It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Again Disturbed, I agree, Bush didn't spend that 2+Trillion on Iraq, most of it went into parites for 13 year old girls, new cars, mansions, and bank accounts in Switzerland. WHy do you think the Preisdent of Halliburton is flying around in a new Private Jet? Has bought more/new cars each costing at least 200 thousand dollars, while the troops don't have armor for anything, or food, or clean water!
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
The attempt at putting together an Iraqi security force started shortly after the invasion
They still have protection. They aren't defenseless.
Your suggestion that some insurgent leaders may be equipped better is what's laughable.
What exactly is your point? They are adding armor to a humvee, which is luxury most in the world simply do not have.
The government never promised to give them anything. Nor have they all been training with armored humvees and the very best body armor.
America is constantly phazing out equipment and introducing new pieces. When, exactly, is it ok to go to war? Every soldier is never going to have the top of the line material. The kevlar and armored humvees are both new.
America was completely unprepared heading into, WW2,....
The IDF is a force trained specifically to fight low-tech, guerilla conflicts. In case you haven't noticed, they have a little spat going on with the Palestinians, and have for some time.
I don't know if the Israelis have armored humvees and the interceptor armor. Going to bet you don't, either.
They didnt put up a decent police force in 9 months time forget an army !
If anyone can buy this extra armour over the net, I guess it would be impossible for terrorists to procure it ! That makes sense.
Pay attention: The Humvee is NOT meant to deal with the role the US military is playing there(guerilla warfare). There are NO vehicles in the US army that are specifically designed for countering guerilla warefare that were used in Iraq.
Attention: Our Allies dont have Humvees not because they cant BUY them but because they dont want them.
If greece can buy Humvees anybody can buy them !! (note: rhetorical! )
BS! It is the duty of the army to provide its soldiers with all required equipment failure to do so, is failure of command. If this was done on purpose, generals can face diciplinary action and even get court marshalled ?
What next, are you going to tell them, we didnt promise you bullets, go buy your own?
America was unprepared for WW2 ???
I am wasting my time here........
IDF is a professional military whether you believe this or not. And yes they do have "up-armoured" humvees and FYI it is called up-armoured not armoured because basically all Humvees are armoured to withstand a .22 but few can with stand 7.56rounds thus extra armour is added to it.
Not only do they have up-armoured Humvees they also have a whole range of vehicles that are specifically designed for urban combat.
So I guess you just refused to read the link- propaganda peice apparently !
Ignorance is NOT Bliss.
Murray Neal, CEO of Pinnacle Armor, has told us that both Level III/III+ and Level IV (classified) Dragon Skin have undergone testing at the U.S. Army Aberdeen Test Center (ATC) and Army Research Laboratory (ARL)--to Secretary of Defense Standards (military standards), no less--and passed those tests. This information would seem to be at direct odds the following statements made by Mr. Sorenson: "In some cases we haven't seen this capability ... has done anything to provide force protection we evaluate is even standard," and "all other claims being made (about Dragon Skin are) ... exactly what they are: claims." It’s our understanding that the DoD ballistic test standards mentioned above are more stringent than NIJ standards. In those tests (which did happen, by the way), Dragon Skin reportedly...
proved to be superior to Interceptor body armor. ATC and ARL are both recognized and trusted Department of Defense (DoD) test facilities (including ballistic testing), but they don’t appear to be Natick’s and PEO’s preferred ballistic testing facilities. That now dubious honor goes to H.P. White Laboratory, Inc., a civilian test facility. Interestingly, a number of professionals in the ballistic armor field that we’ve spoken with do not trust H.P. White Laboratory to conduct fair ballistic testing of their products, as they believe H.P. White to be biased towards U.S. Army Natick Soldier Center/Soldier Systems Center (Natick) and PEO Soldier. In fact, H.P. White is so preferred by these two organizations that General James R. Moran (James R. Moran) would reportedly only agree to test Dragon Skin/SOV body armor at this facility. Hmh.
Natick and PEO have basically declared war on Pinnacle Armor and Dragon Skin. It’s DefRev’s opinion that what we’re all seeing here is an economic and political fight, a high-stakes turf war, if you will. It would appear that U.S. Army Natick and PEO are actively protecting their Interceptor body armor program and preferred contractors (soft armor and ceramic hard armor components), and blocking Dragon Skin from being adopted/procured, even though (we believe) these organizations are already aware that Dragon Skin is superior to Interceptor, with Dragon Skin offering superior ballistic protection to Interceptor in terms of coverage area at the same weight, multi-hit capability, threat level protection, and durability.
If we’re right, these organizations (U.S. Army Natick and PEO Soldier) are working against the best interest of our infantry warfighters, because they’re keeping them from receiving the best ballistic protection that’s currently available--technology that could better protect them from enemy ballistic threats. And, the worst part is, they’re doing this during wartime. If we’re correct in our assessment, then the actions we’ve described could actually rise to the level of treason. We don’t use the “T” word lightly. The actions that have been taken so far by certain individuals are potentially criminal and thus prosecutable acts. Our warfighters’ lives are at stake (again, during wartime). Remember, our infantry warfighters are currently suffering approx. 95% of all combat casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan (and anywhere else in the world, for that matter), so they deserve the best weapons and ballistic protection they can get. In our opinion, as well as the opinions of a number of military and PSC/PMC professionals we’ve spoken with, Interceptor simply ain’t it, and SOV/Dragon Skin is (the best existing body armor for anti-rifle protection).
Murray Neal, Pinnacle’s CEO, recently told DefenseReview that "Pinnacle Armor has a standing invitation for the U.S. Army to do a side-by-side [live-fire test of Dragon Skin body armor vs. Interceptor body armor], that when the smoke clears, that the Army agrees that whatever's left standing without holes in it gets outfitted to the Army soldiers [immediately]--and the Interceptor won't be that system . They can put the best Interceptor body armor they have, and we'll put ours [Dragon Skin] next to it...[reiterates challenge]". Mr. Neal added that information (written ballistic test data and video footage) to Pinnacle's level IV SOV/Dragon Skin would of course have to remain classified (as it is, currently). Pinnacle Armor's Level III/III+ Dragon Skin has not been classified by the U.S. military.
"If someone finds the holy grail we will be right there to back up the dump truck and buy it," Sorenson has said. Defense Review would like to believe him (for the sake of our troops).
However, as much as we’d like to see the U.S. Army take Pinnacle Armor up on Mr. Neal’s challenge (under fair and video-taped conditions, with Pinnacle Armor representatives and independent witnesses present), we’re guessing they won’t. It’s our belief that they can’t, because Dragon Skin will beat Interceptor hands down, and they know this. If this were to happen, it could potentially prove fatal to the Interceptor body armor program—and Natick and PEO won’t allow that to happen.
Murray Neal, CEO of Pinnacle Armor, has told us that both Level III/III+ and Level IV (classified) Dragon Skin have undergone testing at the U.S. Army Aberdeen Test Center (ATC) and Army Research Laboratory (ARL)--to Secretary of Defense Standards (military standards), no less--and passed those tests. This information would seem to be at direct odds the following statements made by Mr. Sorenson: "In some cases we haven't seen this capability ... has done anything to provide force protection we evaluate is even standard," and "all other claims being made (about Dragon Skin are) ... exactly what they are: claims." It’s our understanding that the DoD ballistic test standards mentioned above are more stringent than NIJ standards. In those tests (which did happen, by the way), Dragon Skin reportedly...
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
It's funny that their main source of information is, in fact, Pinnacle Armor itself. I would be much more interested if they had more credible sources...
Another factor, that may be coming into this is sheer cost. The army may not want to use the Dragon Skin simply because it is more expensive than the Interceptor Armor.