It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by carlwfbird
This is screaming "April Fools" to me.
Originally posted by UnMature
Actually both Churchill and Stalin were notified about the tests.
Originally posted by DYepes
I think it makes for one hell of a show, and I would most definetly go to see it as an annual event
Originally posted by Simon_Boudreaux
1.So what kind of power are we talking here?700 tons?
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Originally posted by Simon_Boudreaux
1.So what kind of power are we talking here?700 tons?
700 tons equals (.7 KT) Tiny if it was nuke.
Little Boy, the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, Japan on August 6, 1945. = (13 KT) or 13,000 tons of TNT
Tsar Bomba 1961 Russia = (50 MT) 50,000,000 tons of TNT
Theres been larger man made non nuclear explosions
Seymour Narrows, British Columbia 1958. 1,375 tons of chemical explosives so that was (1.375 kilotons)
Mount St. Helen came in at (24MT) 24,000,000 tons of TNT
Originally posted by The Vagabond
IF it is NOT 700 tons, (but still gives the big mushroom cloud, etc) THEN it's probably nuclear or something else exotic.
Originally posted by Bhadhidar
1.4 million tons of explosive!?
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Originally posted by Bhadhidar
1.4 million tons of explosive!?
Not 1.4 million tons that would be (1.4 MT) thats huge. I think you meant pounds maybe?
Its (.7KT) 700 tons
If it was antimatter it would have to be only a small fraction of a ounce of the stuff. 1 ounce would equal 1.22 (MT) thousands of times more powerful then this bomb in question.
[edit on 31-3-2006 by ShadowXIX]
”We have several very large penetrators we’re developing,” he told defense reporters.
”We also have — are you ready for this — a 700-ton explosively formed charge that we’re going to be putting in a tunnel in Nevada,” he said.
”And that represents to U.S. the largest single explosive that we could imagine doing conventionally to solve that problem,” he said.
The aim is to measure the effect of the blast on hard granite structures, he said.
”If you want to model these weapons, you want to know from a modeling point of view what is the ideal best condition you could ever set up in a conventional weapon — what’s the best you can do.