It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Next President?

page: 1
0
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 29 2006 @ 05:09 PM
link   
Is it possible that in the next election that the American people will be able to vote in someone with an ounce of intelligence and common sense, please!!! Becasue you as a people are alrite but the average muslim measures you next to your leader as does the rest of the world. I don´t need to tell you what the world thinks of you right now with Mr Bush in charge. I assume Clinton will run for the democrats, who will for the Republicans. Also will they be able to pull America out of the mess your in, and get back to the diplomacy that kept the world from a global war for the last 60 years?




posted on Mar, 29 2006 @ 05:21 PM
link   
America is stronger and better under Bush. I fully expect the American people will elect another strong leader like Bush. Electing another weak democrat, like Bill Clinton, brings on another 9/11 like attack, and we definately don't want that.



posted on Mar, 29 2006 @ 05:23 PM
link   
more than likely not (I live in the USA) it will just wind up as a ringaround in the long run.
As for bush being strong:
ahhahaahahhahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaahaahahahhahahahahahaahahahahahha!!!
I know what I just said (ahaha) will cause bu#es to flip out but I cincerely hope no one like bush EVER takes control again, or anyone who has beliefs like him. Also for the bu#es: Your "leader" is not "strong", its the ones who pull his strings that make him "strong" in your eyes.



posted on Mar, 29 2006 @ 05:25 PM
link   
America is at it´s weakest and most vulnerable for some time. Although Clinton didn´t píck up on Osama it´s not like Bush and his team didn´t have enough warnings. You confuse strong with stupid. Strong is coming up with a viable plan that will keep america united and not turn the world against it, not invading countries based on lies and counterlies.



posted on Mar, 29 2006 @ 05:29 PM
link   
I resisted the temptation to mock him Vekar, thankyou for writing what i was thinking!"



posted on Mar, 29 2006 @ 05:35 PM
link   
This is great, we got a Peruvian and an equivilent of a 12 yr old thinking they know what is best for the US. Real nice.

Democrats are weak and raise taxes, Republicans are strong and lower taxes. When you put it on the most simple terms, Republicans will stay in leadership for a long time.

When the Democrats best are ALGORE, John Kerry, and Hillary, they will remain a weak party.



posted on Mar, 29 2006 @ 05:44 PM
link   


America is stronger and better under Bush. I fully expect the American people will elect another strong leader like Bush. Electing another weak democrat, like Bill Clinton, brings on another 9/11 like attack, and we definately don't want that.


That's a good one. I fell right off my chair. GWB is about as smart as Dan Quayle. Bush is not strong and he is not a leader. Bill Clinton was weak? Really? I'll take a weak guy like Clinton who balanced the budget over a moron like GWB who has us how many trillions in debt right now? And what countries are we in debt to? How big is that list now?

Clinton had nothing to do with 9/11 and that statement is absurd. Why don't you do some research instead of being a Republican zombie? The Bush's and the Bin Ladens were in business together before 9/11 and still are. GWB probably wanted the 9/11 attack to happen so he could come in and play savior. He and his family probably paid Bin Laden and his people to do it.



posted on Mar, 29 2006 @ 05:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Peruvianmonk
Although Clinton didn´t píck up on Osama it´s not like Bush and his team didn´t have enough warnings.


Actually thats not true, Clinton warned Bush about Osama, told Bush that Saddam was not a threat but Osama was, and had unmanned aerial vehicles tracking Osama for months, this survelliance was suspended by Bush right after taking office.

Will the Americans elect a real intelligent leader? You have a false faith in the American Democracy, votes don't count, aren't being counted, hacking and cheating is occuring, actually always has, only now its even more sneaky and dangerous. Democracy in America, and you might say the rest of the world to follow its corruption, is dead. In fact in the State of Virginia the FBI has been told that people who talk about civil liberties and the Constituition the United States of America are now considered terrorists.

Corporations run our government, not the people.
One Nation Under Survelliance, with Debt, Suspicion, and Poison for all.



posted on Mar, 29 2006 @ 05:50 PM
link   


Is it possible that in the next election that the American people will be able to vote in someone with an ounce of intelligence and common sense, please!!! Becasue you as a people are alrite but the average muslim measures you next to your leader as does the rest of the world. I don´t need to tell you what the world thinks of you right now with Mr Bush in charge. I assume Clinton will run for the democrats, who will for the Republicans. Also will they be able to pull America out of the mess your in, and get back to the diplomacy that kept the world from a global war for the last 60 years?


And who are you monk? Where are you from? Who is your leader? You want to throw rocks at me and my country, better be wearing a helmet!

What is an "average muslim?" Is he/she a car bomber? A head lopper? A kidnapper? A terrorist? A Christian hater? A suicide bomber? Seriously...what is an "average muslim?"



posted on Mar, 29 2006 @ 05:54 PM
link   


Corporations run our government, not the people.


Exactly! You can't have most of the money in the hands of a few and have a democracy at the same time. Democracy is a distant memory.......

Kennedy was a rarity, a true Democrat....and look where that got him. Now we have puppets. Some are bad and some are worse!



posted on Mar, 30 2006 @ 10:29 PM
link   
Exitable boy,

Check out Senator John Edwards from North Carolina. He has integrity, his own money, blue-collar Southern roots, common sense, law degree, nice-looking, acceptable wife, etc. If only he were brave enough to say what is really on his mind. To do that would ruin his political career forever. Unfortunately, even if he does make it to the forefront, the system is set up to quickly dispatch a man like Edwards. I guess Hillary will win unless they can conjour up a scandal on her.

I enjoy your politics and agree with you on many issues.

hh313



posted on Mar, 30 2006 @ 10:39 PM
link   
Bush a strong and good leader???



posted on Mar, 31 2006 @ 08:42 AM
link   


I guess Hillary will win unless they can conjour up a scandal on her.

I enjoy your politics and agree with you on many issues.


I don't think Hillary has a chance to be president. I honestly don't think the country is ready for a woman president. I'm not saying that out of prejudice....just reality. I don't care if a president is male or female. I'd just like one that is not a dicatator, not afraid to have their own ideas and is willing to attempt to make this country a democracy again.

I think Edwards is a good man also. I also like Joe Biden. I think they have a much better chance than Hillary.



Democrats are weak and raise taxes, Republicans are strong and lower taxes. When you put it on the most simple terms, Republicans will stay in leadership for a long time.


Car salesman...this is funny stuff. Replicans lower taxes for the rich (which helps themselves by the way)....what taxes have they lowered for the middle class and the poor? What were we paying for gas when Clinton was in office? What are we paying now? Did Clinton start a phony war (a new Vietnam) that got thousands of Americans killed and will get more killed for no reason?

GWB is a straw man just like his father and, again, dumb as a stump just like Dan Quayle. Reagan was a good president. Other than that, what other republican has done anything for this country in the last 100 years? I'll tell you...NONE!!

History:

GWB - sucks: REPUBLICAN
Clinton - Did a fantastic job including balancing the budget: DEMOCRAT
Bush Sr. - horrible president...totally out of his league and over his head: REPUBLICAN
Reagan - good president...strong leader: REPUBLICAN
Carter - not so good, but was truly responsible for getting the hostages freed and Reagan got credit for it....and today is one of the smartest democrats on the planet: DEMOCRAT
Ford - LMAO....a joke from day one...got the job because he was a Nixon crony and Nixon gave him the job as a thank you for his help with the bogus Warren Commission report: REPUBLICAN
Nixon - scumbag...liar, thief and involved in the Kennedy assassination; REPUBLICAN
Kennedy - great man, had his own mind and a true believer in Democracy: DEMOCRAT
Eisenhower - horrible president: REPUBLICAN
Truman - good president, tough man, man of the people: DEMOCRAT
FDR - great president, great man, got us out of the depression and put a lot of great policies into affect to help the American people: DEMOCRAT

Shall I continue? That's 6 republicans since FDR and 5 democrats. 5 out of 6 bad republicans and 4 out of 5 good democrats. Which party has been doing a better job?

Car salesman....go sell some cars and rip off as many of your fellow Americans as possible like a good republican would!

[edit on 31-3-2006 by Excitable_Boy]



posted on Mar, 31 2006 @ 09:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by Peruvianmonk
America is at it´s weakest and most vulnerable for some time. Although Clinton didn´t píck up on Osama it´s not like Bush and his team didn´t have enough warnings. You confuse strong with stupid. Strong is coming up with a viable plan that will keep america united and not turn the world against it, not invading countries based on lies and counterlies.


So sending in a bunch of cruise missile to blow up a pharmicutical plant in Sudan was done with solid intelligence by Clinton> hahahahahahahahahahahahah

Deny Ignorance Deny the Clintonites

[edit on 31/3/06 by OneGodJesus]



posted on Mar, 31 2006 @ 09:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by Excitable_Boy
1) I'll take a weak guy like Clinton who balanced the budget over a moron like GWB who has us how many trillions in debt right now? And what countries are we in debt to? How big is that list now? Clinton had nothing to do with 9/11 and that statement is absurd.

2) The Bush's and the Bin Ladens were in business together before 9/11 and still are. GWB probably wanted the 9/11 attack to happen so he could come in and play savior. He and his family probably paid Bin Laden and his people to do it.


1) Our system of economy is based on debt. It makes our money real. The more debt there is the more our money is worth or at least the more can be put into circulation. You need to do your research. There is a book called "The creature from Jeckle island". It talks about the Federal Reserve system and how it is all smoke and mirrors. His sources are solid and his argument is likewise. Just because someone "balances" the budget that doesn't mean we a re a stronger nation economically. It isn't like your checkbook, pal. It is entirely beyond your understanding apparently with statements like this. As to Clinton not having anything to do with OBL, think again. He knew as much as Bush did as President and did nothing to stop it either or the first attack on the towers. So who's to blame? Neither President. The intelligence agencies and bankers, that's who/ The intel guys get bad info or erroneous info and pass it as solid. The bankers get to fund the good guys and bad guys and make off with a king's ransom. Blame them.

2) Where is the beef? No links, no ref books, no history, no brains.



[edit on 31/3/06 by OneGodJesus]



posted on Mar, 31 2006 @ 09:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Excitable_Boy
1) Car salesman...this is funny stuff. Replicans lower taxes for the rich (which helps themselves by the way)....what taxes have they lowered for the middle class and the poor? What were we paying for gas when Clinton was in office? What are we paying now? Did Clinton start a phony war (a new Vietnam) that got thousands of Americans killed and will get more killed for no reason?

2) GWB is a straw man just like his father and, again, dumb as a stump just like Dan Quayle. Reagan was a good president. Other than that, what other republican has done anything for this country in the last 100 years? I'll tell you...NONE!!

3) History:

GWB - sucks: REPUBLICAN
Clinton - Did a fantastic job including balancing the budget: DEMOCRAT
Bush Sr. - horrible president...totally out of his league and over his head: REPUBLICAN
Reagan - good president...strong leader: REPUBLICAN
Carter - not so good, but was truly responsible for getting the hostages freed and Reagan got credit for it....and today is one of the smartest democrats on the planet: DEMOCRAT
Ford - LMAO....a joke from day one...got the job because he was a Nixon crony and Nixon gave him the job as a thank you for his help with the bogus Warren Commission report: REPUBLICAN
Nixon - scumbag...liar, thief and involved in the Kennedy assassination; REPUBLICAN
Kennedy - great man, had his own mind and a true believer in Democracy: DEMOCRAT
Eisenhower - horrible president: REPUBLICAN
Truman - good president, tough man, man of the people: DEMOCRAT
FDR - great president, great man, got us out of the depression and put a lot of great policies into affect to help the American people: DEMOCRAT

[edit on 31-3-2006 by Excitable_Boy]


1) Who do you think employs the population goofie? You people crack me up. Socialists! Everything will be alright if no one is rich, riiiiiiiiight.


2) You said above in your post that Reagan was a good preident. Can't have it both ways goof.

3) Here are some facts to chew on.

www.kriegbooks.com...

www.newsmax.com...

www.newsmax.com...

www.mikenew.com...

www.greaterthings.com...



posted on Mar, 31 2006 @ 09:31 AM
link   
Hi Exitable Boy,

You left out Johnson who was responsible for driving home the legislation on the voting rights act and civil rights act. Just another example of a Democrat that made a difference in our lives and improved the human condition.

Clinton's character weakness was exploited by the Republicans and unfortunately, he was frightened when he got caught. He should have told the whole world these few words put simply "I will not discuss my sex life with you or anyone just as I will not tell you of my other bodily functions" and he would have been home free. The Republicans are slick as hell. They know how to assassinate your character. They find your weak spot and go for blood. Democrats aren't that vicious although many are very sexy which really pisses off the Republicans. Ha, it's very funny if it wasn't so sad.

hh313



posted on Mar, 31 2006 @ 10:16 AM
link   
Bleh....

Democrats = Commies
Republicans = Nazis

I'll probably be voting for some guy that no one's ever heard of.



posted on Mar, 31 2006 @ 10:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kruel
Bleh....

Democrats = Commies
Republicans = Nazis

I'll probably be voting for some guy that no one's ever heard of.


Yup me too. I know I'll catch flak for this but I voted for Perot. I liked how he was in your face to both bush and clinton at the debates. He has my respect as a self made man, a person of principal in the face of adversity (the time he hired merc's to get his employees out of kidnappers hands when the state department was sitting on theirs) and a person of conviction. He may have dropped out of the race but it was to protect his family from the media hounds.



posted on Mar, 31 2006 @ 01:37 PM
link   
Perot, what a joke. His choice for VP was indicative of his intelligence. What a blundering fool. He didn't have a lick of sense. What makes people think that our government is or should be run like a corporation? A corporation is a cold-hearted bastard like Bush and Perot. A government by and for the people is completely different. How long before people wake up and smell the corporate crap flowing out of the White House?

The problem with not joining either the Democratic party or Republican party is that everybody else is voting either Democrat or Republican so all you independent's votes go down the toilet. But hey, I guess you babies feel good cause mommy and daddy let you vote the way you want to (even though you should have stayed on the playground). Just who in the world told you young Einsteins that voting Independent for Ross Perot or Ralph Nader would be efficacious? That's why the Democrats lost the last election because you morons wanted to go on a "shopping trip" for a president. Election time, you have to take what is offered on your plate and make a choice that means something. Don't just make some sort of "statement" trying to reflect your brilliant political mind and stand. We all knew the choices were limited, but by God, next time make your vote count, or don't bother to vote at all! Voting for Perot or Ralph Nader! Ha! Just thinking that some idiot would do that makes my blood boil. Why??, because it meant we have that bloodthirsty, oil-thirsty, moron idiot Bush in the White House who will probably get us all killed. My God, no wonder our country is in the ditch!



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join