Are 767's wingtips and tail made of Pentanium Steel?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 30-3-2006 @ 01:55 AM by Killtown
Notice that in both of the "Wile E. Coyote" impact holes in the WTC Towers, they show where it looks as if the 767's wingtips and tip of the vertical stabilizer tail sliced relatively cleanly through the facade:


WTC 1 impact hole:





(Flight 11 allegedly crashed into it going 470 mph.)



WTC 2 impact hole:





(Flight 175 allegedly crashed into it going 590 mph.)



The video of the 2nd crashes shows the ENTIRE planes passing through the building:





The photos of the 1st crash suggests that it did to.




QUESTION:

Do you think the wingtips and tail section of the Boeing 767's that supposedly crashed through the WTC 1 & 2 are strong enough to cut through the steel reinforced skyscrapers like a knife going through warm butter?



For that to happen, the fragile and mostly hollow wings and tail would have to SAW there way through each of the spaced steel girders of the buildings:





The spaced steel girders of the buildings should have acted like an egg slicer to anything coming into it:





The wings and tail also get weaker towards their tips and note that the angle the swept back wings and tail crashed at, the wings and tail would have had to contact the "sharp" corners of each of the many steel girders it would have had to saw through first. And not only that, the wings and tails would have had to slice through the floor slabs too, the sturdiest part of the facade. Also, Flight 11 reportedly was traveling 120 mph slower than Flight 175.



Now, notice what happens when a plane's wing comes in contact with a bird:








Remember, the question is can the wingtips and tail do what they supposedly did to the Twin Towers, not what caused the impact holes if the planes didn't.




Also, note that the angle of both impacts are nearly identical:




And both "planes" make a direct hit without any of its wings extending beyond the corners of the buildings. If that happened, the part that extended beyond the buildings would have sheered off and continued to travel forward and would be seem in the videos that would prove they were real planes.




(For those who don't know what Pentanium Steel is, see here.)

[edit on 30-3-2006 by Killtown]


reply posted on 1-4-2006 @ 12:18 AM by promomag
Maybe it means something... why don't you take a little read here:

www.davesweb.cnchost.com...

I promise you.... it's a good read..... perhaps we can have a conversation about it afterwords.

Originally posted by Zaphod58
And 5 light poles means what? That the 250 pound poles are going to drag the almost 200,000 pound plane off course?

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 15 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 9 days ago with 13 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 16 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Remains of 9/11 victim identified
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags