?)
If Jesus is the messiah, who's to say he isn't the same being that brought truth to India? Maybe Krishna and Christ have more in common than a similar name. Maybe they both were the one messiah God spoke of. After all, why couldn't he be the same person?
I DO know one thing,.. He's NOT some statue carved out of stone, or wood, or gold. He's not a planet, or a star, or an animal living in India..... he is much bigger, & greater than everything.
He is also not an old white man with a beard. He is also not a 'he'. The Ghita says that God is everything. So does the Bible. So yes, god is a statue of stone, of wood, of gold. He is every planet, and star. He is every animal living everywhere. To deny this would be to deny your own faith.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Show me how Jesus's teachings and Krishna's arre different. And BTW, these aren't necessarily my beliefs, just a perfectly valid and workin alternative to yours.