It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bush to Bush....to another Bush?

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 09:46 AM
link   
Im sure you all might have heard or thought of this. Is the younger bush going to run for his bothers spot when the time comes in 2008? I have heard alot of things about this....

When would we know who is running for the spot?




posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 09:56 AM
link   
Actually it'll be Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton-Bush....




posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 09:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by djohnsto77
Actually it'll be Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton-Bush....



Or bad times, good times, bad times, good times, bad times


[edit on 18-3-2006 by valkeryie]



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 10:17 AM
link   
If things go as planned, George W. Bush.



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 10:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by dgtempe
If things go as planned, George W. Bush.


I know it will devastate you dg, but mark January 20th, 2009 on your calendar. Bush will be gone noon that day.


[edit on 3/18/2006 by djohnsto77]



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 10:37 AM
link   
DJ,

I will light candles in anticipation to your great prophecy and his speedy exit from the White House.



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 10:58 AM
link   
So replacing one crime family with another is good for the people or country how?



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 11:44 AM
link   
I don't think we'll see Jeb Bush as President for at least another 4 years after the next election, so I'm going to agree with djohnsto pattern of Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton, Bush.



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 12:13 PM
link   
Actually the sequence is:

Bush - Clinton - Diebold - Diebold - Diebold - Diebold - ...



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 12:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gools
Actually the sequence is:

Bush - Clinton - Diebold - Diebold - Diebold - Diebold - ...

what in the world is Diebold? Im quick with most things but ...yea Im lost
Do you guys really think we will put another bush in the head seat again?
Or will it not be up to us?



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 12:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Britguy
So replacing one crime family with another is good for the people or country how?

I would like to see who is in the line up for the coming of age with the new war front. If not the Clintons then who. What would make up the right famliy? How can one tell who's good or bad in the eyes of the people?



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 12:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by CORF

Originally posted by Gools
Actually the sequence is:

Bush - Clinton - Diebold - Diebold - Diebold - Diebold - ...

what in the world is Diebold? Im quick with most things but ...yea Im lost
Do you guys really think we will put another bush in the head seat again?
Or will it not be up to us?


Diebold is an electronic pollbooth company who are supposedly Republican Supporters.

[edit on 18-3-2006 by sardion2000]



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 12:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by CORF

Originally posted by Gools
Actually the sequence is:

Bush - Clinton - Diebold - Diebold - Diebold - Diebold - ...

what in the world is Diebold? Im quick with most things but ...yea Im lost
Do you guys really think we will put another bush in the head seat again?
Or will it not be up to us?



I believe Diebold is the voting machine company.



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 12:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by CORF
what in the world is Diebold? Im quick with most things but ...yea Im lost
...
Or will it not be up to us?


Exactly it won't be up to you...

The Diebold Factor

The people behind this company and the other three who make electronic voting machines are more than just Republican supporters, some of them actually run the Republican Party.
.



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 01:06 PM
link   
Gools, surely you are not suggesting foul play


It's not the votes that count but the people (or machines) that count the votes



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 01:16 PM
link   
Ok I appologise to CORF if I've derailed his thread with my little joke (actually it would be funny if it wasn't true) so to get things back on track I'll ask why in the world would Americans accept yet another Bush family member? Even without Diebold being a factor.

Didn't Washington explicitely refuse a crown and the concept of monarchy? Are there no other good candidates among the almost 300,000,000 people of that country?

Why this desire for ruling family dynasties?

Carry on...
.



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 01:24 PM
link   
Another 4, or more, years of either a Bush or Clinton would be, quite frankly, nausiating (I know I didn't spell that one right
). I am to the point where I wish both families would just shut the hell up, and go the blank (insert explitive of your choice here) away. Quite frankly neither one was/or has been especially spectacular at their jobs, its just that the alternatives offered sucked even worse. Quite sad, actually.

It's time for a fresh face, or twelve, to take over. I got dibs on Sec.Def., or maybe VP, cool digs and no responsibility other than going to funerals.



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 01:26 PM
link   
I sincerely doubt Jeb Bush could ever become president...he has a lot of personal issues. I also doubt Hillary will ever get it either -- too much triangulation and personal issues as well.

If I had to bet now, I'd say McCain will be the next president.

[edit on 3/18/2006 by djohnsto77]



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 01:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by djohnsto77
I sincerely doubt Jeb Bush could ever become president...he has a lot of personal issues. I also doubt Hillary will ever get it either -- too much triangulation and personal issues as well.

If I had to bet now, I'd say McCain will be the next president.

[edit on 3/18/2006 by djohnsto77]

This i see happening more then the bush and clinton thing. It seems that i know a few people that thing McCain will do good... I dont know to much about him. Is he for the bush stuff or out with the rest ?



posted on Mar, 18 2006 @ 01:54 PM
link   
I think Bush-Clinton-Bush-Bush-Bush..........>>>>>>>>>>>>

Diabold may not even be needed again....



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join