ID Cards Compulsory in UK by 2010 - Official, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 3-4-2006 @ 10:53 AM by AdamJ
Originally posted by alienanderson
Yep, now is definitely the time to get a new passport

Biometric passports have been introduced this year, but only facial biometrics are captured at the moment

UK Biometric Passport FAQ

Fingerprinting is not due yet but it is on its way, and I believe DNA capture to be the goal


The Stepping Stones:

2006 - Biometric Passport introduced
2007 - Compulsory Fingerprinting when renewing passport
2008 - DNA collection?
2010 - Compulsory ID cards
2020 - Microchipped Population?



External Source
Electronic Passport Forum link

...The introduction of electronic travel documents worldwide will pave the way towards the much broader market penetration of RFID and biometric technology in the areas of citizen ID and eGovernment projects.


2006 infrastructure set up for move towards machine readable travel documents:

ePassports
National IDs
Visas

As it says above it will 'pave the way' to wards penetration of RFID technology. Already RFID implant chip technology exist for records, tracking, buy and sell (link)
As RFID further intergrates into civilian life, the National ID card will be increasinlgly needed to access full citizenship 'rights' to prove you are a non-terrorist.
RFID chips will alredy have been impanted in millions, through body art, prisoners, arested people, for medical records. The technology will advance and price will decrease. by 2020 there will be legislation to replace the now necesaray national ID card with an implanted chip whcih can carry out all those functions of the current ones. Obviously it will be mandatory as ID cards will be phased out.

[edit on 3-4-2006 by AdamJ]

[edit on 3-4-2006 by AdamJ]


reply posted on 3-4-2006 @ 04:45 PM by Knights
Shaunybaby- I really do feel we are in an inevitable decline. Many people, too many infact have suggested these 'coups', standing up and overthrowing the Government. Now be reasonable, as you wrote millions died for our freedom.. many more will die if you attempted such action.

The Government is in control of public services, do you actually think this country will be peaceful and we'll have our freedom IF they were overthrown?? Of course not.

Firstly- The Government has control of police and the army.. are you actually going to stand up to them? The Government won't just hand over the keys.. in effect you a proposing a civil war and if it were me I know i'd be safer with the Government.

Secondly- Without the police and army there, do you actually think people will behave as they should? Of course not, shops will be getting burgled, cars stolen, rape.. the streets and country would erupt into anarchy if people thought they could get away without being punished. A certain authority needs to remain.

Thirdly- From a personal view I object to these plans entirely. I do not feel violence is the answer however. Petitions, protests..even moving to a different country would put a stop to it.

Fourth- If this 'coup' was to occour.. violence is not the answer. Infact FAR from it.. if they have all these extra plans in motion won't they use the uprising as an excuse to actually take control. They have a fullblown REASON to watch everymove people make.

I really do oppose.. I just don't think it's a war that can be won.. unless people actually open their eyes to stop seeing themselves as not being criminals and thus have nothing to hide viewpoints.



reply posted on 3-4-2006 @ 05:49 PM by ImaginaryReality1984

It's wierd, the other week I was compared to Karl Marx and today I'm all 'for' civil war.


Lol I nearly fell off my chair at that one.


There are roughly 60 million people in this country. I reckon maybe 2 million at absolute most would be willing to take physical action, and I think that is a generous guess. This isn't enough people to actually do anything, we might provoke others to attack us but it would be over quickly and the ones against id cards would lose.

I truly do believe that most British people would not go beyond peaceful protest. All the idiots who sit around and drink all day, wear hoodies at night and mug old grannies wouldn't even care. They would be nice little sheep and do whatever the government wanted as long as they could still drink and mug people.

The middle classes are renowned for following the government. I don't believe many from that bracket would bother even objecting.

The upper classes wouldn't care for the most part, why would they?

It's only a few of us who would take action, and it's only a few of us that even care. Many people will say we are obsessed with conspiracy and dispel our ideas that way. Personally I don't get to involved with discussions on NWO and the like, I am looking at it from a freedom and money view. The amount it will cost is truly disgusting and as stated earlier, why should I pay for a card that gives me nothing but trouble. That vast quantity of money could go a long way.

Let's be conservative and say the cards will everyone 50 pounds each. This does not include the cost of the systems, it's just the cards. So 50 pounds x 60 million = 3 billion. Think what that could do, finally this week many doctors have said that the NHS can no longer remain free for all. This was obvious a long time ago and they want us to pay for ID cards instead of the NHS.

Oh excuse my grammar and spelling.


[edit on 3-4-2006 by Riwka]


reply posted on 3-4-2006 @ 09:26 PM by DYepes
Knights you might as well not complain about any security measure because you have just stated you will do whatever the government does so you can save your skin. I suppose that kind of attitude would fly with athiests, but those of religious backgrounds and strong faith believe that death will be a release. So therefore if they have to spend the remainder of their mortal lives under the ever watchful and pervasive eyes of power hungry, immoral, apathetic, and selfish parasites who call themselves leaders they will be more than willing to fight for their rights as free humans.

It is happening now in Iraq, as well as Afghanistan, and those are only a few thousand, who have less road access and live in harsher environments. Much of the United States has fertile land where a variety of foods can be grown to support populations whivh have been cut-off.

You also fail to take into acccount exactly how much even only 2 million people is. And as you can tell, you have seen what the non-violent approach is achieving , absolutley nothing.

So take a backseat and watch as your countrymen are murdered fighting for their freedom. Don't actu surprised though when a unit of government sldiers comes knocing at your door explaining "ok you have to have these microchips imbedded as well as these surveilance cameras installed or you will have to be detained. It will be at that point you wish you would have done something sooner,because at that point you have no option for escape.



reply posted on 4-4-2006 @ 04:28 AM by ImaginaryReality1984
Originally posted by DYepes
Knights you might as well not complain about any security measure because you have just stated you will do whatever the government does so you can save your skin. I suppose that kind of attitude would fly with athiests, but those of religious backgrounds and strong faith believe that death will be a release. So therefore if they have to spend the remainder of their mortal lives under the ever watchful and pervasive eyes of power hungry, immoral, apathetic, and selfish parasites who call themselves leaders they will be more than willing to fight for their rights as free humans.


so you can save your own skin


When i say i would do nothing it's because i honestly believe that such a small minority in a country like ours would do nothing. I believe that you would have ordinary citizens turn on us. I am willing to do something about it, and that's leave this country. Not just for that reason but others as i have stated.

If more people were willing and able then i would happily join in, but maybe follwoing the classic line of "Live to fight another day" would work well here. Build up a movement before taking action, and i think you would need a good 10% of the population to do so. If the movement against such cards began to grow through us talking about it peacefully then we could take action.

I am not a coward, i would fight but not for a pointless battle. In that kind of situation the first battle would be the last so you need to make sure you win. But i honestly believe we are talking about a rather large scale action here and it would damage the country for many years. I don't mean the infrastructure i mean economically and politically.

Lately tensions have been rising over illegal immigrants and political correctness. I honestly beleive we will see a full scale civil war before we see fights over ID cards. That is very worrying to me.

By the way, you had a little poke at atheists there (fair enough) but i will say that religion has no place in this argument. I have nothing against religion (yes honestly) but in this argument it will only hinder rather than help.

Mentioning things like the "Mark of the beast" and the "New World Order" will only give critics of our arguements extra ammunition. If the average person heard such terms then they would label us as nutters and all our ideas could easily be swept aside as raving paranoia.

Don't give them more ammunition then they should have.

[edit on 4-4-2006 by ImaginaryReality1984]

[edit on 4-4-2006 by ImaginaryReality1984]


reply posted on 4-4-2006 @ 08:05 AM by alienanderson
Further to earlier posts on the worlwide rollout of ID Cards and Biometric Passports here's a few links


BBC News from 30 March 2004 - Concern over Global ID System (predicted implementation 2015)

"We are increasingly concerned that the biometric travel document initiative is part and parcel of a larger surveillance infrastructure monitoring the movements of individuals globally," said civil liberty groups Privacy International and the American Civil Liberties Union.


Silicon News 3 April 2006 - Developments in South East Asia

Singapore is the second country in Asia after Thailand to introduce e-passports, Tan said, though the Thai government's initiative was not designed to meet the requirements of the US Visa Waiver Program.


The above article also states the Australia and New Zealand have been involved in the testing

It's a shame that Thailand is also involved, as I was hoping that Thailand might be a safe place to go live. At least their system is not compatable with the US system (yet)

And I believe Malaysia of all places is at the forefront, with their national ID card 'MyKad'

The UK/US Biometric Passport schemes are very similar:

ATS Thread on US Biometric Passport (with pictures)




[edit on 4/4/2006 by alienanderson]

[edit on 4/4/2006 by alienanderson]
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



Republicans in Arizona plan to nearly wipe out public unions
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
Tennessee threatens suit against man building boat with his son.
  Posted 4 days ago with 4 member flags
Arizona may initiate an ARMED State Militia
  Posted 0 days ago with 3 member flags
The CULT of Ron Paul
  Posted 17 days ago with 1 member flags
A Protest Technique From Russia (Lighten up OWS)
  Posted 13 days ago with 0 member flags