It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by fennek77
Tell me.. What do you want? What else?
Originally posted by the_sentinal
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
there was no evidence in the link, just a bunch of arguments pointing out TINY TINY flaws in evolutionary theory
you couldnt answer some of the points so how can you say that there is no evidence??
Originally posted by shaunybaby
Originally posted by fennek77
Tell me.. What do you want? What else?
how about a little less religious propoganda? i mean a site www.creationevidence.org doesn't really scream 'equality'. it's all religion religion religion, of course they'll just be showing you evidence 'for' creation or trying to debunk evolution in anyway possible. merely stating that the brain is complex does not debunk evolution, and in no way adds to the creationism arguement.
i'd like some evidence to suggest that god put his hands in the dirt, pulled them out and created adam. but creationists can and never will prove that. you're trying to prove the unprovable. if you believe in creationism it's not because you believe it over evolution, it's because you're merely taking it on faith, and in essence what you to believe is 'god's word'.
Originally posted by Enkidu
Okay, so if I agreed with all of the stuff on Page 1, that all of these things are wrong or misinterpreted, what is the logical line of thought that leads to the conclusion that it was all "created" (whatever that means) by God?
I just can't connect the dots. Is there an implication that there are NO OTHER POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES to the God explanation? We've explored every possible reason why these thing's explanations are wrong, and the only reasonable conclusion we can reach is that God did it?
I think somebody might possibly be overlooking some alternative explanations.
Can I make that objection any more passive? Thanks.
[edit on 2-5-2006 by Enkidu]
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Nygdan,
Very skilled debate. I need you here to convince my sales staff that you can’t sell anything if you spend the whole day reading the newspaper.
Sentinel,
“Cast not your pearls among swine”. If you believe, you believe. You can not force someone to change to your point of view just because you want them to. Be comforted in the fact that a vast majority of the Earth’s population believes in a creator and that your opponents are infuriated that they can not force their views on us.
Regarding the topic of your post: You chose to cast in your lot with a person who appears to be a total fraud. No credible person would use such utter nonsense to try and prove that that can not be proven. The truth is that mankind has not even scratched the surface of how the Universe functions. Science is struggling just to define the genetic code. Almost nothing is known of how the human brain functions. There are vast areas of the oceans yet to be explored. New species are being found daily. Yet there are those foolish enough to believe that science is in an advanced state. It is in its infancy. Infinity is a very large place. Science is limited to explaining only what it can quantify or qualify. Faith is not one of those things.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Almost nothing is known of how the human brain functions.... Yet there are those foolish enough to believe that science is in an advanced state.
Originally posted by the_sentinal
if you wont look at evidence because it has god attached to it then arent you going into this with blinders on???
www.answersingenesis.org...
because faith is above science, faith is a spiritual force and the spiritual world is in another dimension
Originally posted by the_sentinal
it's not that god did it is the only explanation....just the most logical one!
Originally posted by the_sentinal
ok! what about this one will you look at this one...it has a good section on carbon dating...if you wont look at evidence because it has god attached to it then arent you going into this with blinders on???
www.answersingenesis.org...
Originally posted by melatonin
OK sentinal, simple question - how old is the earth?
it's not that god did it is the only explanation....just the most logical one! most people dont want to accept this explanation because then they would have to accept other thing's along with it that they dont want to accept ...like sin and things like that so it's just easier to deny the whole thing and move along to the other explanations
Originally posted by Enkidu
The Earth is either around 8,000 years old, according to the Bible, or it's several million years old, according to the human footprints found with the dinosaur tracks.
It is necessary to bear in mind that quite apart from all the problems of calibration, a significant proportion of radiocarbon dates are not reliable for any purposes, because they have been contaminated with older or younger carbon that changes the apparent age of the sample. Many radiocarbon-dating specialists still refer to their field as 'more an art than as science'! Published radiocarbon dates from sites and layers of fossils and sediments are quite often rescinded, when the materials are found to have been naturally contaminated. Most often the contamination is from older (less 14C-rich) calcium carbonate, coal or charcoal washed in from other layers, making a sample or layer seem older than it actually is. Although radiocarbon dating is a very useful tool for the Quaternary palaeoecologist, it must always be interpreted with caution.
counting back the annual layers will reveal the true number of years before the present, and comparing the 14C age of each tree ring or sediment layer will give an age scale for how 14C age can be converted into 'real' age. However, even this method is not completely reliable; 'false' double rings can sometimes appear, and occasionally a year may not appear in the record. Because of these problems, individual ring or layer-counting studies often suggest 'real' ages differing from one another by several percent,
Combined with highly advanced measuring techniques (Fuhrer et al. 1993; Hammer et al. 1985;Rothlisberger et al. 2000) the resolution of the Greenland ice-core records can frequently be finer than a year, and potentially this degree of temporal resolution extends back to before 100 thousand years before present. The records are capable therefore of providing information on long-term (millennial, supra-millennial) and short-term (sub-millennial to annual or seasonal) cycles or trends in the Earth's past environmental history, as well as on important singular events, such as major volcanic eruptions or particularly pronounced climatic shifts. Furthermore, the age and durations of past environmental events can be estimated by counting of the annual ice increments, by analysing selected constituents combined with visual core stratigraphy (Alley et al.1993; Hammer et al. in press,1999?; Hammer et al. 1978; Meese et al. 1997).
In January 1998, the collaborative ice-drilling project between Russia, the United States, and France at the Russian Vostok station in East Antarctica yielded the deepest ice core ever recovered, reaching a depth of 3,623 m (Petit et al. 1997, 1999). Preliminary data indicate the Vostok ice-core record extends through four climate cycles, with ice slightly older than 400 kyr (Petit et al. 1997, 1999).
Devils Hole is a tectonically formed cave developed in the discharge zone of a regional aquifer in south-central Nevada. (See Riggs, et al., 1994.) The walls of this subaqueous cavern are coated with dense vein calcite which provides an ideal material for precise uranium-series dating via thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS). Devils Hole Core DH-11 is a 36-cm-long core of vein calcite from which we obtained an approximately 500,000-year-long continuous record of paleotemperature and other climatic proxies. Data from this core were recently used by Winograd and others (1997) to discuss the length and stability of the last four interglaciations.
The Devils Hole d18O record is an indicator of paleotemperature and corresponds in timing and magnitude to paleo-SST (sea surface temperature) recorded in Pacific Ocean sediments off the California and Oregon coasts. The record is also highly correlated with major variations in temperature in the Vostok ice core, from the East Antarctic plateau.
As eminent a geochemist as W. Broecker has stated that "...the Devils Hole chronology is the best we have..." Since 1992, all core material has been uranium-series dated using thermal ionization mass spectrometric (TIMS) methodology. In 1997, the Devils Hole Thorium-230 dates were independently confirmed by non-USGS investigators using Protactinium-231.
because they have been contaminated
Man-made artifacts - such as the hammer in Cretaceous rock, a human sandal print with trilobite in Cambrian rock, human footprints and a handprint in Cretaceous rock – point to the fact that all the supposed geologic periods actually occurred at the same time in the recent past.11
A living cell is so awesomely complex that its interdependent components stagger the imagination and defy evolutionary explanations. A minimal cell contains over 60,000 proteins of 100 different configurations.16 The chance of this assemblage occurring by chance is 1 in 10 4,478,296 .17