Excellent post ! I think many people are asking themselves the same questions as those you've posed.
You're right: sixty years ago this situation could never have evolved. A hundred a sixty years ago, no politician or group of politicians would
have dared attempt the repressive control of populations as is now occurring.
But maybe I'm wrong. Pearl Harbour for example --- the radar technicians were stood down, apparently, in order the Japanese could launch their
fatal attacks. Did those radar technicians come forward? Not even ONE of them? I don't think we can accept that not one of them, or even six of
them, did not examine their conscience and decide they must reveal what they knew.
So how come we only learned about the betrayal that was Pearl Harbour, a few years ago? How come for all those decades, we believed that the Japanese
had somehow achieved the impossible by bombing Pearl Harbour? How come we didn't ask ourselves: ' Hey ! How the hell did those Japs get so CLOSE
to Pearl without being detected???? What the hell were the radar guys doing .... sleeping? '
But we didn't ask, did we? And no one told us. Instead, we watched all the movies and tv shows and books .... and we bought their story: we
suspended our critical faculties and simply accepted what we were told and shown.
How come the media of the day didn't ask: ' Hey! How the hell did it happen? What were the radar guys doing?'. And it's interesting, when you
think of it, that not ONE of those radar guys' stories made it into the mainstream media of the day? How come the betrayal of Pearl Harbour was not
exposed, way back then?
So, the media has been manipulating us a long time, without our even realising it, back then.
Another factor is the 'one in twenty' theory. Apparently, administrators of jails and POW camps, etc., *find* the one in twenty, and isolate them.
The one in twenty is the one who initiates action; who motivates the remaining 19; who acts as natural leader. The one in twenty is smarter, more
capable, more independently minded than the other 19. The other 19 can be restrained with minimum effort; they are sheep-like, relatively obdedient;
are 'followers'. Get rid of the one in twenty, and your job of controlling the other 19 is easy. Perhaps repressive regimes are actively seeking
the 'ones in twenty' within our midst. They might find them at protest rallies; in internet forums; etc. They are the first to be picked off.
Perhaps they've *already* been picked off, which might account for all us sheepies, just sitting here in confusion and dismay, waiting for our
'leaders' to come and show us what to do to save ourselves ?
Then there's testosterone. It's what makes men fiesty; willing to take on aggressors and repressors. Knock out the testosterone and men become
malleable: peaceable; hesitant; unsure; docile. It's been shown that men can be (and are being?) turned into a form of psuedo-female, via chemicals
contained in foods, drinks, food and drink wrappings and containers, etc.
Another means of putting men out of balance and unsure of their role and capabilities, is to kick their confidence around on daily basis. We've been
advised (by Makow amongst others) that the Women's Lib movement was a pivotal phase in the Zionist destruction of western societies. Women AND men
were the dupes. Men were told they had to change, had to accept a less dominant role at home, work, socially, etc. So men grew used to repressing
their inherent maleness for fear of giving unintended offence, or of inviting criticism, of being considered 'unacceptable' generally. This created
confusion in men; lack of confidence and feelings of shame about who and what they were.
Another tool in the Zionist agenda was to destroy the family unit. Men traditionally were heads of families; were the breadwinners. They gained their
sense of identity from this. By promoting Women's Lib and encouraging women to leave the home for work, men no longer felt like the head of
anything. Yet every ship needs a captain, and there can only be ONE captain. A family is a ship; one leak and it's disaster.
The family unit was further undermined through drugs, pornography, easily-obtained divorce, credit, consumerism and government dictates that forced
parents to surrender their children to dumbed-down education systems that encouraged children to challenge their parents at the same time it forbade
parents to discipline their children effectively. Governments imposed their versions of 'sex education' upon children and insist that children
recognise same-gender sexuality and marriage, etc. Parents have had to sit back and watch their children being exposed to inordinate emphasis on
sexuality: at school, in the media, etc. Parents are 'punished' if they object to what they clearly feel is an unhealthy agenda aimed at their
children, by the government for which they pay.
People have been told they 'must not' object to government dictates; 'must not' voice their opinions about issues of race, immigration, education,
government decisions, corruption, and a dozen other issues.
People are afraid to open their mouths. They feel their opinions are 'wrong' or punishable. The media reports the punitive actions of governments
against those in society who speak out. The media is engaged in a campaign of terror, on behalf of governments. People see black-outfitted
monsters, seemingly seven feet tall, their faces hidden behind black visors, their shoulders padded to immense proportions, wearing six inch soles,
weilding a variety of terrifying weapons against old age pensions staging a peaceful protest. People are terrified. What if *they* were beaten by
these government sanctioned goons, simply for being in the wrong place at the wrong time? What would happen to their family if they were incarcerated
without charge or evidence?
So, for quite some time now, people have been manipulated by governments who push and pull, push and pull. The message people are being given is
brutality simple: keep your mouths shut and do as your told and you might survive what we have in store for you. What we may or may not have in store
for you is a secret. However, if you DO dare to open your mouth and voice any objection to this govenment, we can promise you that you will suffer a
fate worse than death. Now go to work, shut your mouths, see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing , think nothing, pay your taxes, obey us, believe
everything we tell you even though we will vary our tune daily .... and you and your family might make it through until next week. You have no
opinon, no rights and probably no future. So shut up and enjoy what little you have today.
No, governments and corporations couldn't have gotten away with this sixty years ago. But sixty years ago, people had just fought the fight of their
lives, WW2. They'd survived the ravages of the Great Depression. Then along came the golden years; the 50's and 60's and formica and
refrigerators and air-conditioning and new cars and homes and light, romantic Doris Day/Rock Hudson comedies and extended leisure time. Golf and
tennis and music lessons were no longer just the province of the wealthy. People grew used to a new, more leisurely, more materialistically enriched
lifestyle. They grew used to peace, to governments who handled the big-issues, which resulted in 'more' of the good stuff for much of the
population. Gone for most, were the days of not enough food and money. Everything seemed wonderful and getting better by the day. People forgot
'hardship' as their parents had known it. And movies and the new wonders of tv introduced people to 'escapism'; encouraged them to dream often
unrealistic ambitions for themselves and their children.
In other words, people lost much of their 'edge'. They grew complacent to a degree. They wanted the fun stuff of life and left government deal
with the boring issues. People surrendered their independence in return for what seemed like the good life. And then they took the good life for
Problem is, when you hand responsibility for yourself to someone else, or to a group of others, you need to realise that those others are going to do
what's in *their* interests, not yours.
Governments/politicians are NOT the way they're portrayed in all those movies and tv shows. Sure, they have the nice suits and the grey-flecked hair
and good teeth. Their voices are often rich and deep and comforting, but so are a lot of radio announcers' voices ... and a lot of those are
maniacs. It's not HOW they speak, but what they say that matters. But most important of all is what they neglect to say, which is actually what
they secretly MEAN.
TV and movies have manipulated us to accept that if a politician LOOKS nice, then he/she is 'good'. We've come to believe that if a politician
went to a 'good' school; if he is handsome, if he lives in an exclusive neighbourhood, if he socialises with celebrities ... then he is someone we
should allow to control our lives. Well, Madonna is a celebrity and Tom Cruise has nice teeth and hair ... but would you let them determine your
children's fate? Would you allow them to poison your water and food and strip you of employment and your previously nice neighbourhood? Arnold
Swartzenegger was dynamic in Terminator and funny as hell in Twins and Kindergarten Cop ...... but does that really qualify him to control the lives
of millions? Does it?
At the moment, we're waiting like frightened sheep, hoping the days of Fonzie and Brady Bunch mentality will return. We don't like these wars and
unemployment and fear. We want it all to stop. We want to be able to go back to enjoying that sense of childhood we knew even ten years ago. We
want someone to step up and fix things so that we can feel better. And according to various so-called 'conspiracy theories', we're exactly where
'they' want us to be, right on schedule. According to the same theories, 'they' will soon introduce the anti-Christ ... who will look exactly the
way we've been conditioned to expect our 'leaders' to look: tall, tanned, silver tipped hair, nice suit and teeth and a voice like honey, which
will reassure us that all we have to do is follow him and we'll all be able to sit back and relax and enjoy again ........ forever, in hell.
It all comes down, as Bob Dylan said a long time ago, to doing it yourself: ' If you want someone to trust ... trust yourself ' --- ' If you want
someone to love -- love yourself' -- ' If you want someone to believe -- believe yourself'.
There will always be one in twenty. But they're having a rough time right now, like the female lawyer they're trying to lock up for 106 years for
doing nothing more than exposing corruption in her locality. SHE is one of the ones in twenty. You have a choice: support and defend those Ones in
Twenty now, so that they can fix your world up for you. Or sit back on your couch and watch re-runs of Everyone Loves Raymond and let them take those
Ones in Twenty away, leaving you and yours helpless and doomed. But people are going to have to make a decision and live with it, because this crap
isn't going to go away or get better without a hell of a lot of work and risk.
One of the best bits of advice available at this time, is to do as the ancient Scots did, when they were poised at the edge of a life and death
battle. They recited their genealogy, then called to God, saying: 'God --- give me the courage of my ancestors ! ' Doing the same might just be
what puts us on the right path and gives us the courage to continue.