For a change?
I have yet to see a detailed analysis of how the buildings were rigged and what the sequence might have been.
Why don't we see at least one cohesive theory on how the demolition was accomplished and then we can pick it apart the way many of you imagine you
pick apart the NIST report.
Let's see if anyone can come up with positive evidence for demolition.
Why WTC 1 and 2 collapsed on their own taking WTC 7 without explosives, page 6
privacy
reply posted on 28-3-2006 @ 09:35 PM by pepsi78
What we never did is compare the 2 events.
Event 1... tower 1 and 2
Event 2 .. building 7
What I wana try is compare them not in the way they were constructed
but the way they went down.
The way they went down is a bit diferent.
At the twin towers we got this sort of fire works made out of dust and objects from the towers on the top where the top of the building falls out on the exterior but the other half from the bottom falls in like an implosion.
At building 7 it all falls in it's interior from top to bottom top included.
So to say, there is a diference betwen the twin towers and building 7.
Now if the shockwave did it I ask.
1 Why did it go from the top outwards(exterior) and not inside it's self like it supose to.
2 free fall of the bottom section means that it had to be from the foundation of the building.
Now there is a violent reaction up there, something had to add to the propultion so objects can obtain
an exterior tragectory.
Results of after shockwave does not do this, this can only be caused from explosives.
If it were the sockwave it would go down and nice with out the top of it going wild.
Like this one
I see no wild motion on top of building 7.
So either way fire and shockwaves do not justify what hapen with the twin towers.
There were explosives in the twin towers , no doubt.
Comparing the 2 events.
I say a big bomb went up there.
What ever hapened fire and shockwaves do not justify this.
[edit on 28-3-2006 by pepsi78]
Event 1... tower 1 and 2
Event 2 .. building 7
What I wana try is compare them not in the way they were constructed
but the way they went down.
The way they went down is a bit diferent.
At the twin towers we got this sort of fire works made out of dust and objects from the towers on the top where the top of the building falls out on the exterior but the other half from the bottom falls in like an implosion.
At building 7 it all falls in it's interior from top to bottom top included.
So to say, there is a diference betwen the twin towers and building 7.
Now if the shockwave did it I ask.
1 Why did it go from the top outwards(exterior) and not inside it's self like it supose to.
2 free fall of the bottom section means that it had to be from the foundation of the building.
Now there is a violent reaction up there, something had to add to the propultion so objects can obtain
an exterior tragectory.
Results of after shockwave does not do this, this can only be caused from explosives.
If it were the sockwave it would go down and nice with out the top of it going wild.
Like this one
I see no wild motion on top of building 7.
So either way fire and shockwaves do not justify what hapen with the twin towers.
There were explosives in the twin towers , no doubt.
Comparing the 2 events.
I say a big bomb went up there.
What ever hapened fire and shockwaves do not justify this.
[edit on 28-3-2006 by pepsi78]
An Overview and Debunking of the AE9/11T\'s List of Demolition Signs
Posted 17 days ago with 12 member flags
Posted 17 days ago with 12 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Final Decision: Court sanctions lawyers behind September 11 conspiracy case
Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.137 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.137 seconds
