Why is everyone so sure that McKinney's actions were intentional? The U.S. Attorney's office is investigating the matter. However, no charges as of yet have been filed by the cop or the Capitol police. Why is the U.S. Attorney's office dragging this out if they are all set to condemn Ms. McKinney for her actions?
Why isn't the cop investigated? Why is everyone readily believing the cop's side? It would be interesting to see his record and his attitudes as well.
Why weren't her calls for racial profiling taken seriously and investigated? I could probably guess the answers. However, there have been other incidents between people of color and the Capitol police. And they weren't just with everyday people. Some occurrences happened with Congresspeople such as Rep. Louis Stokes (D-Ohio) as well as Black police officers within U.S. Capitol Police.
But Lucinda Marshall in in her essay might have another answer:
Laurel Thatcher Ulrich once pointed out that, "Well behaved women rarely make history." Perhaps she should have added that women who are deemed to have thrown what Marianne Means characterized as a "hissy fit" will surely become infamous.
While most of us would agree that taking a swing at a police officer is not a well considered thing to do, that does not invalidate McKinney's charges of racism and inappropriate touching. Nor does it justify the vicious and ignorant political and media lynching that followed[...]Nor is this is not the only time that charges of racial discrimination have been leveled against the Capitol Police. In 2001, Black Capitol police officers filed a racial discrimination suit against the department. Inappropriate behavior towards Black legislators has also not been limited to the nation's capitol. At Coretta Scott King's funeral, the Georgia Legislative Black Caucus was not allowed to join the funeral procession because the Georgia Capitol police did not recognize them as elected officials.
Astoundingly, the media lost no time in broadcasting Tom DeLay's pronouncement that ethics charges should be brought against McKinney for her "outrageous" behavior. Did they think that a man who spearheaded a redistricting plan that the Justice Department has deemed to be in violation of the Voting Rights Act and who is leaving office because of his own unethical behavior was qualified to make such charges?
Several questions could be discerned from seattlelaw's explaination of battery as well:
Orginally quoted by seattlelaw
Your definition actually doesn't contain the three required elements for criminal battery. These include (1) the conduct itself, i.e., touching, (2) the mens rea or mental state of the defendant, and (3) the necessary harmful result to the person.
Why wouldn't the mental state of Ms. McKinney be investigated? I've read many an article, blog and op-ed piece saying Ms. McKinney's "crazy". Where's the clinical analysis of her behavior and state of mind (One should be worried if a clinical analysis comes back and deems her a psychopath)?
Well then, if she was truly found insane, she wouldn't be convicted because she would not know the extensivity of her actions toward the cop. Wouldn't that be the case? So justice couldn't truly be served by the naysayers because she would ultimately be found mentally incompetent. Be careful what you wish for.
And I also agree that if the cop suffered terribly from Ms. McKinney's supposed "punch", the press would have been all over it. No one likes a good story without the blood and the gore. And if Ms. McKinney truly "battered" the cop, don't you think that they would show the pictures to prove how "crazy" and "brutal" she is? Knowing the "stereotypes" that have been used to describe her personality, it would be quick and easy to condemn her if she truly did damage to the officer--especially if the cop suffered "after effects" from the hit (such as muscle damage, blood clots, etc.).
Think about it. After Mr. Cheney supposedly shot his "acquaintance" the lawyer, day-by-day medical reports (especially with the heart-attack he suffered) were littered with follow-ups on the victim's condition. So, why be mum about the cop's condition if he was hurt by McKinney?
Why is the definition of battery from Black's Law so hard to believe? It is the definitive law dictionary. I compare it to DSM-IV in psychology.
Thirdly, there are only 14 Black women Congressmembers in all. And if Ms. McKinney is only one in a building of 251 members, how hard would it be for a security guard, say three years into the job, to miss her?
Also adding to this idea is the remarks of Rep. Shelia Jackson Lee (D-Tx) who was interviewed ondemocracynow.org :
REP. SHEILA JACKSON LEE: First of all, I think all of us, including Congresswoman McKinney, respects the Capitol police and respects them for their responsibility and their job. But I believe that she is quite accurate in the fact that there are very few of us who happen to be African American women, and there are very few of us who would be so, if you will, difficult to be remembered, if you will, or to be able to be noticed. And frankly, many of us get either confused or asked for our I.D. or treated in a manner that is not necessarily accepting. And in this incident it was unfortunate. But it is the role of the Capitol police, of whom we respect, to basically know the members of the United States Congress. And if you are rushing toward a vote, a House vote -- and I think people should understand we have 15 minutes to cast a vote no matter where you might be in the entire capital of Washington, D.C. You might be in meetings off the Hill. You still have 15 minutes to vote. It's very difficult then to be stopped, while the clock is ticking, for to you cast your vote.
So I think this is a question, first of all, where it should be resolved away from the cameras. I certainly don't think an arrest warrant is appropriate. I hope that the arrest warrant is not issued so that there can be an issue on the Democratic side of the aisle, while there is an issue now with Tom DeLay on the Republican side of the aisle. And I hope that this can be resolved, respecting the Capitol police, respecting Congresswoman McKinney, who serves well in the United States Congress and serves her constituents. And most of all, I hope that we can reconcile this issue, so that we can continue our work. I think it's an issue that clearly has the opportunity to be reconciled outside the legal process and that any difficulty in identification can be solved in an administrative manner.
In fact, Ms. Lee continues to explain what happens to Congressmembers of color as well as the procedure regarding I.D. pins:
AMY GOODMAN: Has this ever happened to you, where you were not recognized?
REP. SHEILA JACKSON LEE: Oh, on several occasions. And, of course, you have to suffer the indignity and sometimes handle it in a way that you don't care to handle it, because of the fact that you believe that you've served in the United States Congress and that you should be identifiable. So there is merit to the points that she is making. And there certainly may some concerns about securing the Capitol, which we understand has taken a whole different tone after 9/11.
But I think cooler heads can address this question in a way other than the criminal justice system of issuing an arrest warrant for a member of the United States Congress, who was within her right to be in the building and was within her right to be rushing toward the House floor to vote, as I understand the facts, and certainly should have had the courtesies of the Capitol police, as we should extend courtesies. So why can't this be resolved, where we learn who each other happens to be and we improve the picture book, if you will, and the training, so that we all can be fully identified.
There is no requirement, by the way, for any member to have an I.D. We do have them. But we may have been rushing from somewhere and not carrying the I.D., and there is no requirement for us to have a pin, which is our identifying pin, which I happen to be wearing at this time. But there is no requirement, as a understand it, for members to have that at this time.
And here is something to add to the conspiracy bandwagon about the high-tech "lynching" of Ms. McKinney:
wikipedia.org
Rep. McKinney is a co-sponsor of Rep. John Conyers's H. Res 635, which would create a Select Committee to look into potential grounds for the impeachment of President Bush. On January 20th, 2006, she also signed a statement by the group The World Can't Wait called Drive Out the Bush Regime.
I will wait to see the results.
[edit on 11-4-2006 by ceci2006]
[edit on 11-4-2006 by ceci2006]








