It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
but also it is my understanding in a Crisis that all T45 destroyers would be given the role of anti missile defense, even those in port can fire while docked. any missiles would surely pass close or over portsmouth naval base on its way to europe, from any rouge country in the middle east, thats the only direction a missile would come from.
What would the US have been doing while we were being destroyed? would they have nuked russia or would they have stood back and watched.
If the US wants to base its missiles here they will end of story. Why we dont go the whole hog and become the (is it) 51st state i don't know.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
but also it is my understanding in a Crisis that all T45 destroyers would be given the role of anti missile defense, even those in port can fire while docked. any missiles would surely pass close or over portsmouth naval base on its way to europe, from any rouge country in the middle east, thats the only direction a missile would come from.
Umm... even if a fully equipped Type 45 with Aster 30’s wanted to fire at an incoming ICBM it couldn't. It would be something to the kin of trying to shoot down an RPG with a bow and arrow. They are not designed for that role.
[edit on 25-3-2006 by WestPoint23]
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
The US has had some succesful interceptions at pearl harbor using this stuff, it isnt quite there but it is coming along nicely, hopefully we can have something deployable in 10 years.