It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by resistor
Originally posted by Ford Farmer
Originally posted by Graystar
As for me I don't care one way or the other who out there is homosexual, unless you are wearing a christian mask.
[edit on 5-11-2006 by Graystar]
There is no mask.
No Kidding!!
I think you're secretly hiding behind the flag and the Rocky Horror references.
You must be an illuminati plant, here to subvert us with your pro gay agenda.
Originally posted by an3rkist
Stating that any person needs to "repent" for who they are is so typical Christian and so incredibly inhumane it makes me sick...you Christians are trying to deny people their civil rights and you make me sick to my stomach.
Originally posted by Essedarius
please use the person's name when you are talking about their beliefs...don't throw all Christians into the mix.
I know it seems to be a common theme among Christians...but keep in mind that not all Christians are haters.
Take for example: Jesus.
Originally posted by an3rkist
Personally I don't think Jesus is a great example, but that's just me. Jesus himself said something that is along the same lines as these Christians saying the homosexuals need to repent when he said, "Father forgive them for they know not what they do." ... People should not be in need of forgiveness for being their true selves.
Originally posted by denythestatusquo
I think you want what you want as an example of flexing your muscles to show your new found power and I can't see the real need for much of what you want.
Originally posted by Essedarius
White People: Redneck bigots.
Black People: Gang members.
Latinos: Lazy.
Gay People: Pedophiles.
Originally posted by southern_cross3
Do you feel it's intolerant to have an aversion to child molesters? Homosexuality and child molestation are both perversions and are comparable to one another for sheer wrongness.
Clearly, Christ felt no need to mention homosexuality in the New Testament because it was an unspeakable sin -- those writing the books of the New Testament accepted it as true and didn't see it as being up for discussion. Never would they have even questioned it; many would not have imagined it.
Originally posted by southern_cross3
I would be interested in hearing arguments from true Christians in favor of the morality of homosexuality. TRUE Christians. Not "I believe the Bible is a good book fabricated by good men, or altered at some time in its history." Not "I go to Church but I believe many parts of the Bible are not applicable to us today." And not "I believe that half of the Bible doesn't apply to modern Christians."
Originally posted by southern_cross3
I have a feeling that few molested children actually say "no".
If you want to validate the morality of homosexuality through secular means, then by all means try. But don't corrupt the Word of God to support a sin.
It is mentioned earlier in the chapter that God intends to destroy the city specifically due to the sin of the men of the city. We see in this passage the men of the city, who clearly wish to engage in homosexual relations with Lot's male "angel in disguise" visitors. The verb "know" in this case means "to have intercourse with", and any modern translation of the Scriptures will make it clear that the men did not wish to merely talk to them, they wished to have sex with them. Lot refers to this specifically as being wicked. The angels then rescue Lot's family from the evil city before it is destroyed by God for its sins. Not necessarily only due to homosexuality, but this was certainly part of it.
1. dealings or communication between individuals, groups, countries, etc.
2. interchange of thoughts, feelings, etc.
Originally posted by southern_cross3
I would be interested in hearing arguments from true Christians...Not "I go to Church but I believe many parts of the Bible are not applicable to us today."
The Book of Leviticus lays out the laws of the Israelites. Expressly the Israelites. I don't say that nothing in it can be applied to us today; however much of it is relevant only to Jewish practices,
However, not all of the Old Testament was "for the Jews".
In no way did I even remotely insinuate that victims of child molestation are wrong.
Being as the entire argument I have presented so far is based solely on the Word of God, if you do not believe it to be as such, then in your mind I haven't made an argument at all.
Pointless.