America today is.....What kind of system?? I'm confused!!, page 1

The system is a produced and co-created paradigm of
humanity and its achievements which exists as a by-product
of our summation as per empirically stored and cumulative
modus operandi for continuum as a species.

In essence it only exists in our minds as we have seen it to
be through interpretation and collective common goals as a
majority. The 'truths or axioms' that we decide are relevant
or profitable (I'm sure it was once pursuit of understanding
and awareness that began it as motivator) and are in and of
themselves apparent universals, consolidate their factual as
ascribed-absolution.

Nature has a funny system of its own yet its perfection and
dynamic complexity: balance of chaos and order indivisible. It
in its own regard is far superior as by design and execution of
design than anything humana has done in its 'artificial dominion'
of comfort over condition.

It may be that once we began to understand self-preservation by larger numbers and cooperation through communication that self-awareness led us to more intricate interpersonal communication and existence. While we have spent aeons trying to once and for all asnswer why we are here, we have lost
sight of that goal. Profit, self-indugent hedonism and pleasure
at any cost have twisted the aim of the whole which creates the
individual-you are a product of a system yes. So, I personally
write in regards to the 'System,' as the illusion of control by
illusion of existence. Popular opinion or majority rules as far as
that goes. You may say no, the gov't sucks, we don't have a
say....etc. But consider this:

Until people actually know themselves as existential beings
that are guided by causality as subjects to its domain, people
will still allow others to shape, control, decide, persuede and
dictate their own state of being whether you let an oaf at some
party haunt your angry place for a week as you allow energy and
effort to it while trying to understand that which itself does not.
Anyone who acts in any way that they themselves do not approve
or appreciate unto themselves-deserve whatever they get. It
is only the righteous being that can by rights choose to dictate
this from that. It is for the average person by and large all of us
as far from perfect to ignore the fear and pressure by others to
shape us when they are no testament to absolution or perfection.

There is only you in your mind. Everyone else is you as you would
be in exchange of place by perception. The only truths are those
that apply to you. The only requirement to existence as far as I
and others I know, to being, is to have a good time and don't hurt
anybody. To start theological protest or argue this point is to offer that God doesn't want us to behave and enjoy being. Wanna be
a contestant? I don't know much, but I don't think anyone who
worries about satellite factors of our world and bares the world
in fear and subjegation or duress ought to ignore the rules as
ordained by human standards or need to wound-share, and get
on with being who they want. This does not lead to decay but
to salvation. To create my life by my hand while not allowing any other to impede my growth by allowing my own negative reactions
to them overshadow my need for equality or my need to maintain
mastery of self, is my lifeplan. Why cannot another see it? If I
know I am not offering these words to improve myself in the eyes
of others as prideful or arrogant assertions, then why will some
undoubtedly not read all of this before making inevitable excuses
for their own KNOWN behavioral truths to one who chooses awareness as seeing another's actions as an invitation to see
a part of them in their logic while not losing them in blindness to
my own emotional reaction or desire to react as is compulsive and
obvious of the human condition by and large?

There is what you believe there to be. There is only that which
you believe to affect you that you operate as such. There is only
a system, government, hierarchy, class, war, economic stability,
and the like if you allow these non-realities or imagined rules to
apply. They are conceptual, not actual. The gov't is not one mind
of single concious control and initiative. Ironically, it is generally
the individuals who are capable by design (good, law-abiding,
common sense and just decent people), who suffer unto the system most by allowing its assured reality the most by civil understanding.

The naive are the victims in a world now based on survival of the
smartest not the fittest now. I don't care if I digress, I just offer
what I was inspired to write as one who knows where they stand
and likes it. I am and so, I apply the golden rule, avoid sins and
appreciate every moment I get to be, in existence. I am of the
school of thought that sees ideological precepts, dogmas and
other institutions of complex design models as merely philosophical formulas to give reason and motive for justification
by those that be in power so they can keep their power.

Most of us probably agree that (I assess that people who go to
debate or intellectually motivated websites are not the feral underbelly of society's evils) we don't need anyone watching over
us the general public. If people act as they like to be treated, there usually isn't a negative occurance. Food for thought, I
suppose.