REVOLUTION ? ? ?
Absolutely.
***
Revolution \Rev`o*lu"tion\, n. [F. r['e]volution, L. revolutio. See Revolve.]
1. The act of revolving, or turning round on an axis or a center; the motion of a body round a fixed point or line; rotation; as, the revolution of a
wheel, of a top, of the earth on its axis, etc.
2. Return to a point before occupied, or to a point relatively the same; a rolling back; return; as, revolution in an ellipse or spiral.
That fear Comes thundering back, with dreadful revolution, On my defenseless head. --Milton.
3. The space measured by the regular return of a revolving body; the period made by the regular recurrence of a measure of time, or by a succession of
similar events. ``The short revolution of a day.'' --Dryden.***
Nothing that the word 'revolution' has ever applied to so far truly understood the definition of the word itself.
It doesn't mean 'fight' , it doesn't involve a 'struggle', it' doesn't consider 'failure'. And that's all everybody who has considered
their perception of a 'revolution' involving because that is what every other 'revolutionary' has encountered.
No ONE has been able to address the SOURCE of the problem.
How bad would 'men' in general fight against the women and children to maintain possession of the power drugs and the mountain of WMD they have
established so far... to guarantee WHO"S future ?
Everything we understand in our life was made available to us by MAN.
And look how far war are into WWW
3 already. If that's what WE wanted and it was obviously the BEST chance to provide a future for Children,
would there be a potential fight struggle or failure considered in the execution of this "plea-bargan"??