I dunno what your problem is with the F22, (or me for that matter) but, I tell you what we saw and you tell me "no such place". I give you a link
(showing you you are wrong about that too) and you say it aint there, I show you it was there and you tell me it was only one plane...
...so it bugs me the data isnt telling the whole story. I wasn't trying to get into a debate on when the F22 got sent where, or how many. But, since
you question it, and the data is misleading, I went digging....
I asked a friend of mine at the base. (Even called up a couple buddies that were working that day - long distance, so, thanks for the bill) and
reaffirmed they saw same thing and they are sure it was F22's also, so, I ask a guy who is still at the base and he says for me to go here->
...supposedly one of the last websites to still hold any relevant data on the program.
You say the planes weren't even tested with radar guided missiles yet (SCROLL DOWN TO 1990) 11 years before 9/11 those planes were flown,
tested, and proven. WITH MISSILES. 13 planes in existence and operational delivered by 2002.
I'm also informed that the designation of military deployment has nothing to do with how many there are, where they are, or who's flying them.
You guys are looking at when the government recorded (or admits) they entered military service. What I gotta do, go get you the wingnut that was
flying the plane to take a lie detector test?
I'm done arguing with you about the planes. Your argument is based on spoon fed junk you got off the internet (or what you can still find) How
are you ever going to debunk a government conspiracy by ignoring first hand accounts of things that happened that day?
I asked a valid question. The response I get is a kanipshun fit about F22's and how I'm a liar and there's no such thing as F22's on 9/11.
You now have two links proving that wrong. Sorry fellas, but, while I'm roofing, I dont normally take a camera with me and as for "sticking to
roofing", haha, its a safer place to be than a jetliner on 9/11.
If you are not intending to shoot down a jetliner, why scramble fighter jets?
I also noticed, reading back thru some of this stuff here on this thread that somebody mentioned a c130, a white unmarked jet, and I've heard
other accounts of fighters being seen over New York that day, so, who said anything about planes being grounded applying to military aircraft? What I
said was "F22's were not the only planes in the air that day when everything was supposed to be grounded". I don't make the rules babe, I just
drive the nails.
as for the forum mods, wanting to axe my post... I see its forum policy to pick sides. Quite okay to flame me, but, when you get it back, I get
the axe. nice job fellas. Last post I'm going to bother with here. Your forum credibility just dropped to "less than classified"
F22's are stand off fighters and by 9/11 in 2001 they were definitely looking for a chance to demonstrate that capability. Makes me wonder about
93. Nobody saw the shot. Just a thought.
and for the guy that claims NORAD had no orders to stand down, Norad was under Cheney and was in fact ordered to stand down.
...but, I'm not the only "roofer" that knows this either... Funny thing about us "roofers"... we spend alot of time looking at airplanes,
helicopters, birds, and an occasional bumblebee.
F22's at Wright Pat in 2001 was a common sight. Don't know where you folks are from, but, the net is not your "end all be all" of sources.
People are. Everything is watched right now by DHS and the entire country is on edge.
They are putting us on a war footing like they did in WW1 and 2. Why do you think all the buyouts? Better wake up guys. Its not a "Conspiracy
theory" anymore. This is Risk "The Real Version". Welcome to WW3