It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
To:
Sen. Wayne Allard
March 18, 2006
Senator Allard,
We have been asked to sign a "Breach of Security Petition", sent to us by Jonathan Moseley, Exec. Director of the "U.S. Seaport Commission, PO Box 921, Frederick , MD 21705. The Petition states that the China Ocean Shipping Company (COSCO) and the Red Chinese have a base of operations at Pier J in Long Beach, CA. Cosco plans to operate modern "Tusunami Class" submarines, which can enter L.A. Harbor at Pier J and threaten the National Security of the U.S. The Petition demands that the 109th Congress pass Legislation to restore Pier J to U.S. control at once. Allowing the Red Chinese Army to operate at Pier J has breached the security of the USA.
We are VERY concerned about this. Why would China (COSCO) need submarines in their cargo fleet!!! Do they want to park them at pier J on America's own west coast!
Boulder , CO
Originally posted by Vitchilo
I think that those subs will already be near the coast so the missiles will be able to fly low
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Why going up high when you can stay low, under the radar signature?
Originally posted by Vitchilo
They are protecting themselves in case of an attack from the USA on their mainland. If the US attacks China, those sub will destroy as many cities as they are capable of. And all the star wars project will not be able to catch a lot of those missiles because I think that those subs will already be near the coast so the missiles will be able to fly low and the system will not be able to lock them...
Just my 2 cents.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
...................
Make sense? It can't "fly low" to its target. It would still have to go in a parabolic arc, no matter where it is launched from.
Originally posted by Muaddib
The Panama canal is owed by the Chinese and some U.S. ports are under control of the Chinese, which Clinton also hurried up to give to the CHinese before he left office.....
The Panama Canal is defined by law to be an inalienable patrimony of the Republic of Panama; it may therefore not be sold, assigned, mortgaged, or otherwise encumbered or transferred.
BTW Zaphod58, you really think that if the CCP wants to try to invade the U.S. they are going to go ask for permission? i think not.
China company grabs power over Panama Canal
By Rowan Scarborough
Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott recently wrote to Defense Secretary William S. Cohen that a Chinese shipping company is gaining broad authority over the Panama Canal and could deny passage to U.S. ships.
"It appears that we have given away the farm without a shot being fired," the Mississippi Republican said in the Aug. 1 letter requesting Mr. Cohen's security assessment.
It was the first time a congressional leader has raised questions about growing Chinese influence over one of the world's most strategic waterways. Until now, warnings were being raised primarily by a handful of conservative lawmakers, led by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, California Republican, who plans a fact-finding trip to Panama on Monday.
The focus of concern is Hutchinson Whampoa Ltd., a giant Hong Kong-based shipping firm with ties to China's leadership and its armed forces, the People's Liberation Army (PLA).
Under circumstances the U.S. Embassy in Panama called unusual, the government in 1997 awarded Hutchinson a 25- to 50-year contract to run the two major ports on the canal's Atlantic and Pacific entrances.
Moreover, conservatives assert that Panama gave Hutchinson broader powers in legislation known as "Law No. 5."
Port control
But more sinister to many Republican eyes is the fact that a Hong Kong company, Hutchison Whampoa, won the right to control a port facility at each end of the canal after a somewhat murky bidding process.
The Clinton administration denies that the firm has links to the Chinese government, but President Clinton did nothing to calm the controversy when he commented: "I think the Chinese will in fact be bending over backward to make sure they run it in a competent able and fair manner".
The State Department later stressed that Hutchison Whampoa will not in fact be "running" the canal, just two of its ports.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
And muaddib, have you ever actually LOOKED at the forces China could bring to bear? An invasion by them would last 2 days. They would have NO air support, NO ressuply, they would have to choose between armor and infantry, etc. It is not possible for China to sucessfully invade the US. The distances involved make it a joke logistically.