Originally posted by markusjharper These white Jews like Rothschild (I'm white btw) are not a RACE, not a nation and that is my WHOLE
- There is no such thing as race
- The idea that nations should be defined by races is a throwback to the previous millenium, never supported by rational reasoning and correctly
Honestly, I could care less what color she is
Then stop asking her and anyone else. This is a discussion board about conspiracy, not about each other.
If someone comes on here and completely ignores the threat of the Rothschild Dynasty (maybe they never heard if him..lol) and then proceeds to nitpick
at everything into a flim-flam attempt to support Zionism; that is gonna get me going , sorry. Anyone, who has the gall to try and tell me that
Zionism is a great thing....honestly, I'm saying that these people are true scum
You are not permitted to personally attack other members here. Stop calling other members scum just because they've been able to desconstruct and
rip apart your "race theory" arguments.
I'm still waiting for someone to prove to me that the Rothschilds were not Masonic-Zionists.
No one is under any such obligation, and considering that you are blasting anyone that disagrees with you as 'scum', perhaps
even interested in proving any such thing to you.
Instead...of someone doing a simple search in www.google.ca
And again, you dodge and evade the question and show that you are incapable of demonstrating that the rothchilds are zionists or masons. This is the
primary reason why you are ignored by people and cannot carryon competent discussion with them here, because it is clear thatyou are not really
interested in having a discussion (and, agian, this is a discussion board
) and would probably be incapable of having any discussion even if you
were interested in doing so.
In 1776 Meyer Rothschild financed the Illuminati, a Masonic secret society that in turn spawned the major revolutions of the modern era
including the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917
What evidence supports the three claims made there, that the rothchilds suported the illuminati, that the illuminati are a masonic organization, and
that the illuminati inspired the bolsheviks.
The Rothschilds had played a major role in the Bavarian Illuminati, (25) and it is known that a least one of the sons of Amsel was a member.
Ok, lets look at a few things here so that we can all see some basic issues in research. Firstly, the way in which you are presenting this information
is as if you have written it, thats a nitpick, but some people would get confused over who is talking.
Secondly, there is a footnote there, note 25. A footnote is an indication that directs the reader to a citation, and that citation is for a work that
actually demonstrates the claim being made. Thus, one doesn't have to constantly demonstrate each claim while writting about it. Normally what one
would do is go to the reference cited, and check it, so see just how well the item was demonstrated. Here, on that webpage, there are no citations
provided. THe notation is there, but the citations aren't at the end of the page. THat is because the people maintaining the page are inept
are actually trying to hide their sources because they know that they are poor.
ALso, notice, the thing noted as having a citation, and thus implying that someone at least convinced the author of the work that it was true, is with
respect to the family being invovled with the illuminati, but then there is the further claim that Amsel Rothchild was an initiated member of the
fraternity, but no citation, so we can't even verify this otherwise bland statement.
After the Bavarian illuminati were exposed, the central occult power over the European secret societies shifted to Carbonarism
The Carbonari were around long after the illuminati, and, yes, they were a radical liberal organization, they were also hyper-religious. They were
one of the many secret socieities that were involved in the Risorgimento
The original author seems to be citing some sources, who knows what those sources are, there is alot of research into the carbonari and their rites
and documents and networks. However, the author seems to simply imply that there was, behind the illuminati and all these other secret socieities
throughout time, a behind the scenes controlling organization, that 'switched' its focus from the bavarian club to a neapolitan one, but, again,
notice, no footnote, no citation, apparently its just mere supposition. Thus, its a statement of theory
. Again, where is the evidence that
supports the theory
??? That is what was asked in the first place, and your response appears to literally benothing more than to present other
theories as a distraction.
Please demonstrate that the Rothchild family were zionists. Please demonstrate that they were in a masonic organization. Please demonstreate that
the people named in the orignal post held those degrees. You made specific claims, you have not provided specific evidence, you seem to merely be
ideas that you subjectively and personally find favourable. Apparently, it 'makes sense' in your worldview that these
people were evil zionist masons. Very well, but, again, what evidence
supports that?? By presenting evidence and things that the rest of us
can actually discuss and consider, you are able to communicate with people who do not a priori
already agree with you. THis is a basic
task in communicating with other people,why are you so unwilling to participate in even a basic level of discussion??