It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Iran's Military Power + Country Photo Blog

page: 1

log in


posted on Apr, 8 2006 @ 09:47 PM

It is being updated (tank factory, shabab-3 missiles - production, etc).

Look on the right for more categories - pictures.

[edit on 8-4-2006 by Aimster]

posted on Apr, 8 2006 @ 11:57 PM
HOW MANY THREADS ARE THERE LIKE THIS?????? YES WE UNDERSTAND THAT IRAN HAS A GOOD MILITARY AND THEY HAVE SOME GOOD EQUIPMENT. And we all know that Iran is going to have a good pile of rubble when they mess with the US. Sure the US will take some hits but well LEVEL Iran.


posted on Apr, 9 2006 @ 12:15 AM
Mate, as you can see every country is currently making its own official thread regarding the country's military's pictures and its developments. I guess this one is the official Iranian one, and if you are not interested, no one is forcing you to reply to the thread. Hopefully the weapons of war on display on this thread and the ones in the American, British and the Canada/Australia/New Zealand thread will not be put to use against each other, and I find it deeply disturbing that you boast about "levelling" Iran. That is in my opinion truly sad and a sign of immaturity and insecurity on your part.

posted on Apr, 9 2006 @ 12:17 AM
Yeah, im not trying to be a jerk here, but seriously there are like a crap load of threads about Iran. Like a lot, a lot.


posted on Apr, 9 2006 @ 12:18 AM
There are ten times as many threads on American equipment and doctrine, perhaps you would want to stop them before attacking Iranian threads.

posted on Apr, 9 2006 @ 12:31 AM
Yeah, but first of all the exact same thing happens on all american threads. Second, the Iranian threads are all basically the same thing.

posted on Apr, 9 2006 @ 12:36 AM
Irans Military certainly is looking much more modern and more formidible than ever. What worries me is that they may make use of Comercial ships and planes weapons also. Hope fully not but seeing a commercial build on the links military page makes me suggest so. Is that an official Iranian site?


posted on Apr, 9 2006 @ 12:48 AM

Originally posted by truttseeker
Yeah, but first of all the exact same thing happens on all american threads.

Iranians jump in and threaten to level America to the ground? Can you point me to the threads where this is happening, because of the threads on this page I don't see any.

Originally posted by truttseekerSecond, the Iranian threads are all basically the same thing.

All the "same thing"? There are discussions about flying boats, cruise missiles, two different types of torpedos and a new ballistic missile (all revealed this week so you may see why so many "Iran" threads are appearing). These topics may appear to be the same because they have the name "Iran" attached to them, but I can assure you that the moderators will lock any thread if they see that one subject is being discussed in two threads.

posted on Apr, 9 2006 @ 01:20 AM
I am simplying making a photo blog.

It is going to be updated daily with pictures of Iran

and I am even going to add Israel

It is not intended to say hey look at Iran is the best

I am an officer in the U.S Air Force and I know for a fact the U.S > All.

I am simply making a blog of all the information I have put together on one website for all to see.

I have not seen one Iranian site like the blog I am creating so I created it. All I have seen are a bunch of crap scattered all around various sites.

posted on Apr, 9 2006 @ 01:53 AM
OK... OK OK OK OK OK OK WTF this stupid contest of wills has went on long enough.

I come here to read real news and read about real advancements.


If I wanted this sort of international and willfully stupid posturing I'd read not ATS threads.

[Mod edit – Please, lets try and not attack each other]

My only request would be that if you insist on toutting second rate equipment as some sort of breakthrough... do it somewhere else (I think weekly world news needs field reporters after all). And if you insist on gleefully assuming america will win a war against all takers please put in your applications behind the second or third rate indigenous force people.

But otherwise please just [Mod edit - Expletive acronym deleted] leave the meaningful and actually enlightening threads/webforums alone.

You accomplish nothing and you never will with your blindly nationallistic ways, further you actually support the agenda of ignorance and hate ATS set about to shed light on.

[edit on 10/4/2006 by Umbrax]

posted on Apr, 9 2006 @ 02:14 AM
what in the world are you talking about?

posted on Apr, 9 2006 @ 02:18 AM
I dont know Aimster some of us sometimes post without reading everything. Myself included. More pic's of their land assets would be appreciated.

posted on Apr, 9 2006 @ 02:56 AM
I will continue to keep updating it.

I just added like 5-6 topics today (took me a few hours)

Now it is time for sleep.

Will do more tomorrow and probably every day.

Take Care

posted on Apr, 9 2006 @ 10:56 PM
Whats Iran?

posted on Apr, 10 2006 @ 12:44 AM
Not Iran. The question is what's a rahn (rähn)?

The word rahn comes form the days of the British Empire, where real men wore big red coats and stood face-to-face with thousands of foriegners and, without the feintest glimmer of sanity, tried to steal their country. When things would get particularly heated then would come the dreaded order, 'Soldier, get me a rahn.'

The rahn, or in it's original spelling rah'rn was a short length iron rod with the British used to place just under their nose. Then, normally with some army standard horseglue (but really anything handy could be used and tree sap was a widely used substitute), they would glue this rod in place. The idea was that this pulled their top lip up and bared their teeth in a manner which (due to extremly bad Army dentistry in the 1800's) would scare the native inhabitants so much that they would simply relinquish their lands without any further a struggle.

Unfortunately this proved to be singularly ineffective, rather than scare anyone it just made those in command authorised to carry out these tactics look very silly and dribble a lot because of there 'Stiff upper lip'. After which many of the local inhabitants would proceed make (Brit)ish-kebabs out of the visiting English Gentlemen.

It did though lead to the phrase remembered today, 'Stiff upper lip' which the British understand actually means 'Stop moaning, you think things were bad before, now all seven of us have to try steal an entire continent inhabited by many, many, many while wearing these very lightweight and inconspicious red jackets those clever government bods have so kindly provided us with' or 'Come on mate, it could be worse'.

Next week I shall be explaining the meaning of a rähk.

[edit on 10/4/06 by Mark Harris]

new topics

top topics


log in