It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by apc
I am investigating the viability of alternatives to grid energy in the event of collapse. Primarily different ways of keeping car batteries charged, as these would be readily available in such a situation.
Solar is obviously the simplest, however it has a high initial cost and low gain.
I have concluded the most practical outlet (har) is bicycle driven generators.
This leads to two routes: DC motors and automobile alternators.
Alternators have the advantage of, typically, having voltage regulators built in. If driven at a high enough RPM, a bicycle could keep a car battery charged fairly efficiently. This also carries the advantage of availability, as with the batteries themselves.
DC motors however require additional regulation and circuit protection. A diode must be used to keep the target battery from turning the motor. Unregulated, a DC motor can output hundreds of volts, which can also be quite useful. Many 110VAC devices will run perfectly fine off DC.
So I remain undecided as to which avenue to pursue. I seek any input on the matter as well as any conclusions others have come to with their own investigations into the practicality of human powered generators.
Originally posted by apc
Pepsi78: I am interested in sources of power in the event that those nuclear power plants are not reliable. Having either been shut down, destroyed, or any other possible situation where grid power is unavailable.
10-micron-diameter-wide channels
two-centimetre wide glass disc cut by 480,000 holes