Excellent post! If I may, Id like to challenge a couple of ideas you have.
Originally posted by Dock6Another means of putting men out of balance and unsure of their role and capabilities, is to kick their
confidence around on daily basis.
Im wondering at which era in our civilisation are you reffering to where men knew their roles and responsibilities? Because as far as I know the
industrial revolution brought about certian changes. All family members were working in mines and factories, it was the introduction of Women and
Children Facorty Acts (yes, this is feminism) that took women and children from these work places and into the home and schooling system.
We've been advised (by Makow amongst others) that the Women's Lib movement was a pivotal phase in the Zionist destruction of western
Here again, I believe youre a little too focused on the "evils of feminism". I think its more on the line that Womens Liberation was a pivital
phase in the Zionists creation
of western societies.
Women AND men were the dupes. Men were told they had to change, had to accept a less dominant role at home, work, socially, etc. So men grew
used to repressing their inherent maleness for fear of giving unintended offence, or of inviting criticism, of being considered 'unacceptable'
generally. This created confusion in men; lack of confidence and feelings of shame about who and what they were.
You agree that both men and women were/are duped but you go on like its men who have had it bad. Women were told they had to change, had to accept a
less subserviant role at home, work, socially, etc. In effect, both parties are suffering due to expectations placed upon them. Lets have some
equality here, your average women on the street had nothing to do with feminism and its uses. This confusion you talk about isnt just aimed at men,
it is aimed at women with just as equal vigor, lest not forget that the NWO treats us all equally!
Another tool in the Zionist agenda was to destroy the family unit.
Again this word, destroy? Change and shape pehaps! Again, in what era are you reffering to when the ideal family unit was about? Was that era free
from NWO/Zionist/whatever control?
Men traditionally were heads of families; were the breadwinners. They gained their sense of identity from this. By promoting Women's Lib and
encouraging women to leave the home for work, men no longer felt like the head of anything.
Somehow I dont think this is a brilliant way to have a family, been there done that, can we try something else now? We arnt in serfdom anymore, we
are now slaves to the banks, lets break free from this whole economic suicide, capitalism is plain AWFUL!
Maybe we dont need "breadwinners" or "housewives" maybe we can all contribute to our survival without capitalising on our weaknesses and desire to
live, and the family can have a dad who isnt always at work and too tired, or a mum who isnt bored to tears with the humdrum of cooking/cleaning.
Think beyond THEIR box I say!
Yet every ship needs a captain, and there can only be ONE captain. A family is a ship; one leak and it's disaster.
Ayeyup! Well yeah ships need captians but the family is not like a ship at all! Anyway, correct me if Im wrong but a leaky ship isnt a disaster, its
something that sea vessels have to deal with as part of sea life. Though I imagine a leaky submarine would be scary!