Originally posted by briantaylor
ATS has potential and I can appreciate the cautious nature of the ATS panel, we are riding a dangerous wave. But if we are reduced to the very things
the panel complains about, what's the point?
It's important to be fully aware of our stance in this regard -- that of an extreme cautiousness regarding the privacy of our members.
There was at least three confirmed incidents in the past that have led to our very-stern restriction on the recruitment of ATS members.
One incident involved a DIA (US Defense Intelligence Agency) scam that initially seemed innocuous, but resulted in the harvesting of emails and phone
numbers of ATS members. (The "Juniper Six" event, discussed at length in our RATS forum)
One event also seemed to involve an earnest conspiracy investigation that was, in reality, an effort to infect many ATS members with keystroke logging
trojans.
The other event was a "conspiracy discussion board" that attracted several members, used their emails to change their ATS passwords, and caused
several days of mayhem posting horrible content posing as those members.
These were long in our past, but serve as a reminder that the provocative nature of our topics attract a broad mix of interested parties -- ranging
form serious investigators of conspiracies, to serious investigators of conspiracy theorists, and include those who would harm you and your
computers.
I'm not saying you were doing this... but consider how easy it would be to pose as a patriot with a cause, gather dozens of ATS members, and
ultimately gain a wealth of personal data.
This is the primary reason we're careful about who can link to personal sites, especially social networking sites or discussion boards.
With that in mind, we have allowed a few organized events in the past. In those cases, the people contacted us first, we vetted their integrity, and
watched closely.
The privacy of our members is our utmost concern.
[edit on 19-10-2009 by SkepticOverlord]