What it wasnt., page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 30-3-2006 @ 08:10 PM by Stateofgrace
As promised NIST NEVER stated the temperatures where any where near hot enough to melt steel.....

[Mod edit: to add source link and appropriate external source tags]


source:
Observations of paint cracking due to thermal expansion. Of the more than 170 areas examined on 16 perimeter column panels, only three columns had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250 ºC: east face, floor 98, inner web; east face, floor 92, inner web; and north face, floor 98, floor truss connector. Only two core column specimens had sufficient paint remaining to make such an analysis, and their temperatures did not reach 250 ºC. ... Using metallographic analysis, NIST determined that there was no evidence that any of the samples had reached temperatures above 600 ºC. (p 90/140)



source:
A floor section was modeled to investigate failure modes and sequences of failures under combined gravity and thermal loads. The floor section was heated to 700 ºC (with a linear thermal gradient through the slab thickness from 700 ºC to 300 ºC at the top surface of the slab) over a period of 30 min. Initially the thermal expansion of the floor pushed the columns outward, but with increased temperatures, the floor sagged and the columns were pulled inward. (p 98/148)



source:
A spray burner generating 1.9 MW or 3.4 MW of power was ignited in a 23 ft by 11.8 ft by 12.5 ft high compartment. The temperatures near the ceiling approached 900 ºC. (p 123/173)



source:
The jet fuel greatly accelerated the fire growth. Only about 60 percent of the combustible mass of the rubblized workstations was consumed. The near-ceiling temperatures varied between 800 ºC and 1,100 ºC. (p 125-6/175-6)



source:
Aside from isolated areas, perhaps protected by surviving gypsum walls, the cooler parts of this upper layer were at about 500 ºC, and in the vicinity of the active fires, the upper layer air temperatures reached 1,000 ºC. The aircraft fragments had broken through the core walls on the 94th through the 97th floors, and temperatures in the upper layers there were similar to those in the tenant spaces. (p 28/78)


FEMA echos them same, I'll find them later.

Mod Note: New External Source Tags – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 3/31/2006 by 12m8keall2c]


reply posted on 30-3-2006 @ 08:40 PM by Stateofgrace
9.1 seconds...freefall time.

WTC 1: tc = 13.48 s

WTC 2: tc = 12.07 s

www.911myths.com...

Here is a 32 page report calculating the collapse time of each tower against observed times, care to read it ? or would you prefer we looked at shakey videos with stop watchs?

[edit on 30-3-2006 by Stateofgrace]

[edit on 30-3-2006 by Stateofgrace]


reply posted on 31-3-2006 @ 01:44 AM by dirtyrat5000
this is a sight i just found www.civil.usyd.edu.au... its got a little diagram and stuff saying why they fell. thats good enough for me.

seriously though who cares why they fell. the fact is that they did fall, people died, people went to war, more people died, during the time between when they fell and now morons on the internet argue over why they fell when they have no idea.

[edit on 31-3-2006 by dirtyrat5000]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 9 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 1 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 12 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 5 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 16 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags