It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by uuhelpus
Who need an F-22? There asses could be kicked with mig-21s and f-4s BVR
The F-14 with the phoenix missile. Each AAM could destroy several bombers, maybe even a small formation.
A 24/7 strategic bombing campaign( no nukes). Raids that used to take 12 hours would run 1/3 that. They would quit very fast
Hitler would # a brick if he saw a formation of B-1s doing a .92 mach bombing pass at 500 ft
[edit on 28-3-2006 by uuhelpus]
Originally posted by fritz
I think you are missing the point.
St3ve_o posed the question - with todays technology (allied forces) how long would it take to beat the nazis with (1945 technology)?
Now you guys have taken a pretty decent thread and turn it in to something else. This thread was about weaponry - pure and simple. It is not about political will, power stations carrier battle groups and all the other demogogs that some of you want included.
It is about Hitler invading Poland in 1940, England and France declaring war on Germany and whether or not Germany could be defeated by (I presume) Anglo-French weaponry from 2006.
Originally posted by jazz_psyker
We seem to be implying olny the allies have modern tech, what about the axis?
What if they had stealth bombers, and radar?
Its realy hard to compare because different countrys had different technologys (allies had radar, US gave it to the allies who otherwise would be helpless). Who would have what modern technologys?