It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by whyfish
Hmm I'm just thinking aloud mainly, it just seems to me that about 400 years ago people would be hung for Homosexuality, nowdays its becoming more of the norm. Whos to say in 50 years time people will be lobbying to make paedophilia legal?
Originally posted by whyfish
Hmm I'm just thinking aloud mainly, it just seems to me that about 400 years ago people would be hung for Homosexuality, nowdays its becoming more of the norm.
Hmm I'm just thinking aloud mainly, it just seems to me that about 400 years ago people would be hung for Homosexuality, nowdays its becoming more of the norm. Whos to say in 50 years time people will be lobbying to make paedophilia legal? It just seems to me that morality is decreasing to me I'm not just talking about homosexuality either, the worlds failing, people with good intents do more and more damage everyday. And theres absolutely nothing I can do about it at the moment, hence I express my frustration about issues like this Sorry if anyone was offended.
Originally posted by iori_komei
Homosexuality and paedophilia are seperate things.
An interesting thing to cosider.
The ancient greek's accepted homosexuality, as was said above, in fact they did'nt have the concept of gay and straight, everyone was really bisexual.
Not only was homosexuality normal, but what we today would consider paedophilia was also normal, 13 year old boys would have partners twice there age or older, it was'nt seen as wrong, no one got hurt.
Originally posted by iori_komei
Why is'nt mankind worth saving?
I was only giving you all a little history lessen, I did'nt say I suported it, which I actually do, as long as all parties are in consent, but anyways I was just being teacherly.
Originally posted by Tyriffic
It is sort of funny how all the apologists for homosexuals just sprang out of the closet over this?!!
Does it touch a nerve that Thermopolis singled that fact out that a innocent child was subjected to a unnatural command by an adult to reckognize a woman as his "Daddy"???
Was it fair to the boy? No.
Was the woman insane....we do not know.
She is a murderer. Does it matter that she is gay and killed the child. Not really.
But the implication is that this LIFESTYLE does bring forth MANY MORE complications in relationships when children are involved.
I personally know a coulple who are lesbian where one has a son from a marriage to a man...yeesh.....have to actually clarify that...and this young man of 12 was teased to no end in school because he sat down to pee. When asked why he did this, he responded: " Because my other mommy pees that way."
Okay.....tell me it sooooooo healthy and NORMAL to subject children to this. And please do not give me the Black/White thing- I aint having it.
Originally posted by DevinS
WHich of course goes against the bible. Jesus CAME for a reason! To null the OT with the NT! Why us Christians can eat pork and shellfish while Jews can't. They follow OT rules, we follow NT rules, and the Gay quote they love to use so much is in the OT, not NT.
What I love is all these Christians quoting that line about laying down with another man blah blah blah but they never go about 4-8 sentences later when it tells you to stone children to death for saying no. How many of these people have stoned children to death for saying no? None? Then why are they picking the rules they want to follow? Because they are hypocrits, and they mix and match OT with NT. It would be like an Arab going "Well I like the Men are Rulers over WOmen in the Koran, but I don't like this part, so I am going to follow that part in the NT instead."
Originally posted by gekko
quote: Originally posted by gekko
So Tyriffic, you didn't answer any of my points. Funny, I had the feeling you wouldn't.
PS. No, I am not , I´m , but I wouldn't be ashamed if I were. Nothing wrong with a bit of nes.
Bye.
Okay Gekko. For one, you fell into my trap by assigning meaning to a smiley face winking...lol...
...two, you made no points. You just asked questions concerning MY points and not in erudite fashion [...]
[...] a second "mommy" is THE PROBLEM HERE. The young man was confused as to his nature [...]
[...] once puberty onset these issues came about because his second "mommy" was his role model for certain behaivours that are learned by children.
I hope I addressed one of your flippant questions?!
answers.com
flip·pant (flĭp'ənt) pronunciation
adj.
1. Marked by disrespectful levity or casualness; pert.
2. Archaic. Talkative; voluble.
Also, maybe you can provide some statistical evidence on homosexuals and child bearing for me?
Originally posted by gekko
Please explain. Can you provide statistics showing that many lesbians demand their stepchildren call them daddy? Statistics of gay guys demanding to be called mommy will do if you cant find anything on the lesbians.
Women who work to make boys like girls are wrong.
All toilets do not have walls my limited friend. And boys and girls will make fun.....
Family is a Man and a Woman with Children. As from the START. You can deviate from that all you care to, only God really cares.
Originally posted by DevinS
What's sad is most Bible Thumpers don't read the bible! They just sit and wait for their priest to tell them what to believe. What I want to know is if that priest is having sex with your kid, or nun, or adult woman/man, how can you sit there and listen to them?
I love my Minister, he is so lax, and that is because he read the bible! He follows the NT, not OT, and realizes if God loves all, wouldn't he love love? Love between two consenting adults can't be wrong in the eyes of God for isn't He all about Love? Care? Being good people? Yet the Bible Thumpers are not being good people, just sheeple to stupidity. And he tells the rest of us to leave others alone, if they are Jewish, Hindu, Buddist, WItches, whatever, as long as they are good people God will Love them. A lot different from these Bible Thumpers, and he's a Minister at my church for longer then I've been alive!
Don't forget, there are more pregnant nuns in the world then teenage girls after Prom Night! WHy? They don't have AIDS or STDs, official documents from the church state that, but they don't answer the main question, WHY Do Priests Need To Worry About WHo Has STDS!!!!! They aren't supposed to be having sex, yet they rape nuns, then force them to get abortions because they won't use condoms because using those are a sin!!!!! I don't know whether to laugh or be outraged at such stupidity!
So, One obviously insane woman kills a kid, millions of Priests have sex with children of both sex, adults of both sex, rape nuns, yet those evil gays need to be stopped...
Originally posted by Kacen
Originally posted by DevinS
WHich of course goes against the bible. Jesus CAME for a reason! To null the OT with the NT! Why us Christians can eat pork and shellfish while Jews can't. They follow OT rules, we follow NT rules, and the Gay quote they love to use so much is in the OT, not NT.
What I love is all these Christians quoting that line about laying down with another man blah blah blah but they never go about 4-8 sentences later when it tells you to stone children to death for saying no. How many of these people have stoned children to death for saying no? None? Then why are they picking the rules they want to follow? Because they are hypocrits, and they mix and match OT with NT. It would be like an Arab going "Well I like the Men are Rulers over WOmen in the Koran, but I don't like this part, so I am going to follow that part in the NT instead."
See, this is exactly what I've been trying to say all along! Yet no one listened to me...
Yet I've never heard what any of these Bible thumbers have had to say about this.
I hope I addressed one of your flippant questions?!
answers.com
flip·pant (flĭp'ənt) pronunciation
adj.
1. Marked by disrespectful levity or casualness; pert.
2. Archaic. Talkative; voluble.