It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
from here: www.abovetopsecret.com...
Reports of molten steel in the foundations of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers are frequently noted in literature of proponents of theories that the buildings were destroyed through controlled demolition. The most widely publicized report is one by American Free Press reporter Christopher Bollyn citing principals of two of the companies contracted to clean up Ground Zero. The president of Tully Construction of Flushing, NY, said he saw pools of "literally molten steel" at Ground Zero. Bollyn also cites Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, MD, as having seen molten steel in the bottoms of elevator shafts "three, four, and five weeks" after the attack.
Originally posted by ihatescifi
Thats footage of molten steal leaking from the tower that suggests -
a) The fires were hot enough to melt steal.
b) Thermite was used.
Both conclusions have a few holes, such as the thermite needing to be placed and the fires needing special conditions to get that hot.
Also note in this video:video.google.com... that the building buckes before and debris flies out. Which against supports it was either fires or thermit.
The temperature at the core of "the pile," is near 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, according to fire officials, who add that the fires are too deep for firefighters to get to.
Originally posted by Bikereddie
Interesting theories here.
I have one that has tormented me for a while.
If the fires were hot enough to melt steel which was encased in concrete and asbestos, then why were the fires not hot enough to melt the glass in the windows, all the office furniture, clothing from the people who were inside, even paper that was around the collapsed towers afterwards?
I'm not trying to debunk anyones theories here, but i am just at a loss to explain the above.