This topic is in the Regional Politics discussion forum.  (rss)


ID Cards Compulsory in UK by 2010 - Official


<<  12    13    14    15  >>



reply posted on 2-2-2007 @ 11:43 AM by ImaginaryReality1984



Originally posted by Spuggy
I'm hoping that they move from cards to implants as soon as possible. I'd get an implant as soon as they were available, as would most of my friends. I don't see it as sinister, it's convenient. The number of times I've lost my cash card, passport, NI number, I'm currently far more at risk of identity fraud than I would be if I had a chip in my wrist. Sure it'll be abused by the governments and the criminal set, but the present forms of ID are allready abused by both and far more easily.

I don't believe any of this end of times NWO bull# so frankly I can see nothing but upsides. Chip me.


Erm you know very little about RFID technology, copying someones chip would be possible. Look at passports, the "secure" RFID chip in that has already been cloned, effectively giving someone a way to make new passports if they have the algorithm.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-2-2007 @ 05:24 AM by Spuggy


It really doesn't bother me. Even if someone could remotely download and then upload all my details from a chip, who cares, currently all I have to do is drop my cash card and they have the same powers.

Cash card - need chip info, need pin, can be lost
Implant - need chip info, need pin, can't be lost.

My maths ain't all that shiny but it seems to me the implant removes one variable making it slightly safer.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-2-2007 @ 05:35 AM by ImaginaryReality1984


You are forgettign something, if you get your ID stolen when you have a chip in your hand, then you will NOT be getting that money back. It will take many years before they admit it isn't secure, and in that time loads of people will lose a lot of money.

Look at it this way, the chip will not improve security so why the hell should we have it?

EDIT

Oh and the new PIN would be your fingerprint or something else, these are easily gained from latent prints. So you go to a cafe and have a coffee, whilst in there a waitress scans the chip and now has that info, they get your cup and lift a print, two days later you are robbed. For anyone who thinks this is paronoia or science fiction, well i myself practiced with latent prints after reading about Tsutomo Matsumotos experiments with it years ago. I myself could copy my own prints easily, it's a joke it's being promoted as secure.

[edit on 5-2-2007 by ImaginaryReality1984]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-2-2007 @ 05:58 AM by Spuggy


I don't see how it would be harder to prove that someone had stolen my ID and used it than it would be that someone has stolen my cash card. The only real difference would be you wouldn't necessarily know.
Even so, with these sort of crimes it is either so easy that the powers that be do something, or it's so hard that very few people bother doing it.

Although Identity theft is a growing concern, its growing in an environment where implants aren't currently used. We'll only know the true extent of its abuse if / when it comes into action.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-4-2007 @ 12:46 PM by MistahBear


THREE SALIENT POINTS:

1)The police ALREADY
have the power of arrest and detention if you cannot prove your identity for any reason.

2)It`s a PHENOMENAL waste of money that could be better spent, especially considering the govts poor record on implementing IT schemes(always over budget, inefficient and contracts for implementation done on a very selective basis and almost always not going to the best company.)

3)I have NEVER heard a single argument in favour of these that stands up to logical analysis. `Terrorists` could duplicate any technology we could use, and there is no substitute for mindful vigilance and understanding. Why should we be in danger of losing our liberties and money when we`re the innocent ones?! Having all our records on a database somewhere is surely asking for trouble? If Gary McKinnon could hack into the pentagon using BLANK admiistrator passwords, something`s definitely wrong somewhere. Although, I do muchly suspect that the Pentafgon did this in order to recruit/catch halfway good hackers.

Please somebody give me a good answer as to why we need these things!! How much for a replacement if our wallet gets stolen or we lose them? All these unanswered Q`s and No real answers. Hmmmm...

[edit on 23-4-2007 by MistahBear]

[edit on 23-4-2007 by MistahBear]

[edit on 23-4-2007 by MistahBear]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-4-2007 @ 01:55 PM by ImaginaryReality1984



Originally posted by MistahBear
Having all our records on a database somewhere is surely asking for trouble? If Gary McKinnon could hack into the pentagon using BLANK admiistrator passwords, something`s definitely wrong somewhere. Although, I do muchly suspect that the Pentafgon did this in order to recruit/catch halfway good hackers.
[edit on 23-4-2007 by MistahBear]


Just to comment on this part, Gary mckinnon isn't a good hacker, he did something that was so simple it was embarrassing for the states. They didn't catch any good hackers, they caught people using extremely basic techniques. Seriously i work in the IT industry and this crime was so very basic on a technical leval i can't even convey how easy it is to do.

As for the database being unsecure, well yes i admit this worries me deeply. If this system is tied into our daily lives then i really do think someone will access it illegally.

Also remember that we will need people to enter information into this database, whats to stop a criminal gang infiltrating it and creating false identities? Afterall the banking system was infiltrated with people stealing peoples details.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-4-2007 @ 02:36 PM by MistahBear


OK, maybe halfway good hackers was going too far...(Retraction) I know he was doing something incredibly simple, hence my assertion that the pentagon was probably phishing or making a honeytrap or whatever. Posterboy for the new breed of incompetent bedroom geek brought up on cheesy movies like `wargames` etc. or whatever Hollywood is pushing these days. However, I`m glad you get the point anyhow. Wish more people would object to this before the law is unretractable, possibly is already too late.
I like my own company with nature or whatever, would hate to think that I was being tracked everywhere I go. Having said that, for 15 squid you can get anybody`s mobile tracked and four locations sent to you over a day or two(something similar anyhow), while you can also choose to have msgs sent to them telling them they`re being tracked. Freely available service over the internet.
At least you could leave yr mobile at home if you wanted...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-6-2007 @ 10:21 AM by AdamJ


Plans to Multiply the Uses of ID cards

"But plans to "multiply the uses" of the ID scheme would mean there should be stronger accountability to Parliament."

BBC News



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  12    13    14    15  >>







Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:

















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 2.148 seconds
Page processed in 0.178 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread