It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Spectacular UFO image

page: 9
0
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 05:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by scepticsteve
where do the laser beams come out?


Haven't you seen ID4? From the front near the "ECM module". Actually, it would seem that the protrusions are missing. Maybe it's just a probe.


Sorry, but I'm beginning to even doubt my X-33 Space Plane idea in support of the seagull.

[edit on 17-3-2006 by LucyStoner76]




posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 05:36 PM
link   
Just thought id throw my comment in

Its blatantly a SEAGULL




posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 05:55 PM
link   
ok im no photo expert but i noe for sure tat this photo is a fake for sure ok so anyone tat think is real ya really dumb~Zionbaby


Wig

posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 06:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by MadGreebo
hahahaha after years living by the ocean I can say this for sure.....Its a seagull! ROFL....


If you look at the top image, you can see the beak and the eye. The wings are folded away and down, thats why they look odd, but sorry dude, this is a great piccie of a seagull but not worth 30 grand....rofl.


Well spotted mate, as soon as you said that it was obvious.

I can't believe people actually think this is a UFO when it is so clearly a seagull.

not read the whole thread yet...more laughs to come



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 06:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by llfrequencyll
Check this out

cn.geocities.com...

Resembles the Vancouver Island pic in a way.


Probably because they are both birds.



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 06:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by nataylor
Why do people keep mentioning size? There's nothing in that picture that indicates any kind of size. We have no idea of the position of the object relative to the lens and the background. But given that it looks like a bird, it's reasonable to assume it the size of normal bird.

Or does this picture make you think there are giant birds out there: www.svendchristensensgalehus.dk...


AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH! A giant bird!!!!!!!!!! And it's about to eat a lighthouse!!! Everybody run!!!!!!!!!!!!! AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 07:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by mrjenka
Yet again, that is one HUGE seagall. It must be eating human in order to get that big. Even in the third image the far away view, the 'object' looks big seagalls aren't that big. Furthermore, seagalls to tend to fly togetherm this is a picture of just ONE seagall in the middle of nowhere. It's so easy to discredit something. Every single UFO picture ever took can be discredited, ballons, planes, seagalls, natural gasses, shooting stars etc,, etc,,, etc,, Why don't you guys show me what you think is a UFO and let me discredit you.



I live in nj and by the waterfront in the town i live in they fly alone a lot of the time.



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 07:32 PM
link   
lol well, I dont understand how it could be a seagull. I've never saw a seagull that big and especially not with the lustrous shine.



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 07:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by llfrequencyll
lol well, I dont understand how it could be a seagull. I've never saw a seagull that big and especially not with the lustrous shine.


Ok, the "size" has been explained repeatedly by PERSPECTIVE. The "shine" is an artifact from a low-quality digital camera. Didn't you post this exact paragraph earlier?




[edit on 3/17/2006 by eaglewingz]

[edit on 3/17/2006 by eaglewingz]



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 07:40 PM
link   
Yet again I will reinerate what I said 50,000 times before. I posted 3 links not ONE look at all the links I posted and tell me if ALL the pictures are birds. Please do not make personal attacks at people that do not agree with the seagull concept as we are all human and are intitled to our own opinions. I am waiting for responses on link2 and link3. If you can not find these, I will be more than happy to repost. Thanks.



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 07:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by mrjenka
Please do not make personal attacks at people that do not agree with the seagull concept as we are all human and are intitled to our own opinions.


You're telling us that? Hmm.


How about instead of telling us to point out the reasons they are all birds, you point out the reason you think they are UFO's, besides the fact that they are an object in the sky... like I said before.

[edit on 3/17/2006 by xxblackoctoberxx]



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 07:48 PM
link   
1. original pic = seagull
2. Uk = seagull
3. Jersey City = goose
4. Egypt = raptor

There. All 4 links.

The noise-to-signal ratio in the UFO field is way too high as it is. The obvious IFOs need to be never seen again. But, like the World Trade Center Sci-Fi Channel UFO ad, they keep getting posted over and over again.

I WANT to believe. I WANT to see a genuine photo or other evidence. I just wish the obvious fakes, scams, and IFO's would go away.

[edit on 3/17/2006 by eaglewingz]



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 07:54 PM
link   
Eaglewingz- I respect your prespective and I enjoyed your response. But can you beyond the resonable doubt prove to me that those 4 links are all birds? Or are you making an educated guess? Granted, I might agree with you that link one MIGHT be of a seagall, but the rest of the links are great coincidences, they all look alike, they all have the same form, color, and size. If all the links are segalls but you can't just write something off as a raptor just because it is the easiest explanation.



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 08:04 PM
link   
The first one does not look like a seagull to me. However the second one maybe. Assuming that the bird is viewed from the side, (if it is a bird) I'm really surprised at the fatness of it. It almost looks like a heavy egg, like if its unable to fly. At the same time though I'm able to trace a shape of a bird so that got me really confused. I do not think the third one is a bird. From my perspective its just too big of an object (I compared it with other nearby objects) to fly. Almost looks like if an ostrich acheived flight.



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 08:07 PM
link   
Sure, I can point out the feet hanging down. I can show you the pointed shape of the .. I can show you the blunter point of the tail. I can show you the wings in most of them. It's all very clear.

So yes, I would say it is more than an educated guess. I'm not a photo analyst, but I'm quite sure an actual analyst would make this id stand up in any court of law. I was going to draw the lines to show these features, but really, if you don't see it, you don't see it.

So I will take my leave now and look for some signal, not noise. And maybe do a little birdwatching.



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 08:09 PM
link   
Frequency- I have been saying that for days. They are not seagulls but damn chickens
Did you see the pic with 2 objects in them? Both looking the same, both same size, shape, color, that is the one that I am most intrested in. If you can't find a link let me know I will repost. Thank you for your opinion and not being rude or harsh.



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 08:10 PM
link   
eaglewingz, u said the fourth link is a raptor in Egypt? an f-22 raptor? or what exactly you mean. What's a raptor going to be doing in egypt?



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 08:10 PM
link   
This is clearly......or not so clearly an unidentified flying object...of some sort. he he he


I lean towards the bird theory.



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 08:11 PM
link   
Oh I think I missedd the pic with the 2 objects in them. Uh oh.... heh...



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 08:15 PM
link   
OK seagull people let's see a picture by monday afternoon that YOU took that looks simular. Ihave a camera that holds a thousand pictures and am going to spen some time by Michigans largest garbage mountain to see what I can get. If 4 or 5 people in 50 years can take a gull picture one weekend for thousands of people shouldn't be a problem to get 100's of pictures.

Simple thing really.

mikell

[edit on 17-3-2006 by mikellmikell]



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join