 |
|
Topic started on 17-3-2006 @ 04:06 AM by Merger
|
Not sure if this has been brought up before...so forgive me if I its a duplicate thread....
When i first arrived on this board and reading the motto 'Deny Ignorance', the first thought in my mind was 'errrr....what?'
My reaction because I was thinking in past tense terms...
Deny Ignorance if referring to yourself, and you are already ignorant....then you should deny it!....ie (im not ignorant!!!) even though you may
be....
Deny Ignorance if referring to someone else, and they are already ignorant...then you should deny it!...ie (You aren't ignorant) even though they may
be....
Then the future tense....
Deny Ignorance...if you see yourself becoming ignorant..then deny it from happening.....(which i think may be the actual meaning behind the motto of
ATS)
Deny Ignorance...if you see someone else becoming ignorant...then deny it from happening.... (ie, persuade them not to be ignorant on subjects
discussed).
So there are 4 meanings which I came across.... in 2 groups....past and future tense
Has anyone else thought about this?
So....what does 'Deny Ignorance' mean to you?
Kind Regards
Merger
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-3-2006 @ 04:14 AM by larry994
|
Originally posted by Merger
When i first arrived on this board and reading the motto 'Deny Ignorance', the first thought in my mind was 'errrr....what?'

You might want to check out this thread by SkepticOverlord
Deny Ignorance (ats motto)
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-3-2006 @ 04:17 AM by Merger
|
Cheers!
Kind Regards
Merger
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-3-2006 @ 05:35 AM by larry994
|
No problem, glad I could help.
larry994
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-3-2006 @ 06:03 AM by suzy ryan
|
This is funny to me because with all the denial of the bleeding obvious that goes on here, and the amount of masons that make it look like their own
site, to me it reads, Deny (Deny Deny) = Ignorance.
Surely I'm not the only one familier with 'secret' public speaking. You know, the old code of, "mean what you say, but don't say what you mean",
the old "double meaning double speak"?
Could "Deny Ignorance" mean, "This is where Masons/that ilk can come to 'spread' ignorance"?
I probably wouldn't think this way if the home board had a permanent link to the many codes and tactics used by secret society members, in everything
from speech patterns, posture, dress etc., to even, home and garden design and decore.
Seriously, with the rapid growth of members, wouldn't it 'look' better, for a conspiracy site, if newbies could bone up on, 'the language of
secrets and codes' and other tools to avoid being hoodwinked, instead of being sent to long threads full of masons playing the 'deny, deny, deny
game', when they ask these key questions?
Please folk, don't attack me for this post. I know all the arguments used to shout down those who question the purpose of ATS (I still hurt for poor
whitelightwolf), but you can't say you "DENY IGNORANCE" unless you question ALL things.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-3-2006 @ 09:08 AM by tropicallee
|
Suzy Ryan I think you miss the point of Deny Ignorance completely, did you even look at that other thread by the Admin? You cannot deny ignorance with
out seeing all sides of an issue even if you disagree with that other side. I registered on this site last year, forgot about it for a while, came
back and spents weeks lurking offline and just reading before getting enough nerve and overcoming my paranoid fears of Big Brother before posting.
Have you ever read some of the very early threads on this site, they are still here you know and I think if people took the time to really read
through the really old stuff till present, they would see that there isn't something to fear and that this board is run by Masons, I can point you
to boards run by Masons, maybe you should compare those to this place and then rethink your position. During my lurking Suzy Ryan, I have to admit I
have read many of your posts, and there are certain member names which I have already made an opinion on. Some of these people, I think are pretty
bright, others are funny, some just regular like me and then there are absolutely closeminded, bigoted and arrogant individuals on here. There are
also quite a few mentally imbalanced people on this website and you Suzy Ryan are one of them. Get a grip on reality.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-3-2006 @ 09:29 AM by dbates
|
Originally posted by suzy ryan
This is funny to me because with all the denial of the bleeding obvious that goes on here, and the amount of masons that make it look like their own
site, to me it reads, Deny (Deny Deny) = Ignorance. 
That depends on what forum you hang out in. Some think (From being in the war on terror forum too much) this site is just an anti-Arab site. Some
believe(from ufo forum) that this site is full of government dis-info agents. It's all a point of view. I personally don't notice the Masons at
all, but then I rarely go into the Secret Organizations forum.
ATS...sort of like the story of the 6 blind men and the elephant.
external image
And so these men of Indostan
Disputed loud and long,
Each in his own opinion
Exceeding stiff and strong,
Though each was partly in the right,
And all were in the wrong!
[edit on 17-3-2006 by dbates]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-3-2006 @ 11:41 AM by suzy ryan
|
Originally posted by tropicallee
Suzy Ryan I think you miss the point of Deny Ignorance completely....There are also quite a few mentally imbalanced people on this website and you
Suzy Ryan are one of them. Get a grip on reality. 
Gee did you bother to read my post?
You missed my points completely.
Your last lines are the classic tactic of one with no point to argue but not wanting the other's concidered.
It's so very old, weak, boring and insulting, though more to those who use it than those it's used against. Oh, and against the T&C of this site.
But don't worry, no one gets so much as a warn when they break rules to insult (shut their ears to) me, which doesn't bother me as the applause and
extra points I've got for my posts lets me know I'm not completely wasting my time here.
So should we think you, like so many masons here, have some extra special ability to diagnose peoples mental health, from net posts?
Maybe you should all get together and start a buget practice, with all you'ld save on rooms rental, blood tests etc., that the real doctors can't do
without.
O.K. Now there have been alot of bad things thought and said about ATS lately, here, on other sites and in 'the real world'.
I actually made suggestions that would help people trust ATS, going by the many complaints I've heard and read.
Years of living with a corrupt copper, who ended up becoming a Christian, made me too familier with the "deny, deny, deny" mantra and the "mean
what you say but don't say what mean" concept, of that 'brotherhood', as are many others. Alot of these people are sensitive to key words and
their arrangement. Denying it doesn't make it otherwise.
Attacks like yours actually make people hold more firmly to their initial impression or stop them from questioning (the path to denying ignorance) and
drive many people away from the site. You can "tell" people to "trust" ATS but that will only make them more suspect if you don't also "show"
them.
You can deny alot of people don't trust ATS, all you like, but that doesn't make it so. I simply pointed out some things the admins. could address
to help turn that around.
Oh, and there are also disinfo. and 'repeat, repeat, repeat untill they believe the lie', folk on this site, who can sometimes be recognized by
their calling those they can't shout down, mentally imbalanced.
Get a grip on reality. This is a site where conspiracies can be discussed, unless you've got the power to change it's purpose, as well as declare
who is and isn't sane by your reading skill.
Look, I am aware alot of people see ATS as 'family' and get all paternal when they think it's being hurt but would any sane person not warn their
loved one of self harming behaviour rather than hurt their feelings?
There are things ATS could do to improve the cyclicly negative opinions held by more than a few. One is calming down folk who attack others for
suggesting any of those things.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-3-2006 @ 03:00 PM by XL5
|
Suzy, its too bad that I can't vote for you twice in one month. Over the last 1-2 years, I've seen this "family" grow AND become "paternal", its
become alternative chat, not conspiracy disscussion. Sure one or two jabs with silly pictures is ok, but then it goes on for pages and starts to look
like constructive dismissal.
Hoaxes or posts that seem like huge hoaxes shouldn't make the long time members go on auto protect ATS mode. It reminds me of when people state
thier favorite console and everybody goes nuts and defends thier system and demands its the best.
However I don't think its masons at all, I think its all a need to belong.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-3-2006 @ 09:26 PM by suzy ryan
|
Originally posted by XL5
However I don't think its masons at all, I think its all a need to belong. 
Ta XL5, you picked up on what I was getting at, the difference between belonging and feeling ostrisized.
I like seeing all sorts of people express all sorts of views, I'm not one to suffer from info. overload, but rather find that the more sence and
non-sence I'm aware of, the easier it is to recognize the difference between the two.
When a majority feel moved to attack anyone on a expressed view, rather than a, "cool, but I don't see it that way", then the board looks like
it's trying to force an 'accepted', rather than 'proven' view on others.
The loss to the standard of ATS is probably never seen, as many 'lurkers', who could have great info. to share, read these 'gang attacks' and
decide they don't want to be a part of it.
It's one thing to say, 'you're welcome', but quite a different thing to make folk 'feel' welcome.
Sure we can all get tired, moody and 'off' in responces to emotional topics and most can accept that if genuine admissions of posting 'below par',
follow.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-3-2006 @ 09:38 PM by LeftBehind
|
I can see how you might have that view point from hanging out in the secret societies forum, it has been a problem for a long time there and has been
dealt with in a number of ways.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
It got so bad for a while that some of the worst offenders ended up being banned.
However no single forum really represents ATS as a whole IMHO.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-3-2006 @ 10:31 PM by suzy ryan
|
The thing is, like I said, the more views and info. I can find, the better I like it, so I actually read most forums and respond to many.
If I only found these 'pit bull' type posts on secret soc. or religion and the like, it wouldn't 'look' suspect to me at all, but when you see
certain people attack others on 'innocent' threads because they didn't like something they posted elsewhere (like one who tracked me down on a mad
cow thread to imply I was anti-semite, because I can't support eugenics!?) or when out of the blue, someone claims to have read most of your posts
and conciders you mental, without saying how or why they came to that conclusion, or countering the post they want others to disreguard based on their
opinion of you, well...
But to me the most 'worrying' consistant trend on ATS is that defending masonry and attacking Christians (no matter what topic they're posting on)
is so much more important to so many, than issues like the proven conspiracies of the modern slave trade, child sex rings etc. and that lately, though
some have declared child sacrifice to NOT be "wrong or evil", so few have jumped in to disagree.
On the whole I see a attitude of "do what thou will; unless you will to be a Christian", a sort of 'green light' for any and everything, except
being seen to believe some things (like the torture death of a 3 y.o. in the hope of getting unlimited riches) ARE evil.
Thankfully, I've also found many kind, wise and caring posters who encourage me that there still is alot of good in the world. Soficrow, Loam,
Orangetom, think2much and many others with 'creative' names I won't attempt spell and who my cold filled head won't let me recall.
I really do enjoy my time on ATS, even the 'pit bulls', but then I used to work with dangerous 'animals' so their timid owners didn't have to
fear them anymore.
My concerns are for those new and timid 'lurkers' we may never get to hear from due to them reading 'pack attacks' on poor new souls who dared to
ask the 'wrong' question.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2006 @ 12:58 AM by Majic
|
Plausible Deniability
One of the things I like about the motto "Deny Ignorance" is that it can be interpreted in so many different ways.
I am a fan of irony, after all.
One irony is that ATS would have a motto at all, since at the very heart and soul of ATS is an inherent respect for differing opinions to the degree
that even something as innocuous as a motto could be seen as an attempt to sway opinion.
The real substance of the matter, however, is found in the nature of what ATS is: a community of people who don't like being told what to think.
These are the kind of people who gravitate to ATS.
Tacit Agreement
In such an environment, even a motto can be challenged, and is not binding. Only the
AboveTopSecret.com Terms And Conditions Of Use actually are, and can be loosely
summarized as follows:
1. Be honest.
2. Be polite.
3. Don't break the law.
4. Respect the staff.
Members who do these things are very unlikely to run afoul of the specifics of the T&C, and the staff goes to great lengths to respect all opinions
which do not violate the agreement under which we post here.
Of Bulls And Elephants
I sometimes find myself feeling the same way suzy ryan does about one forum or another, but never about ATS as a whole. ATS is greater than the
sum of its parts.
And though a troll gang here or a haxor there may cause trouble now and then, the foundation of ATS remains strong.
That's because ATS isn't based on a single personality, opinion or principle, but on the diversity of personalities, opinions and principles that
results when we all come together to talk that "crazy talk" we all love to indulge in.
More often than I like, I'll find myself railing in self-righteous fervor about one thing or another. Then, when the flames die down, I find myself
learning another lesson in humility. I seem to need frequent re-education in that discipline, for some reason.
But always I find myself re-learning the lesson dbates so aptly referred to above: a parable which gives us another perspective on the nature
of our own ignorance.
There is much wisdom in the tale of The Blind Men and the Elephant, and much we can learn
when we realize how accurately it describes the circumstances in which we ATSers debate the many questions of the day, a fable which concludes with
this memorable and resonant verse:
So oft in theologic wars,
The disputants, I ween,
Rail on in utter ignorance
Of what each other mean,
And prate about an Elephant
Not one of them has seen!
Just so.
Deny Ignorance.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2006 @ 02:03 AM by larry994
|
Originally posted by dbatesThat depends on what forum you hang out in. Some think (From being in the war on terror forum too much) this
site is just an anti-Arab site. Some believe(from ufo forum) that this site is full of government dis-info agents. 
And on, and on and on. That's why I hang out in Below TopSecret more than anywhere else. Besides it's more fun!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2006 @ 02:59 AM by WyrdeOne
|
www.wordfocus.com...
And so these men of Indostan
Disputed loud and long,
Each in his own opinion
Exceeding stiff and strong,
Though each was partly in the right,
And all were in the wrong!
Kudos to Dbates.  That was an excellent point.
I think the comparison made was apt. I've noticed the same thing, that understanding is a matter of perspective and not just perception.
Another appropriate analogy might be this.
That's just one small garden, and you can't see the whole thing from one vantage point. ATS is easily as complex as that garden, if not a million
times more so, because of what it represents - a diverse human community. Life is quite a lot bigger than one garden.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2006 @ 03:20 AM by suzy ryan
|
Fully support the truth of the last two posts and I love Japanese gardens, the way they look wild and natural yet are highly planned and controled to
look that way.
So from those wider and deeper, perspectives and perceptions, can anyone here see how a thread questioning the 'double meaning' of 'deny
ingnorance', turning into an ATS praise thread, may make newbies suspicious?
I still think a permenant link to things like debating tactics, secret and code 'languages' and other tools for conspiracy theorists, on the home
page, would 'say' much more good about the integrity of ATS than the praising posts or 'old timers' and 'regulars'.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2006 @ 10:05 PM by suzy ryan
|
Can anyone provide a link to 'double speak', coded and 'secret' 'languages'?
I can't remember any old ones I used to have but would be more interested in what is being printed about them today.
Sharing meaning I've learned from the source would only have a bunch of folk screaming for 'proof'.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2006 @ 10:41 PM by Merger
|
Heh, not sure about what you mean about double speak, but I was always concerned when someone says 'I didn't do nothing!!' (general people assume
they mean they didn't do anything...but literally, it means they DID do something!!"
I found it interesting that some people talk this way in court.... (judge judy cases i've seen)
Judge assumes they are saying they didn't do anything.......but the person saying it may not be lieing...and actually admitting they they did infact
do something....... interesting!!!
Also, there is a tourist advert from australia that is being advertised around the world........ the words 'where the bloody hell are you' are
used..... people are raving on and on about the word 'bloody' being used.... i think even though its good people are questioning this...it seems to
be a slide of hand technique.... I'd rather be more concerned with the word 'hell' being used instead....government of Australia are saying its a
good advert......hrmmm
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2006 @ 11:18 PM by suzy ryan
|
Originally posted by Merger
Heh, not sure about what you mean about double speak!
Also, there is a tourist advert from australia that is being advertised around the world........ the words 'where the bloody hell are you' are
used..... people are raving on and on about the word 'bloody' being used.... i think even though its good people are questioning this...it seems to
be a slide of hand technique.... I'd rather be more concerned with the word 'hell' being used instead....government of Australia are saying its a
good advert......hrmmm 
Double Speak; when you can say one thing publicly but mean something quite different but ONLY those who know the 'code' will understand.
Remember 'the old school tie', how it would tell strangers you're one of 'them', well start looking at the ties of certain media personalities,
politicians, news readers and those at big meeting etc. There's a 'pattern' in the cycle of colours and designs that more fits what's to come in
war and business than anything to do with fashion trends.
In order to avoid being busted for conspiracy, "they", have to be able to comunicate quickly and boldly without being anything but innocent. The
mans suit is a uniform for "them" to display "authority" to "command" without saying a word.
As to our "bloody hell" ad, well it should have been expected now that we have great huge "welcoming" Pyramid on a Sydney freeway.
Alot of expats. who went away to get rich and famous are now coming back home and bringing alot of others with them. Even Cate Blanchet is coming back
so she can "send her son to an Australian school". Yeah right, like she can't afford to get him into the best schools where ever she lives.
One of the purposes of those 'secret meetings' is to be brought up to date on changing codes as the odd 'spy' twigs to them and 'new orders' are
about to be 'announced'.
There is so much to this subject I just can't understand why a conspiracy site doesn't make it a feature.
But anyway, "Where the bloody hell are you?" don't you know this is the promised land?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2006 @ 11:32 PM by Merger
|
Goodness gracious..... and Australia has a lot of 'symbolism' with regards to the egyptian culture....
I mean its even called 'The land down under' (i've heard people saying that it is in reference to hell...lol)
And even a lot of hollywood stars supposed to be aussies....Ie Nicole Kidman, Sam Niel..... Nicole was born in Hawai and Sam Niel was supposedly born
in New Zealand...
Now is Mel Gibson actually Aussie born (not sure, as to why i asked)...
Kind Regards
Merger
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |

<< 1 2 >>
|
|
Top Topics Right Now:
Active Topics Right Now:
ATS MIX Podcasts:
Newest Topics:
|
|