It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shadowhawk
Unfortunately, the MDS designators are not always assigned with the type of logic one would expect. Quite a few experimental aircraft that deserved to be X-planes never recieved X designations. Examples include the D-558-1 and D-558-2 transonic and supersonic research aircraft and the M-2F1, M2-F2/M2-F3, and HL-10 lifting bodies.
Originally posted by Shadowhawk
Airframe studies were conducted by Lockheed, Boeing, Rockwell, and General Dynamics.
Originally posted by Figher Master FIN
How do you explain the Y/F-17 Waynos...?? It was after all the beginning of the F/A-18...
originally posted by: waynos
"Nice planes, they are going to be the YF-24 and YF-25 yes?"
" But wait! there is already a YF-24 in existence so they will have to be the YF-25 and YF-26 yes?"
"No, wait! The YF-24 is top secret and we don't want any clue that it exists, a missing number is rather obvious, what shall we do?"
"We can stick them in the X plane sequence and pretend that they aren't really prototypes at all?"
"OK, that works for me, X-32 and X-35 are free, whatsmore, we can keep the number for whichever one wins and just change the X for an F, that will be so far out of sequence the YF-24 can stay secret and everybody will accept that F-32 or F-35 makes sense because they will be used to the X plane designation by then"
"Excellent work Hank, now go get me a coffee".