Child porn ring transmitted acts live on Web, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 22-3-2006 @ 03:27 PM by loam


N.Y. loophole may free Internet pedophiles

NEW YORK, March 22 (UPI) -- A challenge to New York state's Internet anti-pedophile law could result in hundreds of convictions being overturned.

The challenge comes from ex-real estate lawyer Jeffrey Kozlow, who argues that he did nothing criminal two years ago when he went online and typed graphic, sexual propositions to a New York detective posing as a 14-year-old boy.

Kozlow argues the 1996 law says it is illegal to try to seduce a minor through a communication that "depicted sexual conduct." He claims words are not depictions, the New York Post reported Wednesday.

More...



What a joke.


reply posted on 23-3-2006 @ 03:07 AM by benevolent tyrant
They say that pedophiles are "sick". Almost every post replying to this thread have called these individuals "sick". So, I would suppose that I would be safe to say that these individuals are, indeed "sick". Who could argue this point?

Now what sort of sickness do these people have? Too much testosterone? I don't know. If that were the case, chemical castration using a drug called depo-provera would eliminate the capability and the physical desire to have sex. But that is not the case. As was mentioned in an earlier post on this thread, these pedophiles would still have an urge to molest, fondle or whatever it is that satisfies their psyche. This is the point that I am making. Pedophilia is not a sexual act per se. It is a form of psychological illness. It is an overwhelming compulsion to control, dominate, or express some sort of twisted and distorted aspect of what they would call "love".

You could incarcerate such individuals for twenty years and they would still have this compulsion, this obsession, to violate children. You could castrate them and they would still feel some sort of psychological need to use children to fulfill their own psychological need and desire -- often distorting their actions as something that is loving or something that the child him or herself desires. In other words, these individuals will do this regardless of the consequences.

There does not seem to be any successful treatment for this sickness, compulsion, deviancy, perversion or psychological disorder or maladjustment. The recidivism rate for pedophilia is overwhelming.

What are we to do? What can we do with these individuals while still protecting our children? Personally, I would have no compunction against putting these individuals to death. Some deep rooted, innate sense finds such behavior abhorrent and intolerable. Even if there was a successful treatment for pedophiles, I would still desire retribution -- death -- against these individuals.

Nevertheless, I have to question whether it is just to execute a person who has, as many would seem to agree, a mental illness?

Again I have to ask, what are we to do with such individuals?

We send rapists to jail and, when released, they often re-offend. Voyeurs, a far less serious crime is also punished by jail or psychological treatment and they too re-offend at a high rate. In fact, it would seem that many acts that are sexual in nature but also have an aspect of psychological deviancy or compulsion all have a high recidivism rate regardless of imprisonment or psychological therapy. These people, it would seem, have such socially repugnant behaviors "hard-wired" into their psyches.

What are we as a just society to do with such individuals?

We could execute them....but does that not raise the issue of executing the mentally ill?

We could imprison them but our prison system is based upon the concept of rehabilitation. Yet, we are dealing with the incorrigible, people whose psychological state compels them to perform such heinous acts. Imprisonment or psychological treatment fails, time and time again, to rehabilitate or treat these individuals to the point that they could be trusted to re-enter society.

Again, I ask, what are we to do with such individuals?

We could execute them while ignoring the psychologically imbalanced nature of their actions. We could imprison them without satisfactory assurance that they will ever be rehabilitated. We could confine them to mental institutions where, again we, as a society, do not have the assurance that the pedophile would not repeat their "sick" actions upon another child when they are released after having completed "treatment".

I find that this topic has opened a moral and ethical quagmire or morass that raises issues that can only be called disturbing, to say the least. It is a question that points at the myriad of psycho-sexual disturbances that plague our entire society. From the torment of the sex addict who feverishly scans the world wide web to gaze at endless numbers of nude bodies to the questions of how there could possibly be so many people who are willing to sell their souls, their dignity and self esteem by performing sexual acts for a dollar. We have prepubescent girls imitating pop stars like Britanny Spears and the Christina Aguileras of the world and the parents who allow it in the name of fashion and social trends -- the breeding ground of a sexually inflamed society.

What are we to do?

I don't know. I don't have the answers. Except that I know that if I were raising an animal and the animal went "bad", that is, became vicious, I'd put it down. Perhaps these are questions that future generations will have to answer when they have solved the riddle of these tortured minds, until then, I have to say, for the good of the community, the society, we have to put these human beings gone bad down. That's my answer. But I still have questions.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^