I've notice the
See [[topic]]
to refer people to the proper entry.
Are we also gonna use

See also [[topic]]
to refer people to entires that provide additional inf?
Or is there another method being used.

example:
I want to make an entry for Lee Harvey Oswald and have a "see also" to the JFK conspiracy entry.

Thanks for that info on redirect. I'll edit the "see"I did yesterday

What is the preferred method for external link:
after the entry, as a list of external links, or
as number notes in the body of the entry.
Or, does it depend how many external links you have??

I think the links should be a little descriptive to help people find what they are interested in a little easier. Is this what you are asking?

Edit: I see what you are saying. I have been listing the external links as a list at the bottom of the article. It is just easier that way. I think as we go along we can refine the articles and put links in the body when we see a word or pohrase that can use them. So really I think both ways work.

[edit on 3-14-2006 by William One Sac]

Yeah sorry about using the 'See [[article]]' links, I wasn't aware of the #REDIRECT [[article]] function.
I've been adding a couple of ==Related Topics/Entries== subsections to a couple of pages to allow users to find more info on related stuff.

No worries nrky. We are all new to this and learning as we go.

hmmmm.... I think we might need to start setting up template headers, and template header ORDERS, as well.
ie.
(main body of text)
==Relevant ATS Discussion Threads==
==More Info & Further Study== (would contain external links)
==Related Topics== (internal links, more specific than using categories)
==References== (where the ref tag sends it's stuff)

etc..

[edit on 14/3/2006 by nrky]