Originally posted by ThePieMaN
he posts a message that we are gonna have a comet strike, but you have posted that he was totally wrong...Suppose we did get hit with a Comet and your
data was wrong and people had listened to you instead? Should you be held responsible legally for people listening to you?
The point is that it's crying wolf. If it happens enough people will eventually stop listening and caring, then when it does come to the point where
a comet will impact the Earth everyone would be so jaded that no one would believe the person saying to flee.
That being said, people are held accountable for actions made on false pretenses all the time. A cop shoots a kid because the kid pulls out a gun,
which ends up being a water gun. A leader goes to war looking for WMDs because people told him they would be there, only to find out they arn't.
Catch my drift? If I were wrong and people listening to me died because of it I would totally hold myself accountable.
The likewise should happen for these false panics/scares that go on.
The one thing I will agree on with that guy is that he deleted messages that debunked him. That was totally wrong and misleading to some people if
all they saw were other people that agreed with him.
Yeah, that is terrible wrong. It just goes to show that he was only pushing his agenda. If he wern't he would have left it open to criticism. Of
course, in reality, he knows he's theories don't hold water, so he had to bar those pointing that out from posting on his site.
Aside from deleting posts/threads and banning people, he also does what he can to discredit them by his own posts and comments in his "articles."
Like I've been saying, expect a book from this asshat about these events by the end of the year.
EDIT: Bad quotes! Bad!
[edit on 5/25/2006 by cmdrkeenkid]