It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Britain as Prime Player
FTAA / NAFTA "Free" Trade
Emotional Hot Buttons
Amalgamation of the Americas
British East India Co.
RIIA meeting of 1937
"Morals and Dogma" by Albert Pike
Life Begins at "40"
Perfecting the Profane
Front of Charity
WWI and LON
Mandel House Biography
"Between Two Ages" by Zbigniew Brzezinski
Marx to Lincoln Letter
Machiavelli Think Tanks
FEMA isn't your MA
Canadian Blood Scandal
New Capital of the Americas
Pierre Trudeau's Agenda
Is 33 the Highest Degree?
Reuters / API
"Millenium" by Jacques Attali
33 Signers of Dec. of Independence
ORDO AB CHAO
Pike: Our God Is Lucifer
Loyola Bioengineering Meeting
"The Next Million Years" by Charles Galton Darwin
David Icke Explained
Previous Ages of Man
Tacitus and the Druids
Tesla and HAARP
Originally posted by ConspiracyNut23
John Dee first coined the termed World Order and talked about the plans to install their system on a world scale.
Originally posted by prophetfxb
I doubt there is a higher degree than the 33. Isnt the whole premise of the thing based on 3's and some sort of trinity. I think anything higher than that associated with a number goes againt what it stands for.
Originally posted by lcflutter
Alan Watt claims that high freemasonry goes up to the 360th degree (degrees in a circle), that certain lodges have more degrees than others (Alister Crowley's OTO, for example, goes up into the 90s), that freemasonry itself of course is one "face" for a class of forever-ruling elite families with their own religion.
They believe the common masses are profane (in the dark),
According to Alan, early well-known practitioners of what is today known as "freemasonry" include Pythagoras and Aristotle, who were trained in the "mystery arts" of Egypt (the masters of controlling humans) and returned to their own countries to found secret societies of the elite, and plant the seeds of revolution.
Today's masonic symbols draw much from Pythagorean mathematical religion (including the pentagram, the pervasive 5-pointed star.. this also explains why freemasons, and the New Age, are so into numerology).
Aristotle of course went on to teach Plato, who wrote The Republic, which basically describes the communist/socialist/New World Order caste system of today: a mass of slaves to be guided and directed, a small intellectual elite of bureaucrats at the top making all of the decisions, and a privileged military class to protect the elites and keep the masses in line.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Actually, Plato taught Aristotle, not the other way around. Plato was taught by Socrates. It is quite obvious that Watts has never read the Republic, or else he is purposely misinterpreting it. The "masses" are not made "slaves" in the Republic. Instead, in the Republic, each individual is trained in the Craft that is best suited to him by nature. The Republic does not protect artificial elites, as do most democratic capitalist systems of today, but instead optimizes natural skill. In it, only the wisest and most benevolent may become statesmen, ensuring the virtue of the Republic. It is a utopian scenario that seeks to maximize the happiness and worth of each individual citizen by allowing him or her to exercise the gifts bestowed upon them by nature. But furthermore, the allegory is more importantly viewed as to the nature of soul, and it is in this context that the Republic is viewed as divinely inspired by High Initiates.
The Republic does not protect artificial elites, as do most democratic capitalist systems of today
Originally posted by Tamahu
From what we can understand of Plato's teachings, he must have received Initiation from Khemetian Priests who had not fallen into corruption.
What we have today, can hardly be called a "Civilization" at all.
But the learned-ignoramus know-it-all politicians, false-scientists and modern "philosphers", tend to look down on the Ancients without any reverence whatsoever.