It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by iori_komei
If you used A to find out the particles Position, and used B to find out it's Momentum, and sent that information to C, than would not the computer than know both the momentum and position of the particle?
Thusly getting around Heisenberg's principal?
Really like some of the more science oriented ATSers help on this, thanks.
Originally posted by iori_komei
Now I started thinking, if you had a set of scanners, A and B and a computer C.
If you used A to find out the particles Position, and used B to find out it's Momentum, and sent that information to C, than would not the computer than know both the momentum and position of the particle?
Originally posted by d1k
Just a small inconvience that I'm sure someone someday will find a way around it.
They always find ways around things.
Originally posted by d1k
Just a small inconvience that I'm sure someone someday will find a way around it.
They always find ways around things.
Just a small inconvience that I'm sure someone someday will find a way around it.
They always find ways around things.
Originally posted by iori_komei
Now I started thinking, if you had a set of scanners, A and B and a computer C.
If you used A to find out the particles Position, and used B to find out it's Momentum, and sent that information to C, than would not the computer than know both the momentum and position of the particle?
Thusly getting around Heisenberg's principal?
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
The momentum of the quantum particles are changed by observing that particle. You need a photon to observe a quantum particle, like anything else.The photon has to bounce off of that particle and into the camera, eye, lense, whatever. If you think of it like two balls hitting each other, in order for us to see the particle, the ball has to bounce off of it, thereby transfering some of it's energy, and changing its momentum. as long as you are observing it's position, it's velocity will be different than it usually is.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
I see, because the the quantum state of matter is so "uncertain", by that I mean particles bouncing in and out of existence, relying on probability to control their states, measuring anything at any particular time does little good because it won't be in that exact state again.
Originally posted by off2_infinity
there must be some hidden variable or an undiscovered law that can explain the apparent randomness observed in quantum systems...