It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by denythestatusquo
Interesting, and I'm not a Meier fan because he is known to have faked stuff in his zealotry but some very early pictures of his have been going around the web and they do not look easy to fake.
One picture had a saucer near a tall tree but at a fair distance from the ground, and the scale of everything indicates that the saucer was quite large. This picture was known from several decades before computer editing was possible. The likely expanation for debunkers would be a model but the scale involved would make it most difficult. The saucer did not appear in the foreground either in the picture.
Too bad I didn't keep the link. Will post it if I can remember. Either way, I still contend that some of Meier's material is legitimate and some of it is fake. The fact that some of it is fake is being used by the debunking crowd to explain away everything conveniently I believe.
Originally posted by jritzmann
Originally posted by denythestatusquo
Interesting, and I'm not a Meier fan because he is known to have faked stuff in his zealotry but some very early pictures of his have been going around the web and they do not look easy to fake.
One picture had a saucer near a tall tree but at a fair distance from the ground, and the scale of everything indicates that the saucer was quite large. This picture was known from several decades before computer editing was possible. The likely expanation for debunkers would be a model but the scale involved would make it most difficult. The saucer did not appear in the foreground either in the picture.
Too bad I didn't keep the link. Will post it if I can remember. Either way, I still contend that some of Meier's material is legitimate and some of it is fake. The fact that some of it is fake is being used by the debunking crowd to explain away everything conveniently I believe.
So ask yourself the hard question, IF some of it is real, then why would you contaminate such an event by faking pictures.
Nope, if you've faked shots, you just tossed the roll.
This is not "convenient" by any standard. If you do some looking into the camera used and forced perspective, used LONG before Meier, you'll know why that "ship" you refer to seems so "large".
You have to consider that pictures of his have not been debunked successfully too despite many people's assurances as such.