It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


WTC Collapses and Madrid Tower does not

page: 1

log in


posted on Mar, 28 2006 @ 11:21 AM
If this has already been discussed, please close this thread out. But after spending a few minutes searching I could not find anything.

Now we all know the story of the collapse of WTC, they burned for a very short period of time and then folded in on itself at free falling speeds. North, South and #7 all looked like they were planned collapses but we always had that hope that no way would our government plan such devastation.

But after watching the fire on the Madrid tower, which burned like an inferno all night and consuming most of the buidling, did not crumble.

Now how can the WTC which was build to be much stronger, fold up so easily from a fire that was very restricted to a portion of the building.. when a smaller and weaker building that is completely consumed by fire, withstand the fire for the duration of the whole night.

WTC burning..


WTC aftermath...

Madrid aftermath..

Now you be the judge.

We all know the details, the fire was restricted. It burned for a very short time, how does a building of such magnitude completely collapse at free falling speed? The government has had cop outs for all of these questions.

Well what we can say about this one.

posted on Mar, 28 2006 @ 12:22 PM
The search function here is not that great.

It has been discussed a number of times.

Maybe this will help you understand how the Windsor Tower performed in comparison to the WTC towers. (Hint: they were built with different strucutral designs and different building materials)


log in