In The Sex- Neutral, Color-Blind society Democrats want so bad, Cynthia McKinney would Be In Jail!!, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 6-4-2006 @ 11:30 AM by dbates
It was only a matter of time. I'm sure it won't be long until her apologies turn into groveling. I bet she does regret the escalation. She's the escalator operator and the only rider on the escalator at the same time.


McKinney Apologizes for Incident With Cop

"There should not have been any physical contact in this incident," McKinney said in brief remarks on the House floor. "I am sorry that this misunderstanding happened at all and I regret its escalation and I apologize."



reply posted on 6-4-2006 @ 06:20 PM by Toelint
Okay, Hottie since you seem so incensed with getting a response to your first post, I'll give it a shot.

Originally posted by HarlemHottie
And people say racism is dead...


The only people who keep insisting it's alive are those who have a vested interest in KEEPING it alive.

I saw her on CNN with Wolf Blitzer on Tues., and he, too, and brought up the issue of her change of hairstyle.


That, in my opinion, puts him right up there with Larry King. "So, what IS your favorite ice cream anyway?"

My first thought was, Don't white women change their hair? (Of course)


Yes, they do, and when they do, WHITE MEN have to do a double-take.

The second, Damn, do we all really all look alike to white people? (I don't think so, but how else can you explain this rather shabby defense?


What's so shabby about it? The first thing I notice about my friends is whether or not they still HAVE hair!

To me, what Wolf seemed to be implying was that they hadn't actually used her face for identification, they had used her hair. This can't be true. Could someone please explain this?


The fact is, they shouldn't have used her face OR her hair...they should have used her ID!

And, in reference to the oft-repeated excuse that one couldn't possibly remember all 435 members, BS.

Did you know everyone in your highschool?


I knew six...maybe seven people in my high school, not including my teachers and the principal. Did you know everyone in YOUR highschool?

Sixteen year old Congressional pages are required to recognize all 435 of them by face, and to know their names,


We have Sixteen-year-old pages working in the Nations Capitol?

so, until we establish that the Capitol Police are as inept and incompetant as our Chimp-in-Chief,


This pretty much sums up your viewpoint. You should have started with this line and saved us a lot of spare reading.

they should be held, at the very least, to the same standards as the interns.


There's a difference between a page and an intern. Check it out.

*shakes head in complete and total disgust*


Me too, but only from my headache!






reply posted on 6-4-2006 @ 08:27 PM by Odium
Wait...

Just to clear this up, is it assault or battery? Because there is a difference between the two of them. If it is battery [ or aggravated assault] or just assault? To be fair, assault can consist of me patting you on the back or in fact any act which involves me touching another person against their will resulting in actual or percieved physical harm.

Assault could consist of her waving her bag around her head and claiming she'd kill him. Furthermore, many aspects of assault are not a felony and thus are a civil matter [which is why she'd not be in jail.] Also, it is now being defined as a "scuffle" and the media is reporting it as a single strike with her mobile phone.

You also all over-look the fact members of congress do not go through the metal detectors[1]. Along with the fact the prior to this the security guards have mistaken her white-23 year old aid as being the congress woman. Along with the fact she makes a point of not wearing her security badge and it's publically known - so clearly those who voted for her, know she won't wear it and want her not to have to wear it.

The odd thing is about it all, is her stand. People seem to over-look which groups she works with, what bills she has tried to place into power. The whole 9/11 view she holds - this can be used as a fantastic way to discredit her and after all this is meant to be a conspiracy website.

[1]http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060330-120057-3228r


reply posted on 7-4-2006 @ 05:06 AM by ceci2006
Originally quoted by El senor Pom pom
Not sure if your talking about me or not but all of my judgements were made AFTER watching her LIVE interview on CNN and looking at the Photo Comparison on TDS. So yeah... I made an unbiased(seeing as i am a left leaning Independant) observation. I knew nothing about her past run-ins with the Bush Administration..and while its nice that she has come out and challenged the Administration. What she is doing is just a micro-examaple of the Macro-problem. All government officials, or rather most since using words like all and never are counter-intuitive, feel/believe they are above the law. the problem is She broke the law and is unwilling to except the consequences.


El senor Pom pom, I was referring to your post because it described the very same things that I talked about in my post. I could understand if you were talking about the policies of Ms. McKinney, but you weren't. Your post, imho, sounded like something that Neal Boortz said, when referring to her as "ghetto trash". You reverted to what HarlemHottie was trying to explain in her post: denigrating an African-American woman by her looks.

It frustrates me that some of the comments complaining that Ms. McKinney "uses the race card", some of the commentators forgot they were doing the same. Or was it all right to dehumanize her when she has a legitimate right to complain? After all, she was not being "recognized" over and over.

But then again, I saw that when you viewed The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and he was using her looks as a comedy routine, I could only figure that you were just as susceptible to putting her down in the same way. Because of that, I don't really think that you were being unbiased in your attempt. It was as if you were just falling into the same camp as the others who "accuse" her of the "race card".

I see from your latest post that you did change your mind. For that, I commend you. However, I do not agree with your statement that everyone here at ATS is okay with a government official breaking the law (that is what you meant by G.O., yes?). I'm not. And I especially replied in my post that her behavior was not excusable.

Generally:

I can only say, that it frustrates me how easy it is for people to use comments like "Black Crack Hoe", 'idiot", "nut" and "crazy" as well as giving tips about "how a Congresswoman is supposed to dress" when in the same breath, they are saying what a "racist, sexist" person she is. I just want to ask, "Are they actually saying what they think about African-American women (if, not people in general) or are they just being hypocritical only for this post?" What frustrates me more is the fact that some commentators can feel as if they are both the "fashion police" and the "behavior police" when in the same breath, they would not know how to act in the same way.

We can talk about this situation at a distance. But unfortunately, no one knows how they would act on impulse.

No wonder Ms. McKinney is mad. Heck. How would you feel if some officer grabbed you inappropriately(No one ever said how he grabbed her.)? Let's say the cop, feeling his oats, grabbed your buttocks while trying to catch you. He's thinking, "You're no better than me. How dare you walk past me thinking that you're 'uppity'. I'm going to teach you a lesson."(After all, who knows what he was thinking?) Would your "fight or flight" instincts take over? Would you swing around to hit him? Or would you just smile, and say, "Thank you, may I have another?"

The problem here I see is that no one in this thread has ever had the experience of people clutching their purses as they walk by. Or, in a mall, a security guard following you for half a mile? Or getting separated from the rest of a flight and have a "special pat down" while the rest of the passengers wait. If these things happened to you on a regular basis, you might want to be angry too. You might want to act like a nut. Heck, you might even feel nuts.

I'm sorry the gloves are off on this post. Usually, I am a very considerate, tolerant and kind person. In fact, I love people. But, I can't stand it when a group of people who have no concept of a person of color's experience with the law do a verbal beatdown on one, little African-American woman. Ms. McKinney deserves dignity--which some of the naysayers will not give.






[edit on 7-4-2006 by ceci2006]


reply posted on 7-4-2006 @ 07:53 AM by FlyersFan
Originally posted by ceci2006
was it all right to dehumanize her when she has a legitimate right to complain? After all, she was not being "recognized" over and over.

She had no right to complain. SHE is the one who didn't follow the
rules. SHE is the one that 'forgets' her ID. Others who forget their
ID have no problem walking through a metal detector. It's no big
deal. She could have done it. AND as far as her complaining about
'not being recognized' .. facial recognition isn't the only criteria for
entrance to the Capitol without going through the metal detectors.
ID is required. It's the law. She shouldn't be above the law simply
because she's a black woman.

"Are they actually saying what they think about African-American women (if, not people in general)


Where did you see 'all black women are nutz'?? No where. This is
about McKinney alone. That is obvious.

Heck. How would you feel if some officer grabbed you inappropriately(No one ever said how he grabbed her

She claims she was grabbed inappropriately. However, when questioned
on TV by reporters she refuses to say exactly how she was so
' inappropriately' grabbed. The Capitol security guard said that when
she refused his order to stop and come back to go through the metal
detectors that he grabbed her arm to stop her. That's minimal
restraint and has nothing to do with 'buttocks' as you brought up.

But, I can't stand it when a group of people who have no concept
of a person of color's experience with the law do a verbal beatdown on
one, little African-American woman.


She's not 'one little african-american woman'. She's a member of congress
who did not follow security rules in our nation's Capitol building. She is
a member of congress who struck a Capitol security guard for no good
reason. What other experiences she may or may not have had with
other law enforcement are not relevant. Her 'color experience' is not
relevant either.

It was a very simple rule to follow. It is there for a good reason.
She refused to follow it. She refused to do as all the others do when
they forget their ID ... a simple walk through a metal detector.
That's it. All the others do it. She shouldn't be exempt just because
she's a black female with a bad attitude.

Ms. McKinney deserves dignity--


WE THE PEOPLE deserve to have members of congress who will follow
the security rules that are in place. WE THE PEOPLE deserve to have
our security officers treated with dignity and to be obeyed. If the
TV is treating Ms. McKinney like a laughing stock, she has only herself
to blame.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Australian schoolyard bullies to face job ban
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
No Indians or Asians job ad triggers outrage in Australia
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
Iran and the USA
  Posted 1 days ago with 2 member flags
Biden To Skip Tampa: Latest
  Posted 17 days ago with 1 member flags
Three axed ministers CRIED
  Posted 5 days ago with 1 member flags
Asia should have its own Facebook, Twitter: China official
  Posted 6 days ago with 0 member flags
Australia moves to buy $3b spy drone fleet
  Posted 2 days ago with 0 member flags