It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I.D This.

page: 1
0
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 05:55 PM
link   


the object in the center of the image caught my attention, it looks very clean and smooth. What you think it might be, it was quickly removed as it shows up in no other photos. Could this be the piece that was carried out under the blue tarp?




posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 07:28 PM
link   
That definitely could be a UAV, i'm searching around trying to find a match, it could be a model that is still secret or a specially made one for that mission. Lets hope a match is found though, that certainly looks like a UAV, nice find. It would also explain why the anti-missile defense system did not shoot it down.



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 07:30 PM
link   
Good luck with your search.



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 07:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by The Links








posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 08:04 PM
link   
Just a thought, but if a UAV carrying explosives did that amount of damage to a heavily reinforced building, do you really think there would be a huge chunk of it left unscratched at the impact point???

[edit on 18-3-2006 by Kung Foo Fighter]



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 08:08 PM
link   
It could have fired a bunker buster or something, if only we had the plans of the attack. What seems to be some type of side tail flap is very unique, it also appears to be rocket powered.

[edit on 18-3-2006 by NinjaCodeMonkey]



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 08:10 PM
link   
could not have explosives been planted in the retro fit waiting for the operation to happen too? Is that so inconceivable?

It is becoming more obvious that what struck the pentagon was not a passenger jet due to the very tight, difficult flight pattern, the very low and again difficult approach, the lack of damage and most of all the lack of wreckage.

Furthermore where are the bodies? An issue not mentioned much lately.



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 08:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kung Foo Fighter
Just a thought, but if a UAV carrying explosives did that amount of damage to a heavily reinforced building, do you really think there would be a huge chunk of it left unscratched at the impact point???

[edit on 18-3-2006 by Kung Foo Fighter]


That would depend on a number of assumptions i am not willing to take.



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 09:11 PM
link   
Film Fest

Where and when was this picture taken?



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 09:25 PM
link   
Can we see the other pics please so that we can compare too.



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 11:27 PM
link   
If we can get a source for this photo that would be very helpful.



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 11:37 PM
link   
Whoa - that's a very interesting picture


Regardless of what it actually is....lump of 757.....lump of drone.....looking forward to seeing this one getting picked apart!



posted on Mar, 19 2006 @ 12:45 AM
link   
If it was going to fire a missile or drop a bomb why crash it? If it was loaded with explosives then nothing would be left of it. UAVs are made of composites. They tend to end up in tiny little pieces when they crash, even more so if it was packed with an explosive.

It looks like part of a wing root, where it attaches to the fuselage actually.



posted on Mar, 19 2006 @ 02:56 AM
link   
With enhanced lighting and a touch of focus.

@ about 75% compression:


full resolution here

Section enhanced @ 200% actual size with 75% compression.


Interesting photo. Now, if someone could only provide a source, date, time etc.



posted on Mar, 19 2006 @ 05:14 AM
link   
source, date, time etc, i will have to get back to you on that, when i started saving images i never organised them in such a way that makes it easy for myself to find that information. It will come to me eventually.



posted on Mar, 19 2006 @ 05:35 AM
link   
That was not so hard after all.

Source : CPL JASON INGERSOLL, USMC
Date: September 11
Time: 09:30



posted on Mar, 19 2006 @ 05:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by The Links
Source : CPL JASON INGERSOLL, USMC
Date: September 11
Time: 09:30


Thanks. I found the original uncropped version.

Click on image for full size:
external image



posted on Mar, 19 2006 @ 05:50 AM
link   
Considering the location and it being post collapse, it would seem unlikely that it is part of any foreign object to the building.



posted on Mar, 19 2006 @ 05:52 AM
link   
It looks like either a wing root or a tail in the original. It's NOT the back end of a UAV like in one picture put up here. It's shaped totally differently. It comes to a sharper edge like the back of a wing or tail. It COULD be part of the building, but I personally think it's part of the plane.



posted on Mar, 19 2006 @ 06:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by 12m8keall2c

Originally posted by The Links
Source : CPL JASON INGERSOLL, USMC
Date: September 11
Time: 09:30


Thanks. I found the original uncropped version.

Click on image for full size:
external image






The original picture i have is a little clearer than the original you provide.

www.dodmedia.osd.mil...




top topics



 
0
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join